|
Post by Carl2291 on Sept 20, 2014 14:12:53 GMT 1
Team - Smithies; Robinson, Lynch, Hudson, Peltier (c); Coady, Hogg, Butterfield; Bunn, Wells, Scannell (DTS)
Bench - Joe Murphy, Paul Dixon, Danny Ward, Jonathan Stead, Murray Wallace, Tommy Smith, Radoslaw Majewski (DTS)
-
Leeds - Silvestri, Berardi, Bellusci, Pearce, Warnock, Austin, Cook, Bianchi, Sloth, Doukara, Antenucci
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 20, 2014 14:16:22 GMT 1
4-2-3-1?
|
|
|
Post by H7 on Sept 20, 2014 14:18:05 GMT 1
much better.... looks as if probably 433 in attack 451 in defence
|
|
|
Post by htfcfcfc on Sept 20, 2014 14:19:41 GMT 1
Maybe the penny has dropped....
|
|
|
Post by terriersyndrome on Sept 20, 2014 14:20:04 GMT 1
That makes sense, unless he's playing Bunn up with Wells? Like the sounds of the team anyway.. Positive! Come on town!
|
|
|
Post by Baby Ate My Eight Ball on Sept 20, 2014 14:21:40 GMT 1
Like the look of that team with premier back at rb. Get the ball out to Scannell early doors and get him running at his man, he's our match winner here.
|
|
|
Post by Floyds on Sept 20, 2014 14:22:04 GMT 1
Surely (if anything) it's 4-3-2-1 (or 4-5-1)?
|
|
deadleg
David Wagner Terrier
Posts: 2,897
|
Post by deadleg on Sept 20, 2014 14:22:07 GMT 1
Looks a much more balanced team to me. If we were going to revert to this anyway it seems weird that we went so all out defensively for the last two games, obviously a clean sheet was important but it almost seems like it was prioritised over getting as many points as possible. Or maybe CP has just learned from those two games and has changed things accordingly? Good sign if so.
I'd be happy with a team like that for away games and maybe putting Butterfield alongside Coady with Majewski in front at home.
|
|
|
Post by thomo on Sept 20, 2014 14:22:30 GMT 1
Really glad he's changed it around a bit. Peltier gets a chance in his proper position. Scannel and Bunn to support wells. Hogg and Coady to sit perhaps with Butterfield able to break forward. Come on town!
|
|
|
Post by swollentoe on Sept 20, 2014 14:23:50 GMT 1
I'm in peacock oops
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 20, 2014 14:24:13 GMT 1
That makes sense, unless he's playing Bunn up with Wells? Like the sounds of the team anyway.. Positive! Come on town! Hope he's playing Bunn and Scanz wide and asking them to support Wells as and when. Hogg's a worry in there (not played much), but we'll see.
|
|
Amigo
Jimmy Glazzard Terrier
Posts: 4,824
|
Post by Amigo on Sept 20, 2014 14:25:46 GMT 1
Much better. I'd probably go with Majewski instead of Hogg but being away and having had our problems at the back I can understand this, think this team might get us a win today.
|
|
|
Post by mykindatown on Sept 20, 2014 14:30:03 GMT 1
Ml had word in his shelll like ~ re, round pegs n round holes
|
|
|
Post by bristolterrier on Sept 20, 2014 14:31:26 GMT 1
Much better. I'd probably go with Majewski instead of Hogg but being away and having had our problems at the back I can understand this, think this team might get us a win today. Hogg was excellent alongside Butterfield at Reading with Coady in front of back four.Just need to pass the ball now and restrict the Hooooooof.Come on Town.
|
|
|
Post by terriersyndrome on Sept 20, 2014 14:36:03 GMT 1
That makes sense, unless he's playing Bunn up with Wells? Like the sounds of the team anyway.. Positive! Come on town! Hope he's playing Bunn and Scanz wide and asking them to support Wells as and when. Hogg's a worry in there (not played much), but we'll see. The formation should allow Butterfield more freedom to roam & influence the game in the final 3rd.. He can make all the difference in the amount of chances we create.
|
|
|
Post by burgerhitsthebar on Sept 20, 2014 14:37:22 GMT 1
Yes please that is more like it come on now u fucking TERRIERS!!!!
|
|
|
Post by WirralTerrier on Sept 20, 2014 14:39:56 GMT 1
im hoping this is 433/451 but I wouldn't be surprised if hes still playing 442 and having butterfield out on right again and either bunn or scannell up front with wells. if it is 433/451 then I just hope we support wells otherwise its a pointless system as the ball will just continually keep coming back at us as wells cant hold anything up unless he has players around him, we need bunn and scannell to have good performances for us to win today!
|
|
|
Post by ritchie on Sept 20, 2014 14:42:45 GMT 1
Feel a lot better seeing that
|
|
|
Post by Doc Halladay 32 on Sept 20, 2014 14:50:02 GMT 1
Ml had word in his shelll like ~ re, round pegs n round holes Or first choice Hogg back available so doesn't have to use Peltier in there.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 20, 2014 14:50:52 GMT 1
|
|
|
Post by ritchie on Sept 20, 2014 14:52:26 GMT 1
What is kieran on about? Its stuff like that that pisses me off about him
|
|
|
Post by ringdisco on Sept 20, 2014 14:55:42 GMT 1
What is kieran on about? Its stuff like that that pisses me off about him What's he saying?
|
|
|
Post by malhamterrier on Sept 20, 2014 15:00:10 GMT 1
Much better line up Bunn can do the business and put Wells on track.....I can see a positive result UTT
|
|
|
Post by ritchie on Sept 20, 2014 15:00:14 GMT 1
What is kieran on about? Its stuff like that that pisses me off about him What's he saying? "recipe for disaster when the board start getting involved in team matters" Making out dixon is hard done by not being in the team and it's because the board have put robinson in the team. think the fella is a bit of a stirrer.
|
|
|
Post by examiner on Sept 20, 2014 15:01:31 GMT 1
Hello, my name's Andy Jackson at the Examiner - or Unexaminer/Unexamined/That Rag, depending on your preference... We're trying something different this season and are covering games live with tweets, reports, pics, updates etc all in one liveblog. If you get chance take a look at today's liveblog here www.examiner.co.uk/sport/football/news/live-leeds-united-v-huddersfield-7801679 and let us know what you think - good, bad, indifferent, "usual Examiner rubbish" etc...
|
|
|
Post by rantinray on Sept 20, 2014 15:03:29 GMT 1
"recipe for disaster when the board start getting involved in team matters" Making out dixon is hard done by not being in the team and it's because the board have put robinson in the team. think the fella is a bit of a stirrer. I think he has a point. Dixon for me is a decent player. But we dont select the team.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 20, 2014 15:05:32 GMT 1
Much better line up. I'd have Ward or majewski ahead of bunn otherwise as is.
|
|
|
Post by ritchie on Sept 20, 2014 15:08:54 GMT 1
"recipe for disaster when the board start getting involved in team matters" Making out dixon is hard done by not being in the team and it's because the board have put robinson in the team. think the fella is a bit of a stirrer. I think he has a point. Dixon for me is a decent player. But we dont select the team. If he had just said that he thinks he deserves to be in the team that would be fine...but he starts hinting at a conspiracy - personally i dont think dixon is right cracky so am not surprised he's not in the team at the moment. previous managers dont seem to have rated him much either
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 20, 2014 15:09:19 GMT 1
How often do town corners turn into the opposition attacking
|
|
|
Post by rantinray on Sept 20, 2014 15:13:02 GMT 1
Much better line up. I'd have Ward or majewski ahead of bunn otherwise as is. Me also. Dont think Bunn has the quality which we need. Lots of effort from the player but a little suspect on his overall abilities.
|
|