|
The Hock
Aug 28, 2014 19:26:06 GMT 1
via mobile
Post by teddytheterrier on Aug 28, 2014 19:26:06 GMT 1
Been sacked!
|
|
|
Post by Tez on Aug 28, 2014 19:29:21 GMT 1
Why start a new thread?!
|
|
|
Post by barnsleydaz on Aug 28, 2014 19:30:40 GMT 1
Why not, are they in limited supply??
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 28, 2014 19:31:35 GMT 1
Very disappointing news
|
|
|
Post by Chips Longhorn on Aug 28, 2014 19:32:03 GMT 1
|
|
|
Post by patfield on Aug 28, 2014 19:32:29 GMT 1
|
|
|
Post by Michael Moon on Aug 28, 2014 19:34:07 GMT 1
Shame I wanted him to struggle on a bit longer,put em deep in the shit
|
|
|
Post by kautostar1 on Aug 28, 2014 19:41:30 GMT 1
Pathetic.
The Italian mong should be kicked out of football. Totally insane.
I feel very sorry for Hockaday. He has been treated disgracefully.
|
|
|
The Hock
Aug 28, 2014 19:46:11 GMT 1
via mobile
Post by jonnyboy on Aug 28, 2014 19:46:11 GMT 1
Terrible skin...
|
|
|
Post by gledholt terrier on Aug 28, 2014 19:47:51 GMT 1
|
|
|
The Hock
Aug 28, 2014 19:52:11 GMT 1
via mobile
Post by swollentoe on Aug 28, 2014 19:52:11 GMT 1
I wonder what the odds of Leeds having 3 managers in a season are ?
|
|
|
Post by Nickhudds.UTT on Aug 28, 2014 19:53:57 GMT 1
Hock got the chop......
Least surprising news in history.
|
|
|
The Hock
Aug 28, 2014 20:06:32 GMT 1
via mobile
Post by Christ in Shades (art) on Aug 28, 2014 20:06:32 GMT 1
I actually feel sorry Hockaday. Should never have been given the job in the first place, just used as a puppet.
|
|
|
The Hock
Aug 28, 2014 20:11:58 GMT 1
via mobile
Post by teddytheterrier on Aug 28, 2014 20:11:58 GMT 1
Sorry, on my phone at work didn't see the other Hockaday thread!
|
|
|
Post by JT on Aug 28, 2014 20:34:39 GMT 1
Why start a fookin thread in tge first place . Who gives a fuck about leeds .
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 28, 2014 20:38:33 GMT 1
Why start a fookin thread in tge first place . Who gives a fuck about leeds . Your language could do with toning down!! IMO.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 28, 2014 20:41:36 GMT 1
I see that fit and proper persons test the football authorities did worked well....
|
|
|
Post by barnsleydaz on Aug 28, 2014 20:47:10 GMT 1
I see that fit and proper persons test the football authorities did worked well.... They were just after a backhander Ben, thats it.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 28, 2014 20:49:41 GMT 1
I see that fit and proper persons test the football authorities did worked well.... They were just after a backhander Ben, thats it. We've all been there Dazzler....
|
|
|
Post by Chips Longhorn on Aug 28, 2014 20:55:34 GMT 1
Wings
|
|
|
The Hock
Aug 28, 2014 20:58:50 GMT 1
via mobile
Post by JT on Aug 28, 2014 20:58:50 GMT 1
Why start a fookin thread in tge first place . Who gives a fuck about leeds . Your language could do with toning down!! IMO. Why start a thread about leeds in the first flipping place who gives diddly about leeds United .
|
|
|
Post by stevvy on Aug 28, 2014 20:58:55 GMT 1
No great shock, he was brought in as a yes man, was a joke appointment and had to put up with a trigger happy owner buying players for him. In fact his appointment shows that nobody with any sense would touch that job with a barge pole, and that'll be even more true now. Cellino as owner/manager?
|
|
|
Post by barnsleydaz on Aug 28, 2014 21:00:42 GMT 1
Your language could do with toning down!! IMO. Why start a thread about leeds in the first flipping place who gives diddly about leeds United . That's much better.
|
|
|
Post by 3Pipe on Aug 28, 2014 21:02:40 GMT 1
Why not, are they in limited supply?? Plenty of good reasons why we don't need a front page full of threads about the same topic.
|
|
|
Post by gledholt terrier on Aug 28, 2014 21:06:52 GMT 1
Wings Don't understand?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 28, 2014 21:38:37 GMT 1
Me neither?
|
|
|
Post by barnsleydaz on Aug 28, 2014 21:42:28 GMT 1
Why not, are they in limited supply?? Plenty of good reasons why we don't need a front page full of threads about the same topic. Hmmm, maybe, but I can't think of a good enough reason that allows someone to dictate who should start new threads on what. Unless they own this forum and the rules are clearly stated. Or are you saying that anyone who wants to start a new thread should first read through all previous thread to ensure the subject has not been covered elsewhere.
|
|
|
Post by 3Pipe on Aug 28, 2014 21:47:51 GMT 1
Plenty of good reasons why we don't need a front page full of threads about the same topic. Hmmm, maybe, but I can't think of a good enough reason that allows someone to dictate who should start new threads on what. Unless they own this forum and the rules are clearly stated. Or are you saying that anyone who wants to start a new thread should first read through all previous thread to ensure the subject has not been covered elsewhere. At least look at the titles on the front page. That's what I do.
|
|
|
Post by barnsleydaz on Aug 28, 2014 21:53:20 GMT 1
Hmmm, maybe, but I can't think of a good enough reason that allows someone to dictate who should start new threads on what. Unless they own this forum and the rules are clearly stated. Or are you saying that anyone who wants to start a new thread should first read through all previous thread to ensure the subject has not been covered elsewhere. At least look at the titles on the front page. That's what I do. Agreed, thats what I do, but there's a little bit too much "holier than thou" on here and it starts to grate from time to time.
|
|
|
The Hock
Aug 28, 2014 21:56:19 GMT 1
via mobile
Post by Stiggy on Aug 28, 2014 21:56:19 GMT 1
Too many chiefs on this forum! So the OP didn't see there was already a tread to discuss this. Whoopedo...shoot him FFS
|
|