|
|
Post by Porrohman on Aug 31, 2015 15:36:02 GMT 1
Well he sure as hell doesn't have the players to play defensive football. Go on Chris try attacking, you might even like it
Sent from my SM-G900F using proboards
|
|
|
|
Post by jimmythebulldog on Aug 31, 2015 15:41:52 GMT 1
Completely wrong and a made up comment to justify a point. When Powell was appointed I didn't get it - he had Charton down the bottom for a reason - crap football. Robins - who wasn't baying for him to leave - if you weren't you should go watch netball. Clueless. Grayson - of course he had to go, if he didn't we were 100% relegated. Clark - liked the guy, liked his football, but he had his chances to get us up and it was time to freshen things up. It worked. So your comment has no foundation Powell is boring, poor football, no ambition. He speaks like a man who is happy to just be in work. If he stays we go down in my opinion.I wouldn't have appointed him in the first place - bonkers decision. And before you ask I would have got rid at the end of the season and got Warburton on a deal before the season ended. So you were/are wanting them all to leave, then ( with a bit of baying thrown in)?   |
|
|
|
Post by tockyterrier on Aug 31, 2015 19:14:11 GMT 1
Hoyle has gone on record as saying that Powell doesn't think he has the players to play attacking football, which is bollocks, if he thinks that he's in the wrong job. We have plenty of players to play attacking football but he's just bot utilising them in a proper attacking formation or style. I personally don't want to see him sacked but he does need to frame himself, a lot of the stuff levelled at him is justified but I guarantee if he is sacked, we will just appointment the same uninspiring and clueless manager as we have done the last 3 times. Hoyle is unable to pick a decent manager at 40 paces, anyone will agree with his 'philosophy' to get the job. Maybe he means he can't play attacking football because he can't rent on the defenders to defend properly, therefore has to sacrifice the attacking side of the game. Just a thought. Sent from my HTC One mini 2 using proboards |
|
|
|
Post by Porrohman on Aug 31, 2015 19:20:06 GMT 1
Hoyle has gone on record as saying that Powell doesn't think he has the players to play attacking football, which is bollocks, if he thinks that he's in the wrong job. We have plenty of players to play attacking football but he's just bot utilising them in a proper attacking formation or style. I personally don't want to see him sacked but he does need to frame himself, a lot of the stuff levelled at him is justified but I guarantee if he is sacked, we will just appointment the same uninspiring and clueless manager as we have done the last 3 times. Hoyle is unable to pick a decent manager at 40 paces, anyone will agree with his 'philosophy' to get the job. Maybe he means he can't play attacking football because he can't rent on the defenders to defend properly, therefore has to sacrifice the attacking side of the game. Just a thought. Sent from my HTC One mini 2 using proboards If that made us solid it would be ok but it doesn't Sent from my SM-G900F using proboards |
|
|
|
Post by waltzingthecowshed on Aug 31, 2015 21:27:56 GMT 1
The thing about all them baying for Powell to leave .. is that the same ones were baying for robins to leave.. and Grayson.. and Clark..and ternant.. and probably would have been dissing Herbert Chapman Conversely the ones wanting him to stay are the ones that wanted Grayson,Robins etc to stay but in the end when it was plainly obvious from result6s on the pitch and league position turned on them and were 'baying for' them to leave...as they will inevitably with Powell....As a person i like Powell he is sincere and has integrity but this is no pre-disposition for him to become a successful manager. |
|
|
|
Post by waltzingthecowshed on Aug 31, 2015 21:38:47 GMT 1
Not many were calling for Clark's sacking although the football had become a bit tedious, the same could be said of Grayson, but in each case Hoyle made the decision at the right time. Powell has to start winning some games pretty damn quick otherwise he'll be going the same way. What I can't understand about him is that when the pressure was off towards the end of last season we started to play some good stuff & created loads of chances. Now, instead of carrying that style & momentum into the new season he's gone back to square one again. He's doing himself no favours with this over cautious approach again.[/b] Exactly  .......he's crafting his own downfall when there is alternatives by playing a more attractive, attacking (no 2 defensive mids please)brand of football that he seems to not believe in and having faith in our creative players like Lolley Dempsey etc |
|
|
|
Post by Frankiesleftpeg on Aug 31, 2015 21:43:24 GMT 1
Hoyle has gone on record as saying that Powell doesn't think he has the players to play attacking football, which is bollocks, if he thinks that he's in the wrong job. We have plenty of players to play attacking football but he's just bot utilising them in a proper attacking formation or style. I personally don't want to see him sacked but he does need to frame himself, a lot of the stuff levelled at him is justified but I guarantee if he is sacked, we will just appointment the same uninspiring and clueless manager as we have done the last 3 times. Hoyle is unable to pick a decent manager at 40 paces, anyone will agree with his 'philosophy' to get the job. , therefore has to sacrifice the attacking side of the game. Just a thought. Sent from my HTC One mini 2 using proboards Most of us on here could see that last season and strengthening the defence should have been his number one priority in the summer, but he's failed to do that and even now there's been no talk of any quality defenders coming in. Let's hope they surprise us all and address the problem tomorrow. |
|
|
|
Post by Chips Longhorn on Aug 31, 2015 21:45:02 GMT 1
The thing about all them baying for Powell to leave .. is that the same ones were baying for robins to leave.. and Grayson.. and Clark..and ternant.. and probably would have been dissing Herbert Chapman Conversely the ones wanting him to stay are the ones that wanted Grayson,Robins etc to stay but in the end when it was plainly obvious from result6s on the pitch and league position turned on them and were 'baying for' them to leave...as they will inevitably with Powell....As a person i like Powell he is sincere and has integrity but this is no pre-disposition for him to become a successful manager. Who are the ones wanting him to stay ? I've certainly not said that .. for the record I wanted shut of Clark .. I was stunned when he sacked Grayson but in hindsight.... I really enjoyed robins till I started to see through it (was pretty late I'll admit ) and Powell I've never been over keen though he's a nice bloke .. hardly any of us are there day to day though .. I don't think sacking manager after manager is the answer.. I don't think.Powell has done too bad a job .. and im happy to trust Hoyle.. infact we have no choice than to trust Hoyle |
|
|
|
Post by waltzingthecowshed on Aug 31, 2015 21:47:26 GMT 1
Hoyle has gone on record as saying that Powell doesn't think he has the players to play attacking football, which is bollocks, if he thinks that he's in the wrong job. We have plenty of players to play attacking football but he's just bot utilising them in a proper attacking formation or style. I personally don't want to see him sacked but he does need to frame himself, a lot of the stuff levelled at him is justified but I guarantee if he is sacked, we will just appointment the same uninspiring and clueless manager as we have done the last 3 times. Hoyle is unable to pick a decent manager at 40 paces, anyone will agree with his 'philosophy' to get the job.[/b] Agree theres some truth here, perhaps we are getting the most important appointment wrong, there still time for CP to change his approach and tactics but got a feeling he wont, hope im wrong and we can progress further with nice guy Powell |
|
|
|
Post by Mr Breitside on Aug 31, 2015 23:05:36 GMT 1
Hoyle has gone on record as saying that Powell doesn't think he has the players to play attacking football, which is bollocks, if he thinks that he's in the wrong job. We have plenty of players to play attacking football but he's just bot utilising them in a proper attacking formation or style. I personally don't want to see him sacked but he does need to frame himself, a lot of the stuff levelled at him is justified but I guarantee if he is sacked, we will just appointment the same uninspiring and clueless manager as we have done the last 3 times. Hoyle is unable to pick a decent manager at 40 paces, anyone will agree with his 'philosophy' to get the job. Powell must think he has the players to play defensive football then...wow. How does he not see the difference in the end of last season and pre-season onwards ? |
|
|
|
Post by Mr Breitside on Aug 31, 2015 23:10:29 GMT 1
Maybe he means he can't play attacking football because he can't rent on the defenders to defend properly, therefore has to sacrifice the attacking side of the game. Just a thought. Sent from my HTC One mini 2 using proboards Most of us on here could see that last season and strengthening the defence should have been his number one priority in the summer, but he's failed to do that and even now there's been no talk of any quality defenders coming in. Let's hope they surprise us all and address the problem tomorrow. Exactly, if we can't attack because the defence isn't good enough why the hell have we not brought in more quality defenders ? We have done the bare minimum by getting a left back, signing a reserve CB and then loaning the other CB out. |
|
.......he's crafting his own downfall when there is alternatives by playing a more attractive, attacking (no 2 defensive mids please)brand of football that he seems to not believe in and having faith in our creative players like Lolley Dempsey etc
