Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 23, 2014 18:40:52 GMT 1
Have you looked at the bottom three of the Greedy League?
Is anybody surprised?
|
|
|
|
Post by Christ in Shades (art) on Nov 23, 2014 18:44:14 GMT 1
QPR....oooooppps spent a shed load of brass but will still end up going down.
|
|
|
|
Post by Solid Snake on Nov 23, 2014 18:48:30 GMT 1
Quite surprised at Leicester. I thought that they would of got off to a better start
|
|
|
|
Post by galpharm2400 on Nov 23, 2014 18:51:50 GMT 1
just watched the most 'effective' player in the premier league and he didn't cost a fortune and he does not carry a 'huge' reputation..
Ericksen at Spurs...
|
|
|
|
Post by kennyk2 on Nov 23, 2014 18:57:13 GMT 1
just watched the most 'effective' player in the premier league and he didn't cost a fortune and he does not carry a 'huge' reputation.. Ericksen at Spurs... A Dane and Spurs paid only £11 million for him - that's a Killing  |
|
|
|
Post by ACW on Nov 23, 2014 18:59:09 GMT 1
Give it another few weeks and Liverpool may well be in the bottom three. They can't score, can't defend and I would argue, on current form, they are the worst team in the Premier League. I wouldn't back them to beat Burnley at the moment.
|
|
|
|
Post by goodshot (FGS) on Nov 23, 2014 21:16:14 GMT 1
just watched the most 'effective' player in the premier league and he didn't cost a fortune and he does not carry a 'huge' reputation.. Ericksen at Spurs... Spurs are a shambles. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 23, 2014 21:50:26 GMT 1
Scary isn't it? Leicester ripped the championship a new arsehole.
|
|
midlander
David Wagner Terrier
[M0:0]
Posts: 2,856
|
Post by midlander on Nov 23, 2014 22:20:55 GMT 1
just watched the most 'effective' player in the premier league and he didn't cost a fortune and he does not carry a 'huge' reputation.. Ericksen at Spurs... Always had a massive reputation as a youngster, coming through at Ajax although it's taken him time to settle here. I thought at the time that Spurs got a bargain when they paid £11m, as he has the potential to be one of the very best in Europe - whether he'll realise that potential or not though is open to debate. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 23, 2014 22:22:50 GMT 1
just watched the most 'effective' player in the premier league and he didn't cost a fortune and he does not carry a 'huge' reputation.. Ericksen at Spurs... Always had a massive reputation as a youngster, coming through at Ajax although it's taken him time to settle here. I thought at the time that Spurs got a bargain when they paid £11m, as he has the potential to be one of the very best in Europe - whether he'll realise that potential or not though is open to debate. With the amount of money Spurs have wasted on pure drivel, it was well past time that they hit on something good! |
|
|
|
Post by kosi on Nov 23, 2014 22:26:24 GMT 1
Liverpool and arsenal need to spend a bit more!!
|
|
midlander
David Wagner Terrier
[M0:0]
Posts: 2,856
|
Post by midlander on Nov 23, 2014 22:41:34 GMT 1
Always had a massive reputation as a youngster, coming through at Ajax although it's taken him time to settle here. I thought at the time that Spurs got a bargain when they paid £11m, as he has the potential to be one of the very best in Europe - whether he'll realise that potential or not though is open to debate. With the amount of money Spurs have wasted on pure drivel, it was well past time that they hit on something good! They actually sign good players, but seem to lack the nous to buy players to fit into a way of playing or to compliment what they already have. They'll buy three or four creative, attacking footballers, but neglect to buy a ball winner, etc... Lamela was always going to be a massive risk as he's an out and out flair player and very few of them ever do well in England. They needed to build a hard-working and solid midfield behind Lamela and Ericksen to enable them two to do what they do best - roam free and create. Unfortunately, Spurs' DNA doesn't enable them to have too many defensive players - never has. |
|
