OTIUM

[bluestripe]

Jul 16, 2021 19:58:21 GMT 1 @hukkas said:

Long post alert.

First off...

...But all that said, I still wish him well.

That's a great post.

Free speech Vs making people uncomfortable and unwelcome on a social media platform is a complex area. From a personal perspective, I am fully supportive of any rules to ban homophobic and racist comments on this forum and any social media platform.

Opinions are opinions though, and you should be free to discuss them in a private conversation at home or down the pub with your mates. Otherwise, we are getting close to '1984'.

As a runner, I dislike dog owners. I accept it's a generalisation, and I appreciate there are considerate owners out there. But over the years, I have been bitten a couple of times and tripped a number of times, and on the whole owners do not apologise for failing to keep their dogs under control.

Why is this relevant? Only because, I would be free to abuse dog owners on this and any social media platform without censure. And many dog owners are very sensitive to criticism in my experience, and easily offended.

My question is a philosophical one. Why am I not allowed to abuse someone's sexual orientation or religion, but I am allowed to criticise dog owners or people with ginger hair?

NB. I don't think I should be criticising dog owners or ginger nuts or homosexuals on a football forum, and would be happy for all that to be in the rules.

[Champers]

Jul 17, 2021 12:26:56 GMT 1 @halifaxterrier1 said:

Jul 17, 2021 12:23:26 GMT 1 Champers said:

Okay, given we've already pretty much discussed that he is never going to go back on or allow himself to be educated on his views, and everyone knows he would certainly not apologise for them, and also that he still continued to post inflammatory content despite repeated warnings not to...how would you personally deal with it? Genuine question as I don't see what other option a forum admin would have in those circumstances.

Delete Politics and Off Topic. Wouldnt just solve him, it'd starve the site of about 75% of arguments.

Alot get carried over from that into here.

Without wanting to rubbish the idea straight off the bat, there are many posters who frequent both boards who are able to keep discussion within acceptable social boundaries, whilst still having opinions that may be considered beyond the pale by the majority. Everyone is responsible for their own actions and as a grown adult with (in his own words) a well above average IQ, Otium will have known the writing was on the wall for a long time. He chose to carry on swimming against the tide however, so honestly what other option was there?

[Deleted]

Jul 17, 2021 12:36:38 GMT 1 bluestripe said:

Jul 16, 2021 19:58:21 GMT 1 @hukkas said:

Long post alert.

First off...

...But all that said, I still wish him well.

That's a great post.

Free speech Vs making people uncomfortable and unwelcome on a social media platform is a complex area. From a personal perspective, I am fully supportive of any rules to ban homophobic and racist comments on this forum and any social media platform.

Opinions are opinions though, and you should be free to discuss them in a private conversation at home or down the pub with your mates. Otherwise, we are getting close to '1984'.

As a runner, I dislike dog owners. I accept it's a generalisation, and I appreciate there are considerate owners out there. But over the years, I have been bitten a couple of times and tripped a number of times, and on the whole owners do not apologise for failing to keep their dogs under control.

Why is this relevant? Only because, I would be free to abuse dog owners on this and any social media platform without censure. And many dog owners are very sensitive to criticism in my experience, and easily offended.

My question is a philosophical one. Why am I not allowed to abuse someone's sexual orientation or religion, but I am allowed to criticise dog owners or people with ginger hair?

NB. I don't think I should be criticising dog owners or ginger nuts or homosexuals on a football forum, and would be happy for all that to be in the rules.

That's getting to the point you can't criticise anything. Won't be able to criticise our tactics at this rate on here

[Deleted]

Jul 17, 2021 12:37:42 GMT 1 Champers said:

Jul 17, 2021 12:26:56 GMT 1 @halifaxterrier1 said:

Delete Politics and Off Topic. Wouldnt just solve him, it'd starve the site of about 75% of arguments.

Alot get carried over from that into here.

Without wanting to rubbish the idea straight off the bat, there are many posters who frequent both boards who are able to keep discussion within acceptable social boundaries, whilst still having opinions that may be considered beyond the pale by the majority. Everyone is responsible for their own actions and as a grown adult with (in his own words) a well above average IQ, Otium will have known the writing was on the wall for a long time. He chose to carry on swimming against the tide however, so honestly what other option was there?

It does tend to spill over or a spat that someone has had gets carried over, not just with Oti. Why mix the two on a football forum, they simply don't go at all

[ritchie]

Jul 17, 2021 12:16:56 GMT 1 kennyk2 said:

Jul 17, 2021 12:05:45 GMT 1 ritchie said:

there was a lad not too long back who opened up on here about being gay/following town

thats fucking backbone. because not many have

... and that's the problem. You shouldn't need to have to worry about revealing that to people.

exactly

[Chips Longhorn]

Jul 17, 2021 12:40:04 GMT 1 @halifaxterrier1 said:

Jul 17, 2021 12:37:42 GMT 1 Champers said:

Without wanting to rubbish the idea straight off the bat, there are many posters who frequent both boards who are able to keep discussion within acceptable social boundaries, whilst still having opinions that may be considered beyond the pale by the majority. Everyone is responsible for their own actions and as a grown adult with (in his own words) a well above average IQ, Otium will have known the writing was on the wall for a long time. He chose to carry on swimming against the tide however, so honestly what other option was there?

It does tend to spill over or a spat that someone has had gets carried over, not just with Oti. Why mix the two on a football forum, they simply don't go at all

Up to press you've been here barely 2 months. 103 posts. TWENTY SEVEN about otium ? Really ?

Also don't you think maybe you should get your feet under the table before telling us to delete whole boards off this site? If you don't like it stick with talk of the town . Simple

[galpharm2400]

Jul 17, 2021 12:36:38 GMT 1 bluestripe said:

Jul 16, 2021 19:58:21 GMT 1 @hukkas said:

Long post alert.

First off...

...But all that said, I still wish him well.

That's a great post.

Free speech Vs making people uncomfortable and unwelcome on a social media platform is a complex area. From a personal perspective, I am fully supportive of any rules to ban homophobic and racist comments on this forum and any social media platform.

Opinions are opinions though, and you should be free to discuss them in a private conversation at home or down the pub with your mates. Otherwise, we are getting close to '1984'.

As a runner, I dislike dog owners. I accept it's a generalisation, and I appreciate there are considerate owners out there. But over the years, I have been bitten a couple of times and tripped a number of times, and on the whole owners do not apologise for failing to keep their dogs under control.

Why is this relevant? Only because, I would be free to abuse dog owners on this and any social media platform without censure. And many dog owners are very sensitive to criticism in my experience, and easily offended.

My question is a philosophical one. Why am I not allowed to abuse someone's sexual orientation or religion, but I am allowed to criticise dog owners or people with ginger hair?

NB. I don't think I should be criticising dog owners or ginger nuts or homosexuals on a football forum, and would be happy for all that to be in the rules.

The rub is the interpretation of comments regarding sexual preference, religion or race.
The use of a fact can upset some. If we cannot use a fact in a debate because someone may be upset or deny its relevance to the matter, there is no point in the debate.

Denying debate or question is easier than making the argument it seems and has become the weapon of choice for many here.

When those people are, in the future, denied their freedom to debate or question it probably wont even register with them that they enabled this to become allowed. It will be those now cancelling them at fault.

In the land of free speech for those who say what you like and deny the facts you dont like, most of us will become the wrong sort of person with the wrong opinions eventually.?

[Champers]

Jul 17, 2021 12:36:38 GMT 1 bluestripe said:

Jul 16, 2021 19:58:21 GMT 1 @hukkas said:

Long post alert.

First off...

...But all that said, I still wish him well.

That's a great post.

Free speech Vs making people uncomfortable and unwelcome on a social media platform is a complex area. From a personal perspective, I am fully supportive of any rules to ban homophobic and racist comments on this forum and any social media platform.

Opinions are opinions though, and you should be free to discuss them in a private conversation at home or down the pub with your mates. Otherwise, we are getting close to '1984'.

As a runner, I dislike dog owners. I accept it's a generalisation, and I appreciate there are considerate owners out there. But over the years, I have been bitten a couple of times and tripped a number of times, and on the whole owners do not apologise for failing to keep their dogs under control.

Why is this relevant? Only because, I would be free to abuse dog owners on this and any social media platform without censure. And many dog owners are very sensitive to criticism in my experience, and easily offended.

My question is a philosophical one. Why am I not allowed to abuse someone's sexual orientation or religion, but I am allowed to criticise dog owners or people with ginger hair?

NB. I don't think I should be criticising dog owners or ginger nuts or homosexuals on a football forum, and would be happy for all that to be in the rules.

The brief answer to your question is that dog owners haven't had to put up with being oppressed by society for decades or more because of being born a certain way. They haven't had to run daily gauntlets of abuse, haven't had to cover up who they really are for fear of violent reprisals etc, etc.

Abusing someone for the colour of their hair shouldn't be condoned at all, but I can't think of any examples where ginger people have been shunned by the whole of society or treat as second class citizens (or worse) because of their hair colour.

[ritchie]

Jul 17, 2021 10:50:42 GMT 1 digs said:

Will this forum only be truly happy when everyone agrees on everything and all the characters are banned? i used to look at Datm everyday and post,nowadays I forget it's here,,which fucking numb nuts complain to admin over words on a football forum,obviously we dont want threatening behaviour and down right racism homophobia ect,but I thought people were allowed an opinion. So why don't the offended fuck off and start a forum for people that don't like to be offended?

didnt you lot 'fuck off' and start your own?

characters, opinions are all great and weve lost a lot. but writing stuff that might deeply affect a young town fan is not something i want to see on here from anyone, character or not.

to say being gay is 'a lifestyle choice' is down right homophobia

[Chips Longhorn]

Jul 17, 2021 12:45:40 GMT 1 Chips Longhorn said:

Jul 17, 2021 12:40:04 GMT 1 @halifaxterrier1 said:

It does tend to spill over or a spat that someone has had gets carried over, not just with Oti. Why mix the two on a football forum, they simply don't go at all

Up to press you've been here barely 2 months. 103 posts. TWENTY SEVEN about otium ? Really ?

Also don't you think maybe you should get your feet under the table before telling us to delete whole boards off this site? If you don't like it stick with talk of the town . Simple

Sorry .. I got it wrong... its 30 fucking 7 posts about otium in 36 hours .. over a third of all your lifetime posts. Blimey that's some obsession

[Deleted]

Jul 17, 2021 12:45:40 GMT 1 Chips Longhorn said:

Jul 17, 2021 12:40:04 GMT 1 @halifaxterrier1 said:

It does tend to spill over or a spat that someone has had gets carried over, not just with Oti. Why mix the two on a football forum, they simply don't go at all

Up to press you've been here barely 2 months. 103 posts. TWENTY SEVEN about otium ? Really ?

Also don't you think maybe you should get your feet under the table before telling us to delete whole boards off this site? If you don't like it stick with talk of the town . Simple

Sorry didn't realise I had to have 20,000 posts to be part of the gang on here.

You're part of the problem on here with that stance. I can't have a view to what I think would be a good idea cos I've not posted alot. Whopper

[Terrier Ramone]

I want to wish Oti all the very best, by far the most entertaining poster on here, I've never met him & disagree with most of his views but there's plenty of people on here I disagree with but just ignore. Love him or loathe him, he is a character.

All the very best

[Deleted]

Jul 17, 2021 12:57:12 GMT 1 Chips Longhorn said:

Jul 17, 2021 12:45:40 GMT 1 Chips Longhorn said:

Up to press you've been here barely 2 months. 103 posts. TWENTY SEVEN about otium ? Really ?

Also don't you think maybe you should get your feet under the table before telling us to delete whole boards off this site? If you don't like it stick with talk of the town . Simple

Sorry .. I got it wrong... its 30 fucking 7 posts about otium in 36 hours .. over a third of all your lifetime posts. Blimey that's some obsession

Ted I had an account before, same name. Deleted it due to dicksplashes like you on here. Thought I'd give another go, seems ya still splashing

[yoy]

Jul 17, 2021 12:36:38 GMT 1 bluestripe said:

Jul 16, 2021 19:58:21 GMT 1 @hukkas said:

Long post alert.

First off...

...But all that said, I still wish him well.

That's a great post.

Free speech Vs making people uncomfortable and unwelcome on a social media platform is a complex area. From a personal perspective, I am fully supportive of any rules to ban homophobic and racist comments on this forum and any social media platform.

Opinions are opinions though, and you should be free to discuss them in a private conversation at home or down the pub with your mates. Otherwise, we are getting close to '1984'.

As a runner, I dislike dog owners. I accept it's a generalisation, and I appreciate there are considerate owners out there. But over the years, I have been bitten a couple of times and tripped a number of times, and on the whole owners do not apologise for failing to keep their dogs under control.

Why is this relevant? Only because, I would be free to abuse dog owners on this and any social media platform without censure. And many dog owners are very sensitive to criticism in my experience, and easily offended.

My question is a philosophical one. Why am I not allowed to abuse someone's sexual orientation or religion, but I am allowed to criticise dog owners or people with ginger hair?

NB. I don't think I should be criticising dog owners or ginger nuts or homosexuals on a football forum, and would be happy for all that to be in the rules.

There are undoubtedly protected minorities of which dog owners are not one. Generally I would say that the greatest protections should come for the minorities who have faced the most historic persecution and who live with the cost of discrimination day in day out.

[bluestripe]

Jul 17, 2021 12:38:58 GMT 1 @halifaxterrier1 said:

Jul 17, 2021 12:36:38 GMT 1 bluestripe said:

That's a great post.

Free speech Vs making people uncomfortable and unwelcome on a social media platform is a complex area. From a personal perspective, I am fully supportive of any rules to ban homophobic and racist comments on this forum and any social media platform.

Opinions are opinions though, and you should be free to discuss them in a private conversation at home or down the pub with your mates. Otherwise, we are getting close to '1984'.

As a runner, I dislike dog owners. I accept it's a generalisation, and I appreciate there are considerate owners out there. But over the years, I have been bitten a couple of times and tripped a number of times, and on the whole owners do not apologise for failing to keep their dogs under control.

Why is this relevant? Only because, I would be free to abuse dog owners on this and any social media platform without censure. And many dog owners are very sensitive to criticism in my experience, and easily offended.

My question is a philosophical one. Why am I not allowed to abuse someone's sexual orientation or religion, but I am allowed to criticise dog owners or people with ginger hair?

NB. I don't think I should be criticising dog owners or ginger nuts or homosexuals on a football forum, and would be happy for all that to be in the rules.

That's getting to the point you can't criticise anything. Won't be able to criticise our tactics at this rate on here

Carlos has feelings too 🤪

[bluestripe]

Jul 17, 2021 12:51:08 GMT 1 Champers said:

Jul 17, 2021 12:36:38 GMT 1 bluestripe said:

That's a great post.

Free speech Vs making people uncomfortable and unwelcome on a social media platform is a complex area. From a personal perspective, I am fully supportive of any rules to ban homophobic and racist comments on this forum and any social media platform.

Opinions are opinions though, and you should be free to discuss them in a private conversation at home or down the pub with your mates. Otherwise, we are getting close to '1984'.

As a runner, I dislike dog owners. I accept it's a generalisation, and I appreciate there are considerate owners out there. But over the years, I have been bitten a couple of times and tripped a number of times, and on the whole owners do not apologise for failing to keep their dogs under control.

Why is this relevant? Only because, I would be free to abuse dog owners on this and any social media platform without censure. And many dog owners are very sensitive to criticism in my experience, and easily offended.

My question is a philosophical one. Why am I not allowed to abuse someone's sexual orientation or religion, but I am allowed to criticise dog owners or people with ginger hair?

NB. I don't think I should be criticising dog owners or ginger nuts or homosexuals on a football forum, and would be happy for all that to be in the rules.

The brief answer to your question is that dog owners haven't had to put up with being oppressed by society for decades or more because of being born a certain way. They haven't had to run daily gauntlets of abuse, haven't had to cover up who they really are for fear of violent reprisals etc, etc.

Need to be more robust in my response then next time I get bitten or tripped. 🤪

[Deleted]

Jul 17, 2021 12:45:40 GMT 1 Chips Longhorn said:

Jul 17, 2021 12:40:04 GMT 1 @halifaxterrier1 said:

It does tend to spill over or a spat that someone has had gets carried over, not just with Oti. Why mix the two on a football forum, they simply don't go at all

Up to press you've been here barely 2 months. 103 posts. TWENTY SEVEN about otium ? Really ?

Also don't you think maybe you should get your feet under the table before telling us to delete whole boards off this site? If you don't like it stick with talk of the town . Simple

You don't like Oti, you've come after me as I've interacted properly for the last 24 hours and it so happens to me giving my point across on a thread of someone you're not fond of.

I was asked what would I do and I said remove the Politics thread. As I've not been on here long, my input apparently doesn't count. I'm not a steady veteran like yourself.

I have no fascination with Oti, I responded because a life ban for anyone is draconian, so I discussed that.

You've got clever and tried to take the piss out of me claiming I'm obsessed. You're a complete fucking knob head if I'm honest.

[shedds]

i dont frequent the politics board so not involved in any spats that go on there ,but i wouldnt want to lose the off topic thread ,as thats the place i mostly go to and the film and tv and music threads are what i contribute to and have helped me during everything thats gone on last couple of years

[digs]

Jul 17, 2021 12:52:47 GMT 1 ritchie said:

Jul 17, 2021 10:50:42 GMT 1 digs said:

Will this forum only be truly happy when everyone agrees on everything and all the characters are banned? i used to look at Datm everyday and post,nowadays I forget it's here,,which fucking numb nuts complain to admin over words on a football forum,obviously we dont want threatening behaviour and down right racism homophobia ect,but I thought people were allowed an opinion. So why don't the offended fuck off and start a forum for people that don't like to be offended?

didnt you lot 'fuck off' and start your own?

characters, opinions are all great and weve lost a lot. but writing stuff that might deeply affect a young town fan is not something i want to see on here from anyone, character or not.

to say being gay is 'a lifestyle choice' is down right homophobia

We fucked off about 10 years ago due to the admin at the time deleting our entire sub board,and coming out with the excuse that it was an accident by an imaginary admin called Terry,even today's admin aren't that stupid,

[Deleted]

Jul 17, 2021 11:56:54 GMT 1 Captainslapper said:

Jul 17, 2021 11:36:15 GMT 1 Champers said:

The thing is, Captain, not one of them have ever promoted that viewpoint either to me directly or via any of their social media platforms. How many muslims do you know personally that OPENLY promote those views? Can you possibly provide me with any evidence of one person that you actually know who does? If you can then there may be a discussion to be had about it. If not, then I have to wonder why you keep drifting down this particular road?

So on one hand you have one individual bloke on an obscure forum who 'might' have his opinions viewed by a gay person.
On the other you have a religion (s) that you know actively promotes that viewpoint to millions of people and you know suppresses the sexuality of hundreds of thousands of gay people.

We'll silence the individual,, but the mass promotion of this sexual intolerance can be ignored because they only promote it in their own religious group?
You know many muslims.. why dont you ask them if their views tally with otiums?

Your argument is like living next door to a family who have swastikas in their windows and you hear the sound of recordings of hitlers speeches drifting over the garden fence,, but you arent going to be concerned that they're nazis because they haven't mentioned it to you.

I drift down this road because its an outrageous anomaly in what is happening here.
If we're banning the views of an individual, then lets ban religion too, as in terms of scale and effect, the two are not even on the same stratosphere.

A quick reminder to you about what the Bible says: "If a man lies with a male as with a woman, both of them have committed an abomination; they shall surely be put to death; their blood is upon them." (Leviticus 20). So it's not just an issue with Islam. Just as there are Christians who reject that, there are Muslims against homophobia. Here's a facebook site you might like to follow: www.facebook.com/MuslimsAgainstLGBTHate/

[ritchie]

Jul 17, 2021 13:15:03 GMT 1 digs said:

Jul 17, 2021 12:52:47 GMT 1 ritchie said:

didnt you lot 'fuck off' and start your own?

characters, opinions are all great and weve lost a lot. but writing stuff that might deeply affect a young town fan is not something i want to see on here from anyone, character or not.

to say being gay is 'a lifestyle choice' is down right homophobia

We fucked off about 10 years ago due to the admin at the time deleting our entire sub board,and coming out with the excuse that it was an accident by an imaginary admin called Terry,even today's admin aren't that stupid,

You fucked off because you got offended, then

edit: you're actually one of my favourite posters, and always lighthearted..so i dont want to get into an argument. But think you are letting yourself down with that by not looking at it objectively. what he wrote was down right homophobia, so call it what it is

[Chips Longhorn]

Jul 17, 2021 13:08:46 GMT 1 @halifaxterrier1 said:

Jul 17, 2021 12:45:40 GMT 1 Chips Longhorn said:

Up to press you've been here barely 2 months. 103 posts. TWENTY SEVEN about otium ? Really ?

Also don't you think maybe you should get your feet under the table before telling us to delete whole boards off this site? If you don't like it stick with talk of the town . Simple

You don't like Oti, you've come after me as I've interacted properly for the last 24 hours and it so happens to me giving my point across on a thread of someone you're not fond of.

I was asked what would I do and I said remove the Politics thread. As I've not been on here long, my input apparently doesn't count. I'm not a steady veteran like yourself.

I have no fascination with Oti, I responded because a life ban for anyone is draconian, so I discussed that.

You've got clever and tried to take the piss out of me claiming I'm obsessed. You're a complete fucking knob head if I'm honest.

I do like otium.. and that's over 40 now .. oh and dicksplash is personal abuse. As is complete fucking knobheqd. Keep going ill report you . Maybe go out enjoy the sunshine and stop.obsessing about your hero

[Champers]

Jul 17, 2021 13:05:17 GMT 1 bluestripe said:

Jul 17, 2021 12:51:08 GMT 1 Champers said:

The brief answer to your question is that dog owners haven't had to put up with being oppressed by society for decades or more because of being born a certain way. They haven't had to run daily gauntlets of abuse, haven't had to cover up who they really are for fear of violent reprisals etc, etc.

Need to be more robust in my response then next time I get bitten or tripped. 🤪

I personally cannot stand dogs, but I probably do them a disservice as they largely just exhibit behaviour that their doofus owner has taught them is okay. I've blown out so many jobs because people think it's okay for their rottweiler to sniff my bollocks whilst I pull cables from one room to another, despite being told to lock them away prior to my arrival. "You wouldn't lock your Nanna away, why should I do the same to Bessy?"...."well mate, my nanna might not be perfect, but she sure isn't gonna lick your face after eating a load of her own shit and vomit for starters" 😒

[Deleted]

Jul 17, 2021 13:23:36 GMT 1 Chips Longhorn said:

Jul 17, 2021 13:08:46 GMT 1 @halifaxterrier1 said:

You don't like Oti, you've come after me as I've interacted properly for the last 24 hours and it so happens to me giving my point across on a thread of someone you're not fond of.

I was asked what would I do and I said remove the Politics thread. As I've not been on here long, my input apparently doesn't count. I'm not a steady veteran like yourself.

I have no fascination with Oti, I responded because a life ban for anyone is draconian, so I discussed that.

You've got clever and tried to take the piss out of me claiming I'm obsessed. You're a complete fucking knob head if I'm honest.

I do like otium.. and that's over 40 now .. oh and dicksplash is personal abuse. Maybe go out enjoy the sunshine and stop.obsessing about your hero

Over 40 on a thread about him, not directly for him.

Are you usually this way or do you inherit being a fucking knob after a few thousand posts?

Funny you thinking because you've been here longer, your say is better than those that are quite new.

That makes you a knobhead and a reason people are put off joining this site. You wanna wind it in really, you're a grown man on a high horse in a fucking forum.

[El Mel]

Imagine if some of us cracked gags at the expense of our Muslim neighbours on here.

[Chips Longhorn]

Jul 17, 2021 13:26:58 GMT 1 @halifaxterrier1 said:

Jul 17, 2021 13:23:36 GMT 1 Chips Longhorn said:

I do like otium.. and that's over 40 now .. oh and dicksplash is personal abuse. Maybe go out enjoy the sunshine and stop.obsessing about your hero

Over 40 on a thread about him, not directly for him.

Are you usually this way or do you inherit being a fucking knob after a few thousand posts?

Funny you thinking because you've been here longer, your say is better than those that are quite new.

That makes you a knobhead and a reason people are put off joining this site. You wanna wind it in really, you're a grown man on a high horse in a fucking forum.

Well you can't say I didn't give you prior notice

[Deleted]

Jul 17, 2021 13:30:09 GMT 1 El Mel said:

Imagine if some of us cracked gags at the expense of our Muslim neighbours on here.

Absolute gold

Admin a site and write in rules on this, yet on YouTube taking the piss.

Only on Datm 😂😂😂😂😂

[specialun]

I take notice of his football posts - not because I always agree with them - but he has his own style, stimulates debate

I don’t know enough about the background to what he has / has not said historically

I’ve seen the homophobic comments copied on here which he’s supposedly said - If he has said those on this forum then they’re indefensible

[Mecha Corte]

Jul 17, 2021 12:45:40 GMT 1 Chips Longhorn said:

Jul 17, 2021 12:40:04 GMT 1 @halifaxterrier1 said:

It does tend to spill over or a spat that someone has had gets carried over, not just with Oti. Why mix the two on a football forum, they simply don't go at all

Up to press you've been here barely 2 months. 103 posts. TWENTY SEVEN about otium ? Really ?

Also don't you think maybe you should get your feet under the table before telling us to delete whole boards off this site? If you don't like it stick with talk of the town . Simple

Last year I happened to mention you had nearly 50,000 posts and you threw a pissy fit at me, what’s it got to do with you,blah, blag blah. So why is it acceptable for you to not only go through his posting history but dissect who is mentioned ? Play by your own rules.

[Deleted]

Jul 17, 2021 13:31:23 GMT 1 Chips Longhorn said:

Jul 17, 2021 13:26:58 GMT 1 @halifaxterrier1 said:

Over 40 on a thread about him, not directly for him.

Are you usually this way or do you inherit being a fucking knob after a few thousand posts?

Funny you thinking because you've been here longer, your say is better than those that are quite new.

That makes you a knobhead and a reason people are put off joining this site. You wanna wind it in really, you're a grown man on a high horse in a fucking forum.

Well you can't say I didn't give you prior notice

Reported me I guess.

After being called a knobhead, which you are. After antagonising me for no reason, which could be seen as victimising if this sites anything to go by.

Previous to this, I've had zero interaction at all with you, you've just started to provoke.

Makes you a knob and if you can't see that or admins can't see that, God help them.

If I get a warning for calling someone trying to troll or victimise me, who I've never spoke to or said a word to, there's something very wrong