|
|
Post by ritchie on Sept 17, 2014 1:15:31 GMT 1
I was all for easing him in last season and wasnt one crying for him to be starting every game, but given how we've looked the last few games i think its time for this lad to be brought in.
We are completely predictable and have zero creativity or drive. Scannel showed what we're missing when he came on but we all know he lacks end product and lolley has probably already, or close to, matched his stats. With the defense looking fairly solid i think we can take the risk and have lolley do a bit of swashbuckling
for leeds i'd have
smith-hudson-lynch*-robinson
--------------peltier
-butterfield-----------coady
---------------lolley
-------stead**----wells
*wallace if not fit
**new striker if possible
Id keep pelts in midfield as he will be bang up for it, and with him in there and the defense we have a solid base to let lolley drift about
|
|
|
|
Post by ACW on Sept 17, 2014 1:18:05 GMT 1
I was all for easing him in last season and wasnt one crying for him to be starting every game, but given how we've looked the last few games i think its time for this lad to be brought in. We are completely predictable and have zero creativity or drive. Scannel showed what we're missing when he came on but we all know he lacks end product and lolley has probably already, or close to, matched his stats. With the defense looking fairly solid i think we can take the risk and have lolley do a bit of swashbucklingfor leeds i'd have smith-hudson-lynch*-robinson --------------peltier -butterfield-----------coady ---------------lolley -------stead**----wells *wallace if not fit **new striker if possible Id keep pelts in midfield as he will be bang up for it, and with him in there and the defense we have a solid base to let lolley drift about Swashbuckling? I suspect that's a swear word in the Powell house.  |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 17, 2014 9:17:10 GMT 1
Lolley looked very naive on Saturday. He lost the ball through carelessly running into trouble at least twice on Saturday. I like that he's direct and think he will be an excellent player, but think it would be very dangerous playing him on Saturday.
Scannell and Ward have looked much, much better whenever I have seen them this season. Ward started last night well, but faded and Scannell was the better of our front three in the second half.
My team of choice would be;
Smithies
Peltier Hudson Lynch Robinson
Hogg Coady
Butterfield
Scannell Stead Wells
Thought our midfield looked much more balanced last night than on Saturday, though Peltier slows us down too much in possession. The real weak spot, and I hate to single people out, was Stead. He tried and he does good things, but of the balls that go to him the majority come straight back and those that he does manage to hold up are often given away through poor control or careless passing. We've done some great business this summer, but I'm afraid we look set to struggle without a striker. We don't need anyone flash... Just someone capable of winning the ball and laying it off.
|
|
Amigo
Jimmy Glazzard Terrier
Posts: 4,824
|
Post by Amigo on Sept 17, 2014 10:10:42 GMT 1
Until Lolley learns to release the ball I think he's a hinderance. He gets it, beats a man maybe 2 then keeps going until he's tackled. Twice he lost the ball in the middle of the field on Saturday and once he went for an impossible shot when I think it was Smith who would've been through down the side of the area if he'd looked up.
|
|
|
|
Post by truebluesid on Sept 17, 2014 11:27:33 GMT 1
Smithies
Pelts Hudson Lynch Robinson
Scannell Coady Hogg Ward/Lolley
Butterfield
Wells
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 17, 2014 11:44:39 GMT 1
Smithies
Peltier Hudson Lynch Dixon
Coady Butterfield
Scannell Majewski Ward
Wells
or put Hogg in Butterfields role if fit, with Butterfield replacing Majewski behind Wells
|
|
|
|
Post by Is It Eidur Gudjohnsen on Sept 17, 2014 11:47:32 GMT 1
I was all for easing him in last season and wasnt one crying for him to be starting every game, but given how we've looked the last few games i think its time for this lad to be brought in. We are completely predictable and have zero creativity or drive. Scannel showed what we're missing when he came on but we all know he lacks end product and lolley has probably already, or close to, matched his stats. With the defense looking fairly solid i think we can take the risk and have lolley do a bit of swashbucklingfor leeds i'd have smith-hudson-lynch*-robinson --------------peltier -butterfield-----------coady ---------------lolley -------stead**----wells *wallace if not fit **new striker if possible Id keep pelts in midfield as he will be bang up for it, and with him in there and the defense we have a solid base to let lolley drift about Swashbuckling? I suspect that's a swear word in the Powell house. Maybe like myself he has been seen the CBeebies show with his kids one time too many!!! |
|
diceman
Iain Dunn Terrier
Posts: 570
|
Post by diceman on Sept 17, 2014 11:57:46 GMT 1
Lolley didn't fill me with confidence against bro on Saturday. He looked unsure of his positioning off the ball. Also after a couple of mistakes it seemed like nobody would pass to him. A loan spell in league one may do him well.
|
|
|
|
Post by hughphamism on Sept 17, 2014 12:54:38 GMT 1
Swashbuckling? I suspect that's a swear word in the Powell house. Maybe like myself he has been seen the CBeebies show with his kids one time too many!!! Eye patch Pirate hat Swashbuckle cheer AAHHAARR!! How about getting Hammill back in the team. 8th best for assists in the division last season and best for Town. I see CP saying he's had a few knocks - that's the first I'd heard mention of it. He wasn't listed as injured by previous managers. www.football-league.co.uk/page/DivisionalAssists/0,,10794~20137,00.html |
|
|
|
Post by thrice on Sept 17, 2014 12:59:58 GMT 1
He has done nothing to win Powell's favour yet.
Scannell is the one who will have staked his claim for a starting spot after last nights impact.
|
|
|
|
Post by Sugy , Paignton Devon Terrier on Sept 17, 2014 13:11:19 GMT 1
Town got there only 3 point win by beat Reading in what i believe was a 4 -3 -3 with Bunn playing up front with Wells |
|
|
|
Post by Is It Eidur Gudjohnsen on Sept 17, 2014 13:28:39 GMT 1
Town got there only 3 point win by beat Reading in what i believe was a 4 -3 -3 with Bunn playing up front with Wells Sssh! Dont let football managers hear you say that. They may think that looking at past good performances and taking the good from those and replicating it is a good thing! Then what would happen to coaching manual sales! It would be a worry indeed |
|
|
|
Post by waltzingthecowshed on Sept 17, 2014 14:12:07 GMT 1
Smithies Peltier Hudson Lynch Dixon Coady Butterfield Scannell Majewski Ward Wells or put Hogg in Butterfields role if fit, with Butterfield replacing Majewski behind Wells Got to be this but no way will CP go with it imo . Stead shouldn't be anything than the different option last 20mins |
|
|
|
Post by waltzingthecowshed on Sept 17, 2014 14:16:12 GMT 1
Lolley didn't fill me with confidence against bro on Saturday. He looked unsure of his positioning off the ball. Also after a couple of mistakes it seemed like nobody would pass to him. A loan spell in league one may do him well. Duane apparently had the same affliction called having a go and tryiong tom do something different, when Butterfield Coady(was awful last night) Peltier Ward Hammill or any other midfielder lose the ball theres not a clamour to loan them out so why Lolley ? |
|
|
|
Post by ShortbreadPete on Sept 17, 2014 14:20:28 GMT 1
Lolley has hardly had a chance yet and needs regular games to learn and show what he can do - there's a great player there in time. Some people have no patience and are so critical it's unbelievable.
|
|
diceman
Iain Dunn Terrier
Posts: 570
|
Post by diceman on Sept 17, 2014 20:29:00 GMT 1
Lolley didn't fill me with confidence against bro on Saturday. He looked unsure of his positioning off the ball. Also after a couple of mistakes it seemed like nobody would pass to him. A loan spell in league one may do him well. Duane apparently had the same affliction called having a go and tryiong tom do something different, when Butterfield Coady(was awful last night) Peltier Ward Hammill or any other midfielder lose the ball theres not a clamour to loan them out so why Lolley ? Because of his age and the jump in divisions he has made. I think with some regular starts at a slightly lower level, will bring confidence and some understanding. Then bring him back in Jan. Just a thought. |
|
|
|
Post by Giggity on Sept 17, 2014 20:54:37 GMT 1
Why not play Majewski and play Lolley out wide in his natural position? With Powell essentially playing four defensive minded defenders and at least one defensive midfielder, we don't really need to be cautious with our attacking players.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 17, 2014 22:04:27 GMT 1
Lolley looked very naive on Saturday. He lost the ball through carelessly running into trouble at least twice on Saturday. I like that he's direct and think he will be an excellent player, but think it would be very dangerous playing him on Saturday. Scannell and Ward have looked much, much better whenever I have seen them this season. Ward started last night well, but faded and Scannell was the better of our front three in the second half. My team of choice would be; Smithies Peltier Hudson Lynch Robinson Hogg Coady Butterfield Scannell Stead Wells Thought our midfield looked much more balanced last night than on Saturday, though Peltier slows us down too much in possession. The real weak spot, and I hate to single people out, was Stead. He tried and he does good things, but of the balls that go to him the majority come straight back and those that he does manage to hold up are often given away through poor control or careless passing. We've done some great business this summer, but I'm afraid we look set to struggle without a striker. We don't need anyone flash... Just someone capable of winning the ball and laying it off. Saved me posting. Agree with all this. The only thing Id do is play Ward instead of stead. |
|
