|
Post by Cole on Apr 15, 2015 21:29:49 GMT 1
And I'm from Barnsley too. So I'm very protective over mine stuff.
|
|
|
Post by shatterrier on Apr 15, 2015 21:41:09 GMT 1
Good job there wasn't two otherwise we'd have no fucking industry left! but good job there was one or we'd all be Argentinian
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 15, 2015 21:45:44 GMT 1
I am pretty sure that Thatcher will not be at the match on Saturday. However, Derek Hatton might put in an appearance....
|
|
|
Post by 3Pipe on Apr 15, 2015 21:45:56 GMT 1
Good job there wasn't two otherwise we'd have no fucking industry left! but good job there was one or we'd all be Argentinian
|
|
|
Post by Frankiesleftpeg on Apr 15, 2015 21:50:31 GMT 1
Good job there wasn't two otherwise we'd have no fucking industry left! but good job there was one or we'd all be Argentinian Not quite true, but it was a policy I supported.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 15, 2015 22:24:12 GMT 1
No, it's just a pathetic comment to make. You're the wanker. Fuck off pinko boy. Yawn, okay mate.
|
|
|
Post by Automatic(EPBS) on Apr 15, 2015 22:32:46 GMT 1
Did you have to google that Tosh?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 16, 2015 10:32:50 GMT 1
Did you have to google that Tosh? Tosh? I thought that was what you were talking.
|
|
|
Post by ruud1boy on Apr 16, 2015 20:14:32 GMT 1
Is anyone else confused by this thread? Is Arthur Scargill actually supposed to be coming to the Derby game or have I missed the joke entirely? It's never funny when jokes have to be explained to the uninitiated, but I'm fkin scoobied here.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 17, 2015 7:29:35 GMT 1
Is anyone else confused by this thread? Is Arthur Scargill actually supposed to be coming to the Derby game or have I missed the joke entirely? It's never funny when jokes have to be explained to the uninitiated, but I'm fkin scoobied here. He'll be there. Since when has Arthur let anybody down? By the way, he's had something of a makeover. He'll probably be wearing skinny jeans, snap back cap, Hollister t-shirt and Superdry hoodie. He might be listening to some choons (could be Wilson Pickett). The clue to his real identity will be a very small light attached to the front of his cap. Keep an eye out for him.
|
|
|
Post by 3Pipe on Apr 17, 2015 8:44:52 GMT 1
Wilson Pickett, The Flying Pickets or Average White Band's 'Pickett Up The Pieces'?
|
|
|
Post by Chips Longhorn on Apr 17, 2015 8:49:47 GMT 1
Or anything by Canary Rogers
|
|
|
Post by ruud1boy on Apr 17, 2015 9:14:15 GMT 1
Is anyone else confused by this thread? Is Arthur Scargill actually supposed to be coming to the Derby game or have I missed the joke entirely? It's never funny when jokes have to be explained to the uninitiated, but I'm fkin scoobied here. He'll be there. Since when has Arthur let anybody down? By the way, he's had something of a makeover. He'll probably be wearing skinny jeans, snap back cap, Hollister t-shirt and Superdry hoodie. He might be listening to some choons (could be Wilson Pickett). The clue to his real identity will be a very small light attached to the front of his cap. Keep an eye out for him. Thanks, that's really cleared up the confusion.
|
|
|
Post by lochnessterrier on Apr 17, 2015 10:07:18 GMT 1
Good job there wasn't two otherwise we'd have no fucking industry left! but good job there was one or we'd all be Argentinian I don't recall them trying to invade England. They were just trying to take back what they think is their own.
|
|
|
Post by terrierforeva on Apr 17, 2015 10:47:32 GMT 1
Hope we don't get shafted or it's a bore draw.....
|
|
|
Post by Chips Longhorn on Apr 17, 2015 10:52:36 GMT 1
but good job there was one or we'd all be Argentinian I don't recall them trying to invade England. They were just trying to take back what they think is their own. Cant believe you've forgotten Galtieri's stormtroopers roaming from town to town in their military vehicles
|
|
|
Post by Captainslapper on Apr 17, 2015 16:31:35 GMT 1
but good job there was one or we'd all be Argentinian I don't recall them trying to invade England. They were just trying to take back what they think is their own. You can't take back what you never had.
|
|
|
Post by lochnessterrier on Apr 17, 2015 16:42:43 GMT 1
I don't recall them trying to invade England. They were just trying to take back what they think is their own. You can't take back what you never had. Buenos Aires claimed the islands in 1816, whereas British forces landed in 1833.
|
|
|
Post by Captainslapper on Apr 17, 2015 17:06:35 GMT 1
You can't take back what you never had. Buenos Aires claimed the islands in 1816, whereas British forces landed in 1833. Argentina has never occupied the islands or owned them, so can't take them back. France were the first country to put people on them in 1764 , they then were british, then Spanish and since 1833 british again.
|
|
|
Post by wtd on Apr 17, 2015 18:10:47 GMT 1
Buenos Aires claimed the islands in 1816, whereas British forces landed in 1833. Argentina has never occupied the islands or owned them, so can't take them back. France were the first country to put people on them in 1764 , they then were british, then Spanish and since 1833 british again. So we should give them back to the French, then. (wink)
|
|
|
Post by Captainslapper on Apr 17, 2015 18:22:43 GMT 1
No, we should put the french there and take France!
|
|
|
Post by galpharm2400 on Apr 17, 2015 18:24:23 GMT 1
they invaded because their country was in a shit state and it was to divert attention and give them something to rally around..
they did it because they could, never a good enough reason on its own to do something stupid...
they are in a bit of a shit state again, so who knows??
|
|