wonder how long dickinson will stay?

[terrier1000]

wouldn't suprise me if we don't see dickinson play for town again, bet he gets recalled by derby before end of week

[CaptainHart]

As he's only eligible for one game it would seem pointless to keep him.

[Deleted]

Given our options for the L***s game without him I hope he does stay.

[Terrier9]

Nov 4, 2008 11:12:10 GMT 1 @digger said:

Given our options for the L***s game without him I hope he does stay.

We will need him for Leeds, like him or not he does score

[Grandfather Berty of Cleck]

Nov 4, 2008 11:10:07 GMT 1 CaptainHart said:

As he's only eligible for one game it would seem pointless to keep him.

With who that one game is against,
it's vital we DO keep him.

[Deleted]

He has been awful recently, doesnt look like he cares. Not sure if thats because he didnt want to play for Stan or just the club. I guess it will be one of Aidy's first big decisions

[Deleted]

What would be the point in sending him back 1 game early?

[Deleted]

Nov 4, 2008 13:37:14 GMT 1 @rjs said:

What would be the point in sending him back 1 game early?

What would be the point in a new manager having a player in his squad who will only be there for one more game? He may aswell work with what he knows he is going to have for the foreseable future.

[Deleted]

Nov 4, 2008 13:41:36 GMT 1 Galpharmer said:

Nov 4, 2008 13:37:14 GMT 1 @rjs said:

What would be the point in sending him back 1 game early?

What would be the point in a new manager having a player in his squad who will only be there for one more game? He may aswell work with what he knows he is going to have for the foreseable future.

Didn't really think of it from that side (new manager rather than Caretaker), I'd still imagine that for that 1 game they will keep him here considering Boothy's absence.

[Yorkie]

So let's send him back just because he only has 1 game left, 1 game where he could score the winning goal and set the new manager up nicely. I'd rather have him for 1 more game than none at all. The leeds game is going to be a massive baptism of fire for the new manager and if I was him i'd prefer to worry about my strikeforce after the leeds game.

[Deleted]

Nov 4, 2008 13:48:00 GMT 1 Yorkie said:

So let's send him back just because he only has 1 game left, 1 game where he could score the winning goal and set the new manager up nicely. I'd rather have him for 1 more game than none at all. The leeds game is going to be a massive baptism of fire for the new manager and if I was him i'd prefer to worry about my strikeforce after the leeds game.

Well if i was manager, i would want to start building my side the moment i walked through the door and i wouldnt want to start building my side around a loan player who leaves after one game. Add to that he is a loan player who isnt really all that good.

[Yorkie]

I'm not saying build a side round him but he's scored more than beckett parker cads jevons broadbent combined. And he's got more 1st team games under his belt.

[Deleted]

Nov 4, 2008 13:53:07 GMT 1 Yorkie said:

I'm not saying build a side round him but he's scored more than beckett parker cads jevons broadbent combined. And he's got more 1st team games under his belt.

So he should have, those lot have hardly played upfront

[Deleted]

He has scored goals for us, for the sake of his last game of his loan spell, we should keep him.

[Mastercracker]

Judging by his little altercation with Turnip on sat I think he will be pleased he's gone.