Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 20, 2014 18:02:43 GMT 1
Because that's how we played under him.
Clueless, no pace no desire NO FUCKING IDEA.
Passing it about at the back, inviting them onto us then guess what.... Yep we lose the ball 2 mins later 1-0.
That was totally unacceptable.
|
|
|
|
Post by terrierfortythree on Dec 20, 2014 19:38:26 GMT 1
thought exactly the same was like a flashback
|
|
|
|
Post by fredcarno1 on Dec 20, 2014 19:40:20 GMT 1
In fairness to Robins we went the same way under Grayson.
|
|
|
|
Post by htfcterrier23 on Dec 20, 2014 19:43:49 GMT 1
For the majority of Robins' reign, we were much better than we have been under Powell – better results and more entertaining. People forget that because of the poor end to his stint as manager. But still, his overall record was better than Powell's at this point.
|
|
|
|
Post by AndySk on Dec 21, 2014 13:40:12 GMT 1
Least Robins would've tried changing things.
That was the most worrying thing yest, Powell was clearly happy with how things were going for 70 odd mins. You must get a massively different view from the touchline.
And bringing Lolley on after 88mins, yeah that'll do it, what's the point
|
|
|
|
Post by terrierfortythree on Dec 21, 2014 14:02:30 GMT 1
seems to be a theme with powell that he doesnt like using his subs, 5 nil down at norwich last week and only used one sub throughout the half
|
|
