Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 27, 2008 18:44:17 GMT 1
Well why do you think? I don't want to start the debate up again. We both know exactly how it's going to go and neither of us are going to change our minds. He`s a goalscorer & thats all i`m looking at. He didn`t fiddle with kids or owt like that & he`s done his time. Don`t get me wrong i don`t condone what he did but everyones entitled to a second chance.
|
|
|
Post by hughphamism on Dec 27, 2008 19:01:30 GMT 1
According to wikipedia Danny Graham is out of contract in the summer - he'd be a more likely & better option for us & cheaper as well. Plus he's more likely to sign for us than lee Hughes.
|
|
|
Post by jasond on Dec 27, 2008 19:17:57 GMT 1
Forget the ethics £400K in this climate . You could buy Oldham for that. I agree that is at least four times his transfer value. At this level for 400k you could get a lot younger and better striker than him imo.
|
|
|
Post by timrankhan on Dec 27, 2008 19:36:42 GMT 1
surely if we are going to pay 400k we might as well get what we need ie someone big and powerful...or spend the money on wages ie kuqi
|
|
|
Post by thomo on Dec 27, 2008 19:39:01 GMT 1
According to wikipedia Danny Graham is out of contract in the summer - he'd be a more likely & better option for us & cheaper as well. Plus he's more likely to sign for us than lee Hughes. Graham is a good call
|
|
|
Post by TerrierArmy on Dec 28, 2008 0:21:31 GMT 1
Jamie Ward is our man .
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 28, 2008 1:16:44 GMT 1
I'll second that.
|
|
|
Post by Walton-on-the-Hill Terrier on Dec 28, 2008 19:54:41 GMT 1
Jamie Ward's a good striker, but he makes Parker look tall!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 28, 2008 19:56:45 GMT 1
If we could get ward and a target man/boothy back to full fitness and flog parker or jevons we would be laughing
|
|
chriseastwood
Iain Dunn Terrier
Ooh to be a, Ooh to be a TERRIER!!
Posts: 539
|
Post by chriseastwood on Dec 28, 2008 23:04:05 GMT 1
In the Lee Clark column in today's programme he says:- "I am still hoping to add one more staff member to my backroom team, which will probably happen in the New Year. That person will have a role to play IN THE FIRST-TEAM, with their primary task being to bridge the gap between the first team and the Academy. If I can get the man I am after I will be absolutely delighted and I believe it will complete what is probably among the best backroom teams in the country."
Interesting how Clark says "in the first team" and not "with the first team".
Could the new member of the backroom staff also be playing in the first team? Could it be Phillips?
|
|