|
Post by waltzingthecowshed on Jan 28, 2015 15:30:18 GMT 1
Hogg, Edgar or Gobern ?
3-5-2
------------------------------------------------------Smithies -------------------------Smith----------------------Hudson------------------Lynch ------Scannell----------------Coady----------------Butterfield--------------Hogg--------------Robinson ----------------------------------------Wells-----------------------JV
Subs: Allinson, Wallace, Dixon, Lolley, Edgar, Gobern, Bunn
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 28, 2015 15:33:43 GMT 1
it's the same as last time.... Great why can't we inconvience their fans for a change! Because that would be the right thing to do.....
|
|
|
Post by Nickhudds.UTT on Jan 28, 2015 16:45:02 GMT 1
Hi All I cannot wait for Saturday it will be huge game in west yorkshire come on you terriers. Have you been to any of the Eebygum classico before ? Bit tasty. We recite our famous folk like David Preece , Harold Wilson....
|
|
|
Post by Doc Halladay 32 on Jan 28, 2015 17:15:17 GMT 1
Chance of a stream for this match? Hmmmmm didn't you once say this of me even though I live overseas "Coming from the guy who spends most of his week searching for Wiziwig links so he can watch the game on his computer each Saturday. Maybe if you actually stepped foot outside of your house and go down to the match every now and again instead of watching it on your computer, you might see the game from another perspective?" Read more: downatthemac.proboards.com/search/results?who_at_least_one=6733&what_at_least_one=wiziwig&display_as=0#ixzz3Q8K4vOvQTo answer your original question... No Boro at Brentford is available though
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 28, 2015 17:22:59 GMT 1
Nick ...
|
|
|
Post by Nickhudds.UTT on Jan 28, 2015 17:29:25 GMT 1
|
|
|
Post by terrierng on Jan 28, 2015 17:41:12 GMT 1
Chairman Dean Hoyle will hold a Q&A with fans ahead of Saturday's game vs Leeds t.co/xE088std92 All the fans who question the club and the way it's run, get your sen's down there and ask away. Will they fuck
|
|
|
Post by Nickhudds.UTT on Jan 28, 2015 17:46:05 GMT 1
They won't go down Ben lad. Nice idea though.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 28, 2015 18:19:28 GMT 1
All the fans who question the club and the way it's run, get your sen's down there and ask away. Will they fuck Thing is, there is a perfect oppertunity for those that have concerns over how the clubs being run to ask questions. Calling Christ in Shades (art)!
|
|
|
Post by COWleySHED on Jan 28, 2015 18:28:18 GMT 1
I agree and reckon the boy and barrel can hold leeds fans after all they hosted Barnsley last game of season 2 years ago when both clubs potentially could of gone down
|
|
|
Post by amoeba on Jan 28, 2015 18:29:50 GMT 1
All the fans who question the club and the way it's run, get your sen's down there and ask away. Will they fuck To misquote the white shite 'will they go to canalside? will they fuck,will they fuck' Sent from my HTC One_M8 using proboards
|
|
|
Post by Doc Halladay 32 on Jan 28, 2015 19:00:36 GMT 1
Thing is, there is a perfect oppertunity for those that have concerns over how the clubs being run to ask questions. Calling Christ in Shades (art)! Haven't you heard Ben ...... Canalside is the wrong side of the ground
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 28, 2015 19:08:22 GMT 1
Thing is, there is a perfect oppertunity for those that have concerns over how the clubs being run to ask questions. Calling Christ in Shades (art)! Haven't you heard Ben ...... Canalside is the wrong side of the ground I live behind enemy lines in Bradford and I don't struggle to get to it!!
|
|
|
Post by terrierng on Jan 28, 2015 19:32:34 GMT 1
Thing is, there is a perfect oppertunity for those that have concerns over how the clubs being run to ask questions. Calling Christ in Shades (art)! Haven't you heard Ben ...... Canalside is the wrong side of the ground No bull shit excuses...put up or shut up all you keyboard warriors
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 28, 2015 20:38:12 GMT 1
How much is it to be a member ?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 28, 2015 20:41:17 GMT 1
How much is it to be a member ? Not sure it would be worthwhile to take out full membership at this time of year, but £2 I believe on the day.
|
|
|
Post by Porrohman on Jan 28, 2015 20:47:56 GMT 1
How much is it to be a member ? Not sure it would be worthwhile to take out full membership at this time of year, but £2 I believe on the day. My membership there's always been January to December. Sent from my SM-G900F using proboards
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 28, 2015 20:59:42 GMT 1
Not sure it would be worthwhile to take out full membership at this time of year, but £2 I believe on the day. My membership there's always been January to December. Sent from my SM-G900F using proboards Thanks, got my first membership with my season card this season, when I enquired during last season I was advised to wait. Possible that has now altered and can join anytime, £15 per annum.
|
|
|
Post by Porrohman on Jan 28, 2015 21:43:51 GMT 1
My membership there's always been January to December. Sent from my SM-G900F using proboards Thanks, got my first membership with my season card this season, when I enquired during last season I was advised to wait. Possible that has now altered and can join anytime, £15 per annum. It could be that I've been a member there since about 1993, which may also explain my fee being £9/ year Sent from my SM-G900F using proboards
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 28, 2015 21:54:55 GMT 1
Thanks, got my first membership with my season card this season, when I enquired during last season I was advised to wait. Possible that has now altered and can join anytime, £15 per annum. It could be that I've been a member there since about 1993, which may also explain my fee being £9/ year Sent from my SM-G900F using proboards It certainly does.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 29, 2015 22:51:16 GMT 1
|
|
|
Post by colnevalleyblue on Jan 29, 2015 23:08:01 GMT 1
Not sure Austin will be leaving, I read Redfearn saying he was not for sale in an interview today.
|
|
|
Post by Sugy , Paignton Devon Terrier on Jan 29, 2015 23:52:11 GMT 1
The introduction of the F F P rules must be the biggest farse the game has ever seen. Cheating Leeds Utd were one of three teams given a transfer embargo by the football league for clearly breaking these rules . We then see Redfearn finding a way around these rules, and boasting about his latest two new signings of Bambi and Ngoyi which could start against town. Cellino was a proven to be a dishonest man with a mentioned " first grade conviction" to his name , and that surely should mean a life ban from owning any football club. It makes you realise how lucky we are to have such a Honest , rule abiding , and fair chairman in Mr Dean Hoyle,and wonder how many other sceletons are waiting to come out of this Leeds Utd coffin.
|
|
|
Post by gledholt terrier on Jan 30, 2015 0:09:18 GMT 1
The introduction of the F F P rules must be the biggest farse the game has ever seen. Cheating Leeds Utd were one of three teams given a transfer embargo by the football league for clearly breaking these rules . We then see Redfearn finding a way around these rules, and boasting about his latest two new signings of Bambi and Ngoyi which could start against town. Cellino was a proven to be a dishonest man with a mentioned " first grade conviction" to his name , and that surely should mean a life ban from owning any football club. It makes you realise how lucky we are to have such a Honest , rule abiding , and fair chairman in Mr Dean Hoyle,and wonder how many other sceletons are waiting to come out of this Leeds Utd coffin. Redfearn has acted within the rules.
|
|
|
Post by Sugy , Paignton Devon Terrier on Jan 30, 2015 0:27:13 GMT 1
The introduction of the F F P rules must be the biggest farse the game has ever seen. Cheating Leeds Utd were one of three teams given a transfer embargo by the football league for clearly breaking these rules . We then see Redfearn finding a way around these rules, and boasting about his latest two new signings of Bambi and Ngoyi which could start against town. Cellino was a proven to be a dishonest man with a mentioned " first grade conviction" to his name , and that surely should mean a life ban from owning any football club. It makes you realise how lucky we are to have such a Honest , rule abiding , and fair chairman in Mr Dean Hoyle,and wonder how many other sceletons are waiting to come out of this Leeds Utd coffin. Redfearn has acted within the rules. I did not say that Redfearn had broken the rules. My point being - any transfer embargo given by the football league should mean exactly what it says. Both Q P R and Leicester got promoted to the premier league by actually breaking these rules , and a reported £40 million fine comes nowhere near the mentioned £120 million promotion premier league honey pot both clubs recieved . Then to take the piss big time , both clubs are given £60 million parachute payments if relegated. Someone might be able to explain where the word " FAIR " fits into these rules.
|
|
|
Post by gledholt terrier on Jan 30, 2015 0:55:01 GMT 1
Redfearn has acted within the rules. I did not say that Redfearn had broken the rules. My point being a transfer embargo should mean exactly what it says. How on earth are fans expected to understand these confusing F F P rules with all this red tape surrounding them. Both Q P R and Leicester got promoted to the premier league by breaking these rules ,and a reported £40 million fine comes nowhere near the mentioned £120 million promotion premier league honey pot both clubs recieved . Then to take the piss big time , both clubs are given £60 million parachute payments if relegated. Someone might be able to explain where the word " FAIR " fits into these rules. The Football League rules are determined by majority votes of the clubs themselves. All of those clubs, including Town, have their own agenda and, like with any democratic organisation, rules will be the result of compromise after compromise, even assuming that a 75% plus majority understand that financial control is self preserving. Throw in foreign owners and the odd megalomaniac (no names but I think you can guess) and you don't get instant gratification. FFP is hugely complex, including the imposition of penalties. The first step has been to put pressure and scrutiny on Leeds, Blackburn and Forest - all 3 are on a yellow card and are under restraint. More are likely to follow once the FL has scrutinised accounts further and asked additional questions. There is no way Redfearn is "finding a way round" the rules - they will know precisely what they can and cannot do under the restriction (and in their case, that means getting rid of at least 2, possibly 3 - Austen - and paying significantly less to new on loan players). I'm boring myself now on FFP, but we have a chairman who has decided that implementing and following the rules is beneficial to HTFC - slow and frustrating as the process is and will be, it is still better than an unregulated free for all which puts us at greater disadvantage from financial cheats.
|
|
|
Post by Sugy , Paignton Devon Terrier on Jan 30, 2015 1:13:52 GMT 1
I did not say that Redfearn had broken the rules. My point being a transfer embargo should mean exactly what it says. How on earth are fans expected to understand these confusing F F P rules with all this red tape surrounding them. Both Q P R and Leicester got promoted to the premier league by breaking these rules ,and a reported £40 million fine comes nowhere near the mentioned £120 million promotion premier league honey pot both clubs recieved . Then to take the piss big time , both clubs are given £60 million parachute payments if relegated. Someone might be able to explain where the word " FAIR " fits into these rules. The Football League rules are determined by majority votes of the clubs themselves. All of those clubs, including Town, have their own agenda and, like with any democratic organisation, rules will be the result of compromise after compromise, even assuming that a 75% plus majority understand that financial control is self preserving. Throw in foreign owners and the odd megalomaniac (no names but I think you can guess) and you don't get instant gratification. FFP is hugely complex, including the imposition of penalties. The first step has been to put pressure and scrutiny on Leeds, Blackburn and Forest - all 3 are on a yellow card and are under restraint. More are likely to follow once the FL has scrutinised accounts further and asked additional questions. There is no way Redfearn is "finding a way round" the rules - they will know precisely what they can and cannot do under the restriction (and in their case, that means getting rid of at least 2, possibly 3 - Austen - and paying significantly less to new on loan players). I'm boring myself now on FFP, but we have a chairman who has decided that implementing and following the rules is beneficial to HTFC - slow and frustrating as the process is and will be, it is still better than an unregulated free for all which puts us at greater disadvantage from financial cheats. I thought the word "EMBARGO " meant ban. Banned from making any transfers . Time to read the small print.
|
|
|
Post by gledholt terrier on Jan 30, 2015 2:45:05 GMT 1
The Football League rules are determined by majority votes of the clubs themselves. All of those clubs, including Town, have their own agenda and, like with any democratic organisation, rules will be the result of compromise after compromise, even assuming that a 75% plus majority understand that financial control is self preserving. Throw in foreign owners and the odd megalomaniac (no names but I think you can guess) and you don't get instant gratification. FFP is hugely complex, including the imposition of penalties. The first step has been to put pressure and scrutiny on Leeds, Blackburn and Forest - all 3 are on a yellow card and are under restraint. More are likely to follow once the FL has scrutinised accounts further and asked additional questions. There is no way Redfearn is "finding a way round" the rules - they will know precisely what they can and cannot do under the restriction (and in their case, that means getting rid of at least 2, possibly 3 - Austen - and paying significantly less to new on loan players). I'm boring myself now on FFP, but we have a chairman who has decided that implementing and following the rules is beneficial to HTFC - slow and frustrating as the process is and will be, it is still better than an unregulated free for all which puts us at greater disadvantage from financial cheats. I thought the word "EMBARGO " meant ban. Banned from making any transfers . Time to read the small print. I wish it did mean what you correctly state it means. This is the small print; Under the transfer embargoes, the three clubs will be prohibited from signing any new players - either on a permanent or loan deal - unless they have 24 or fewer "established players", which is described as 24 players aged 21 or over that have made at least five starts for the club.
|
|
|
Post by detox on Jan 30, 2015 9:01:24 GMT 1
I thought the word "EMBARGO " meant ban. Banned from making any transfers . Time to read the small print. I wish it did mean what you correctly state it means. This is the small print; Under the transfer embargoes, the three clubs will be prohibited from signing any new players - either on a permanent or loan deal - unless they have 24 or fewer "established players", which is described as 24 players aged 21 or over that have made at least five starts for the club. What makes FFP farcical to me is how long it takes, after the event, to determine if the rules have been broken, and then for sanctions to be imposed. The season has finished months ago, and here we are half way through the next season. The 'unfair advantage' these clubs gained occured during the last season so the FL need to impose the sanctions during the period they are being broken .surely that is only fair to the other clubs in the league ? If you consider a club relegated because they lost to a club breaking the rules, what come back do they have at this stage ? Similarly teams who might miss out on promotion, or the play offs for the same reason ? I don't know any businesses that only do accounts after the year is over, they all do monthly accounts so they know where they are going financially, so why can they not produce figures for the FFP regulator the same way ? In fact, if I was Dean I'd be demanding to know every month how near or far from the FFP limits I was, wouldn't you ? If that system was in place then you could apply points deductions for every month they are exceeding the limits, during the same season. You can't tell me these big clubs don't have sophisticated financial computer systems, and qualified accountants who can assimilate the figures and do projections up to the end of the season. The sting for clubs thinking they can fiddle the numbers all year would be an accumulative points deduction and a hefty fine. It's not beyond the wit of man to I wouldn't have thought to implement a system that measures FFP month by month, because that is the only fair way to operate FFP, fair to the clubs who are complying and fair the fans.
|
|
|
Post by bluedogs, Esq. on Jan 30, 2015 9:17:28 GMT 1
Forget about ffp we are the Yorkshire club and we don't like spending owt
|
|