Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 17, 2014 23:04:50 GMT 1
I'm talking about proper traditions, 'Tigers' sounds dumb, it smacks of Americanisation. I agree, I really do, but I just don't think we have much of a say at the end of the day  I'm not so sure, reading that article it appears the fans had a large say in the FA decision. |
|
|
|
Post by jimmythebulldog on Mar 18, 2014 0:20:53 GMT 1
I'm talking about proper traditions, 'Tigers' sounds dumb, it smacks of Americanisation. Oi not having that at all!!! Not every team over here has a stupid name. New York Knickerbockers and Utah Jazz are quality. Huddersfield Jazz Off Knicks - sell tons of shirts. |
|
|
|
Post by buzz on Mar 18, 2014 0:52:19 GMT 1
We are proper tin pot compared with them at the moment! We would do well copy em! Not slag em off!!
|
|
|
|
Post by LordyOfTheManor on Mar 18, 2014 1:03:32 GMT 1
Full credit imo to Hull City supporters for their stance regarding this, especially during what is their most successful period in their entire history.
Compare this to the Cardiff fans whom basically rolled over and died, selling their soul to the devil in the process, just to accomplish a bit of instant success.
|
|
|
|
Post by Essex Terrier on Mar 18, 2014 10:02:48 GMT 1
I agree, I really do, but I just don't think we have much of a say at the end of the day I'm not so sure, reading that article it appears the fans had a large say in the FA decision. But there's that saying about the difference between winning battles and winning wars? |
|
terrier5
Tom Cowan Terrier
[M0:5]
Posts: 705
|
Post by terrier5 on Mar 18, 2014 11:01:08 GMT 1
They are Hull City, plain and simple. Isn't changing the name just trying to put a sugar coating on things? Don't you start  Very a-muesli-ng |
|
