|
|
Post by Tez on Dec 26, 2008 22:21:07 GMT 1
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 26, 2008 23:15:47 GMT 1
I reckon he may even consider Lucketti again soon. |
|
|
|
Post by kleverboy on Dec 26, 2008 23:38:44 GMT 1
Just had a listen. What a top bloke!  |
|
|
|
Post by orbitalhtafc on Dec 27, 2008 1:49:30 GMT 1
aye have to agree hope every 1 who goes on Sunday Backs the team and management. Lee Clark seems like a top lad, realy hope he does well.
|
|
|
|
Post by pling on Dec 27, 2008 4:15:16 GMT 1
Top bloke......
I'm all for being positive, but he didn't make any changes before we were 2-0 down, that's back to the same old reactive, not proactive management we are used to, but sick and tired of.
|
|
|
|
Post by pozza on Dec 27, 2008 4:45:49 GMT 1
Top bloke...... I'm all for being positive, but he didn't make any changes before we were 2-0 down, that's back to the same old reactive, not proactive management we are used to, but sick and tired of. To be fair both players were stripped and waiting to come on seconds before they got the second goal. If that shot had have gne wide I think you'd hve seen the same substitution made. |
|
|
|
Post by kleverboy on Dec 27, 2008 8:25:41 GMT 1
Top bloke...... I'm all for being positive, but he didn't make any changes before we were 2-0 down, that's back to the same old reactive, not proactive management we are used to, but sick and tired of. Have you actually listened to the interview, pling? He clearly states he was trying to make those substitutions BEFORE the second goal went in. His second game in charge, not his second season... don't you feel you're being a tad hasty in your judgment? |
|
|
|
Post by Tez on Dec 27, 2008 10:49:35 GMT 1
Have you actually listened to the interview, pling? He clearly states he was trying to make those substitutions BEFORE the second goal went in. Ta KleverBoy! That was the point of this thread, for folk to LISTEN to what Clarky had to say.   UTT. |
|
|
|
Post by mickydombat on Dec 27, 2008 11:29:57 GMT 1
I can't for the life of me believe that Clark played the same team and formation that was so woeful and lucky against Hereford. It is obvious to me that Collins and Goodwin and a back 5 neede to be changed with the more positive 442 and Beresford and Worthy in midfield and Cads and Jevo up front. Why did we have to lose this match to make the change for Scunny game? Must say Clark probably didn't want to tinker but a manager needs to change what he sees and his selection and our loss is his first massive mistake, lets hope he learns from this very fast. Also it was clear Smithies was wobbling and Glennon needs to be back for Sunday.
Oh, and Goodwin must be dropped and Collins they are so pansified they can't handle aggression, and around Xmas we need bite and terrier like fortitude!
Scunny will be difficult game, can Clark pick the right team?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 27, 2008 11:52:29 GMT 1
Stick with Berrett as sweeper in a 3-5-2. Haven't done badly playing that way since GM went with it (Can Clarke and Butler be trusted in a back 4 without the cover of Berrett?)
Worthy in for Collins.
Done.
|
|
|
|
Post by Tez on Dec 27, 2008 12:10:33 GMT 1
442 for me. As long as Williams is in the side in the LB role he leaves us too exposed as a side back in a 352.
|
|
