Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 12, 2009 20:16:30 GMT 1
Its not even funny how closely you can relate with that article given what he has done here. Hopefully a mention of that will be in the newspaper article mids referred to
|
|
|
Post by mids on Jan 12, 2009 21:54:43 GMT 1
The relevant journalist has been given lots of information to help his investigation (all backed up by internet links so that it can't be dismissed as 'opinion' or 'myopic bigotry') He'll do his own groundwork of course but the info will help him get his head around things in advance. I'll let you know when things are about to go public
|
|
|
Post by BradfordTerrier on Jan 12, 2009 21:59:52 GMT 1
the sooner the better. think we may lose a few posters on here when it does, cant see too many of the pro davy brigade being too humble. whats the bets some still throw the, 'he saved us' line regardless of any new info.
|
|
|
Post by ctt on Jan 12, 2009 22:27:12 GMT 1
There's already an article that tells everyone what happened, written by some hotshot journalist :-) back at the end of 2006. As far as I'm aware, no legal action was taken as a result, so it must be copper-bottomed.
|
|
|
Post by Porrohman on Jan 12, 2009 22:53:14 GMT 1
god i cant wait for the expose in the press,cos we know he only stepped in to save the stadium even though fartown would struggle to fill lockwood park
|
|
|
Post by mids on Jan 13, 2009 0:13:04 GMT 1
There's already an article that tells everyone what happened, written by some hotshot journalist :-) back at the end of 2006. As far as I'm aware, no legal action was taken as a result, so it must be copper-bottomed. Excellent, so there was he can't have disagreed with the facts then
|
|
|
Post by shawsie on Jan 13, 2009 0:27:20 GMT 1
the sooner the better. think we may lose a few posters on here when it does, cant see too many of the pro davy brigade being too humble. whats the bets some still throw the, 'he saved us' line regardless of any new info. Think you are being a bit harsh here stants - some of us have always said we are and will remain grateful to KD for pulling us out of the deep brown stuff. What has gone on since Administration is however indefensible - the man has simply not been open and honest with the public and the recent Yorkshire Sport article was an insult! I just hope that whatever does come out paints a full picture which allows us all to fully understand the situation!!!!!!!!!
|
|
|
Post by mids on Jan 13, 2009 9:03:34 GMT 1
Think you are being a bit harsh here stants - some of us have always said we are and will remain grateful to KD for pulling us out of the deep brown stuff. I just hope that whatever does come out paints a full picture which allows us all to fully understand the situation!!!!!!!!! Grateful for pulling us out of the brown stuff.......milking the situation for all it's worth personally to him.....tieing everything up in knots.....removing the football club's assetts.....and then walking away whilst we're still 'potentially' in the brown stuff for years to come due to his dealings......what a saviour!!!! Of course a full picture will be painted, or else he wouldn't be doing his job properly
|
|
|
Post by townatheart on Jan 13, 2009 9:56:53 GMT 1
the sooner the better. think we may lose a few posters on here when it does, cant see too many of the pro davy brigade being too humble. whats the bets some still throw the, 'he saved us' line regardless of any new info. I dont think that there will be very many of those left. Always a few, who in spite of all the information that has eventually come out, will cling on to their original opinions.
|
|
|
Post by richhtfc on Jan 13, 2009 11:01:39 GMT 1
If this article really unearths some underhand dealings which are to the detriment of our club rather than just the typically selfish acts of a businessman then i'll hold my hands up and say that you were all right and I was wrong. No problem with that at all.
|
|
Davey Monroe
David Wagner Terrier
[M0:0][N4:#@David_Major#]
Posts: 2,863
|
Post by Davey Monroe on Jan 13, 2009 11:20:48 GMT 1
The trouble is many Town fans only read the Examiner who are so far up Davy's backside they can see the back of his teeth! I doubt they'd print a similar article.
|
|
|
Post by dugnet on Jan 13, 2009 11:30:15 GMT 1
The trouble is many Town fans only read the Examiner who are so far up Davy's backside they can see the back of his teeth! I doubt they'd print a similar article. I am not so sure that the majority of Town fans view KD with rose tinted spectacles. It is fantastic that we Dean Hoyle in charge now and I am sure that contentious issue of the stadium ownership will be raised in years to come. There are many on here who view KD with a degree of suspicion and in my opinion with good reason. I am a great believer in life that "what goes round, comes round" if KD did take decisions that were not in the best interests of our club I am sure they will come back to bite him at some point....
|
|
|
Post by Dell12 on Jan 13, 2009 12:50:25 GMT 1
The trouble is many Town fans only read the Examiner who are so far up Davy's backside they can see the back of his teeth! I doubt they'd print a similar article. I am not so sure that the majority of Town fans view KD with rose tinted spectacles. It is fantastic that we Dean Hoyle in charge now and I am sure that contentious issue of the stadium ownership will be raised in years to come. I'm not so sure.... I remember protesting after a particually heavy defeat under Jacko. I think the majority of fans were chanting 'Davy out' and there we're a significant number of fans giving us some abuse! How dare we critisize Davy after he saved the club! I'm not really sure if opinions have changed that much?
|
|
|
Post by stealthdefence on Jan 13, 2009 13:51:39 GMT 1
It will be very interesting what happens when Hoyle takes over, surely Hoyle won't have a signed a secrecy contract? Even if he did, there are many ways to leak this info in to the public domain. Hopefully Clibbens is the man to sort this mess out! I geniunely believe that Davy's long term goal is to sell the 40% back to Hoyle and not to keep them forever
|
|
|
Post by Captainslapper on Jan 13, 2009 14:04:11 GMT 1
I helped out on both FFA's leaflet handouts, and I noticed a big change in attitude between the first and second. the first one we had quite a lot of people arguing the toss, even some being abusive and throwing them back at us. Lots of "We wouldn't have a club if it wasn't for..."etc. At the second handout there was almost none of that and loads of people were slagging Davy off and commenting on how pleased they were FFA were pushing for answers.
There'll still be plenty of fans who won't hear a bad word about davy, but I do think its a minority now and maybe even a small minority. A lot of fans support Town and the Giants in equal measure so I can understand how they'd find it hard to accept the sun doesn't shine out of his ar*e afterall. To me, those who still back davy are either naive in the extreme, or just haven't been informed of the facts since he took over. They probably read Davy's garbage in the YS and write to him to thank him for everything hes done. I bet even davy can't believe it.
|
|
|
Post by mids on Jan 14, 2009 22:15:29 GMT 1
I bet even davy can't believe it. I bet he isn't the only one!!! I wonder if Uncle Ken will make a public farewell at the last game.....we can all show him our appreciation then
|
|
|
Post by shawsie on Jan 14, 2009 23:46:48 GMT 1
Think you are being a bit harsh here stants - some of us have always said we are and will remain grateful to KD for pulling us out of the deep brown stuff. I just hope that whatever does come out paints a full picture which allows us all to fully understand the situation!!!!!!!!! Grateful for pulling us out of the brown stuff.......milking the situation for all it's worth personally to him.....tieing everything up in knots.....removing the football club's assetts.....and then walking away whilst we're still 'potentially' in the brown stuff for years to come due to his dealings......what a saviour!!!! Of course a full picture will be painted, or else he wouldn't be doing his job properly If thats the case mids then we will all be able to judge the position and his actions accordingly and in FULL knowledge of the facts. I dont really know entirely what has gone on and for what reason, much the same as most town fans, but am happy to wait for this detail first. I appreciate your stance here as you have had more contact with KD than most ..............just prefer to make my own mind up when all the facts become public (if they ever do!)
|
|
|
Post by brandnubian on Jan 18, 2009 0:20:10 GMT 1
Are FFA just full of shit in the grand scheme of things?
They have an agenda - negativity
|
|
|
Post by andyhudd on Jan 18, 2009 0:27:49 GMT 1
Nonsense. Come on Ken - you have to do better than that ... Ken Davy has transferred the stadium shares and has stated that he has no plans to return them. Fact. The FFA looked into this, and have found evidence to support it. You come on to a message board ... and post "They have an agenda - negativity" ... where's your evidence? The FFA's claims are based on solid fact. No-one's denying that the shares were transferred. It's just a case how ethical, or otherwise, that act was ... and how damaging it could be to the club.
|
|
|
Post by brandnubian on Jan 18, 2009 0:34:39 GMT 1
We are Ken just coz we won't swallow the crap
ffa quoting facts to back up their hysteria
|
|
|
Post by andyhudd on Jan 18, 2009 0:42:22 GMT 1
What are the FFA saying that you object to? Specifically?
|
|
|
Post by brandnubian on Jan 18, 2009 0:44:38 GMT 1
why are you so slavishingly willing to be taken in by the negativity of ffa
|
|
|
Post by stevvy on Jan 18, 2009 0:46:03 GMT 1
We are Ken just coz we won't swallow the crap ffa quoting facts to back up their hysteria quite frankly i dont think you have a clue as to what you're talking about
|
|
|
Post by brandnubian on Jan 18, 2009 0:48:57 GMT 1
just tow the ffa line there's a good lad
|
|
|
Post by andyhudd on Jan 18, 2009 0:51:12 GMT 1
I'll say it again!
"What are the FFA saying that you object to? Specifically?"
FFA are Town fans - they want the best for Huddersfield Town. They're presented us with hard facts, that Ken Davy himself doesn't deny - it's then our judgement as to whether or not Davy's actions have been in the best interests of HTFC.
You seem to be criticising FFA with no substance to your argument! Please tell me - what have they said that you disagree with?
|
|
|
Post by stevvy on Jan 18, 2009 0:51:25 GMT 1
not a case of towing the ffa line,more a case of looking at the FACTS-not negativity,not an agenda,but FACTS which are most certainly of importance to this club-tell me,are you ken in disguise?because you may as well be
|
|
|
Post by brandnubian on Jan 18, 2009 0:56:32 GMT 1
i support htfc i do not support ffa and never will they have their own agenda i wont buy into it as is my right
|
|
|
Post by stevvy on Jan 18, 2009 0:59:33 GMT 1
yes,it is your right-however ffa's only agenda (if you want to call it that) has been to seek out the truth to answers that affect our football club,and they have done that-they've got the facts,and even ken himself (as has been mentioned) hasnt denied them,eg the share issue-they certainly arent there to promote negativity,theyre there to seek out answers
|
|
|
Post by andyhudd on Jan 18, 2009 1:01:55 GMT 1
Of course - you can hold any opinion you want to - but if you're going to bring it up on this board, then it would be far more constructive if you actually had some substance to your argument. As it stands, it just seems you're objecting for the sake of objecting. Is there any particular reason why? Any facts you dispute? Can you answer these two questions please? 1. Do you think that Ken Davy transferred Town's 40% share in the stadium? 2. If yes, was he right to do so and why?
|
|
|
Post by brandnubian on Jan 18, 2009 1:03:53 GMT 1
no ffa were prejudiced they had made their minds up then dug as much dirt as they could to back up their prejudice without acknowleging there are two sides to every argument
|
|