|
Post by upthetown on Aug 8, 2014 13:39:29 GMT 1
Think Clayton/Butterfield would have to be an initial loan now anyway, if they want to be involved tomorrow. Think the permanent signing deadline for tomorrow is lunch time today.
|
|
|
Post by BoltonTerrier on Aug 8, 2014 13:58:02 GMT 1
Butterfield signed. GTFI!
|
|
|
Post by H7 on Aug 8, 2014 14:00:41 GMT 1
Quality signing - announcing today do you know Adam? Is he available for tomorrow?
|
|
|
Post by terriermcd on Aug 8, 2014 14:00:49 GMT 1
Butterfield signed. GTFI! Who's said that?
|
|
|
Post by BoltonTerrier on Aug 8, 2014 14:01:37 GMT 1
Butterfield signed. GTFI! Who's said that? I have...
|
|
|
Post by 3Pipe on Aug 8, 2014 14:02:26 GMT 1
Good stuff!
|
|
jim59
Darren Bullock Terrier
Posts: 904
|
Post by jim59 on Aug 8, 2014 14:02:56 GMT 1
Butterfield signed. GTFI! Officially or rumour?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 8, 2014 14:04:14 GMT 1
Word via a contact I guess? I trust your information Adam. Cracking signing.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 8, 2014 14:08:26 GMT 1
OOOSH! Get behind the goal tomorrow lads & lasses. you KNOW it makes sense!
|
|
|
Post by BoltonTerrier on Aug 8, 2014 14:09:41 GMT 1
Butterfield signed. GTFI! Officially or rumour? Officially. He wasnt on 20k a week at Boro. He was at Norwich but was on less than half that at Boro...
|
|
|
Post by ritchie on Aug 8, 2014 14:09:56 GMT 1
so.. butterfield (500k?) + cody (500k?) + 500k cash + addons, for a player with a year left on his contract.
why was everyone so worried?
|
|
smooth
Juvenile Terrier
Posts: 13
|
Post by smooth on Aug 8, 2014 14:10:41 GMT 1
Chuffed with this!
|
|
|
Post by Doc Halladay 32 on Aug 8, 2014 14:10:46 GMT 1
If he signs he'll be the highest paid player at this club. He's on £20k p/w at Boro. We would never pay anyone 20k a week. In my opinion the guy has a lot to prove before he comes close to 5-10k a week. Very injury prone and why so many moves. He may be good but come on, 20k a week. WOW The 20k a week is nonsense, if it were true we'd have paid it to Clayton.
|
|
|
Post by Cosmo Kramer on Aug 8, 2014 14:11:02 GMT 1
Does this mean Clayton has left then?
|
|
jwhudd802
Iain Dunn Terrier
[M0:0]
Posts: 495
|
Post by jwhudd802 on Aug 8, 2014 14:11:37 GMT 1
Officially. He wasnt on 20k a week at Boro. He was at Norwich but was on less than half that at Boro... Told you.....
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 8, 2014 14:12:45 GMT 1
so.. butterfield (500k?) + cody (500k?) + 500k cash + addons, for a player with a year left on his contract. why was everyone so worried? When you put it like that.....I feel like a right tool for acting like a drama queen now.
|
|
|
Post by pettsy74 on Aug 8, 2014 14:13:54 GMT 1
Officially. He wasnt on 20k a week at Boro. He was at Norwich but was on less than half that at Boro... So officially butterfield and Clayton are both town players ( even if it is only for a hour or 2 !) Bet boros version of the Devon terrier is going into meltdown mode right now !
|
|
|
Post by Cosmo Kramer on Aug 8, 2014 14:13:51 GMT 1
so.. butterfield (500k?) + cody (500k?) + 500k cash + addons, for a player with a year left on his contract. why was everyone so worried? Wasn't Coady 375k?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 8, 2014 14:14:33 GMT 1
Quality replacement for Clayton. However, our biggest weaknesses in midfield last season were that it lacked defensive capability (addressed by signing Coady to compete with Hogg), it lacked the link between midfield and attack (we've brought in Majewski, Holmes could step up and Lolley looks made for a false 10 role). Also lacked leadership, but I question whether Butterfield brings much of that. We haven't consistently got the best out of Norwood, but I wonder how much of that was due to him being most effective in the Clayton role. Then there's the pathways. Look at our most promising youth players and a lot of them play a central midfield role. Mixed feelings on this turn to concern about spending valuable resources on midfield, at the expense of defence and attack. Agree 100%, do not see why we need Butterfield. Surely the priority is a striker and CB. I wouldn't have thought we could add much more to the current wage bill either
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 8, 2014 14:20:12 GMT 1
So we have a lots if midfielders, gobern must be a gonner I think
Still want a striker and defender
|
|
htfc1984
Darren Bullock Terrier
Posts: 952
|
Post by htfc1984 on Aug 8, 2014 14:20:43 GMT 1
Officially. He wasnt on 20k a week at Boro. He was at Norwich but was on less than half that at Boro... So officially butterfield and Clayton are both town players ( even if it is only for a hour or 2 !) Bet boros version of the Devon terrier is going into meltdown mode right now ! Am I missing something here? Where has it been announced?? It isn't official yet is it?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 8, 2014 14:20:44 GMT 1
D-Day today in the Clayton/Butterfield saga according to the newsnetwork source in the North East. 80% and rising.
|
|
|
Post by SaudiTerrier on Aug 8, 2014 14:21:10 GMT 1
so.. butterfield (500k?) + cody (500k?) + 500k cash + addons, for a player with a year left on his contract. why was everyone so worried? Wasn't Coady 375k? Now that he's signed by the great Huddersfield Town he's automatically worth more than he was at lowly Liverpool
|
|
|
Post by Grandfather Berty of Cleck on Aug 8, 2014 14:21:36 GMT 1
so.. butterfield (500k?) + cody (500k?) + 500k cash + addons, for a player with a year left on his contract. why was everyone so worried? Wasn't Coady 375k? I heard that the scum bags down the road offered £400,000 but were not willing to meet Liverpool's valuation of him. But that might be a load of bollox as £375,000 has been mentioned a few times. We might not find out until we get Dean drunk.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 8, 2014 14:22:12 GMT 1
Sounds like another good quality signing if it all pans out. I am interested to know where that puts the Clayton deal which seems to have gone a little quiet of late.
|
|
|
Post by Doc Halladay 32 on Aug 8, 2014 14:23:17 GMT 1
D-Day today in the Clayton/Butterfield saga according to the newsnetwork source in the North East. 80% and rising. I am willing to give you free tuition in percentages if you wish Lopez
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 8, 2014 14:23:25 GMT 1
I heard that the scum bags down the road offered £400,000 but were not willing to meet Liverpool's valuation of him. But that might be a load of bollox as £375,000 has been mentioned a few times. We might not find out until we get Dean drunk. I thought I read it was 375k initially rising to 500k with add ons but maybe I was drunk.
|
|
|
Post by terrierng on Aug 8, 2014 14:24:45 GMT 1
|
|
|
Post by burgerhitsthebar on Aug 8, 2014 14:25:40 GMT 1
Quality replacement for Clayton. However, our biggest weaknesses in midfield last season were that it lacked defensive capability (addressed by signing Coady to compete with Hogg), it lacked the link between midfield and attack (we've brought in Majewski, Holmes could step up and Lolley looks made for a false 10 role). Also lacked leadership, but I question whether Butterfield brings much of that. We haven't consistently got the best out of Norwood, but I wonder how much of that was due to him being most effective in the Clayton role. Then there's the pathways. Look at our most promising youth players and a lot of them play a central midfield role. Mixed feelings on this turn to concern about spending valuable resources on midfield, at the expense of defence and attack. Yeah I'm also in agreement here apart from Butterfield lacking leadership he did captain Barnsley at the age of 21 after all.
|
|
|
Post by Grandfather Berty of Cleck on Aug 8, 2014 14:25:40 GMT 1
I heard that the scum bags down the road offered £400,000 but were not willing to meet Liverpool's valuation of him. But that might be a load of bollox as £375,000 has been mentioned a few times. We might not find out until we get Dean drunk. I thought I read it was 375k initially rising to 500k with add ons but maybe I was drunk. That could well be correct.
|
|