How would Dickinson do

[karl101]

Just wondering what people think Dickinson would do now we're creating so many chances, i don't think his goal ratio was that bad when we were playing poor football under Stan, i know he's not the best in the air but i reckon he'd of got a few with the quality build up play we are now watching.

[Deleted]

Can we forget about clown feet please

[SaleTerrier]

i think he would score a few as well, but i don't see any reason that Clark will have bid so he'll be off to l**ds anyway. Shame, he would have got a few with the football we're playing now

[philex]

He would be loving it with the amount of chances we're creating, no matter what you thought of him he still got a goal every other game in a team that created very little!

[dogfight]

i think beckett would have had a few in last couple of games

[Captainslapper]

I reckon Id be in double figures by now! ;D

[ShortbreadPete]

I'd deffo be happy with him in the team

[dxterrier]

Although i rate him for his goals, u gotta wonder why derby, who only bought him last summer, are so keen to offload him

[Deleted]

Jan 19, 2009 20:51:52 GMT 1 dxterrier said:

Although i rate him for his goals, u gotta wonder why derby, who only bought him last summer, are so keen to offload him

Because his general play is non league standard

[midge]

Jan 19, 2009 20:39:20 GMT 1 Captainslapper said:

I reckon Id be in double figures by now! ;D

Don't forget Skip, some of us have seen you play!!!! ;D

[monkey]

Doesn't have the right mentality to play in this team

[Captainslapper]

I reckon Id have scored more than jevons and parker just by the law of averages that says every now and then the ball would bounce off my fat backside and fly in.

[WirralTerrier]

Jan 19, 2009 20:58:25 GMT 1 Galpharmer said:

Jan 19, 2009 20:51:52 GMT 1 dxterrier said:

Although i rate him for his goals, u gotta wonder why derby, who only bought him last summer, are so keen to offload him

Because his general play is non league standard

Careful, he scored a few goals for us so some people regard him as a legend in these parts.

In my opinion, he was pants!

[pozza]

Aye, he was that pants he scored 6 goals in just 13 games.

Compare that to Parker who has socred 1 in 17, and Jevons who has scored 6 in 29.

Hard to see why people thinks he's better than what we've already got

[BradfordTerrier]

wouldn't bother dan, he doesn't work hard enough and apparently you can't count free kicks as they are not in open play!!



i'd have him. he'd score a hatful with chances we are creating at the minute

[WirralTerrier]

Jan 19, 2009 22:43:46 GMT 1 pozza said:

Aye, he was that pants he scored 6 goals in just 13 games.

Compare that to Parker who has socred 1 in 17, and Jevons who has scored 6 in 29.

Hard to see why people thinks he's better than what we've already got

Im not saying he doesn't have a better scoring record than Jevons or Parker, Im saying that i didn't rate him as a player and think there are so many better players out there to go for which Clark obviously thinks as hes bid for god knows how many strikers so far. There are loads of players better than what we have already got, it doesn't mean they are gonna suit us though and fit in to the team and improve us.

[Deleted]

Where have i said he isnt better than what we have, that doesnt take much to be fair. However, at 500k its daylight robbery. Dickinson would be a massive waste of money. Clarke wants players who are good enough for the level above, Derby moving him on sort of shows he isnt quite up to it

[pozza]

So 4 goals in 7 at Blackpool is a poor record then?

I know what your both saying, but at the moment were struggling for goals. Dickinson scores goals. Therefore, problem solved

Just because Lee Clark hasn't bid for him doesn't mean he couldn't do a job for us. I'm not saying we should go all out for Dickinson and ignor every other striker available. All i'm saying is that if we did get him, he'd probably end the season as our top scorer.

[Solihull Terrier]

To the goals are everything mob; Andy Payton.

Had a bad attitude but scored goals. The team performed better without him. Different styles of striker but same situation. I don't think the performances we've had over the last two months would be possible with Dickinson in the team. Sure he can score every now and then but at what cost to the rest of the team?

[Deleted]

Jan 19, 2009 23:22:57 GMT 1 Solihull Terrier said:

To the goals are everything mob; Andy Payton.

Had a bad attitude but scored goals. The team performed better without him. Different styles of striker but same situation. I don't think the performances we've had over the last two months would be possible with Dickinson in the team. Sure he can score every now and then but at what cost to the rest of the team?

Finally, someone who saw it how i and the people i sit with did.

[WirralTerrier]

Jan 19, 2009 23:22:57 GMT 1 Solihull Terrier said:

To the goals are everything mob; Andy Payton.

Had a bad attitude but scored goals. The team performed better without him. Different styles of striker but same situation. I don't think the performances we've had over the last two months would be possible with Dickinson in the team. Sure he can score every now and then but at what cost to the rest of the team?

Thankyou Paolo. Been trying to get this across as my point but havnet seemed to be able to achieve it. He would ruin this team, he does not suit us at all and i would be v dissapointed if we spent 500k on him.