|
|
Post by terriers84 on Jan 27, 2009 20:23:40 GMT 1
get it and weres werling ,tom clark instead  |
|
|
|
Post by TomTheTerrier on Jan 27, 2009 20:27:34 GMT 1
What don't you get?
|
|
|
|
Post by terriers84 on Jan 27, 2009 20:29:24 GMT 1
why ainsworth didnt come in instead of roberts
|
|
|
|
Post by Venezuelan Pete on Jan 27, 2009 20:30:00 GMT 1
Clearly Clark thinks Pilks is better suited for the job.
|
|
|
|
Post by BradfordTerrier on Jan 27, 2009 20:30:04 GMT 1
i'm sure clark knows the benefits of each player and therefore where he thinks they will perform better. werling being left out is no surprise, still wont be match fit.
|
|
|
|
Post by Tez on Jan 27, 2009 20:30:07 GMT 1
Hang on!
You've just said Ainsworth is IN for Robbo. Is this what you mean?!
|
|
|
|
Post by andyhudd on Jan 27, 2009 20:30:22 GMT 1
Pilks in for Roberts, Ainsworth's on the bench. Werling's not in the squad.
What's not to understand?
|
|
|
|
Post by Tez on Jan 27, 2009 20:32:30 GMT 1
Pilks in for Roberts, Ainsworth's on the bench. Werling's not in the squad. What's not to understand? So it isn't Ainsy in for Robbo then. It's Pilks.  |
|
|
|
Post by TomTheTerrier on Jan 27, 2009 20:33:50 GMT 1
Just to explain:
Ainsworth plays right wing, Pilkington can play on either wing, which explains why he is in. Cads has been in superb form, so no reason to drop him.
Later in the game we'll see Parker come off, Cads go up top with Jevo and Ainsworth come on down the right.
As for Werling, maybe he isn't match fit yet?
|
|
|
|
Post by Tez on Jan 27, 2009 20:35:07 GMT 1
Werlinger aint match fit yet that's why he aint in the team.
Good luck Pilks & Ainsy... go on lads!!!
|
|
|
|
Post by stevvy on Jan 27, 2009 20:35:20 GMT 1
werling deffo isnt match fit-hasnt played for however long,n only played 2 practice matches since comin in trial/signing for us-he needs more matches
|
|
|
|
Post by CaptainHart on Jan 27, 2009 20:37:27 GMT 1
Tom Clarke offers far more defensive cover.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 27, 2009 20:38:40 GMT 1
Can't really understand Skarz on the bench to be honest. Doesn't look good at all for Worthington.
|
|
|
|
Post by Tez on Jan 27, 2009 20:40:49 GMT 1
TBH think Worthy is on his way out. The lad has done well but I think it's time for the lad to move on.
|
|
|
|
Post by CaptainHart on Jan 27, 2009 20:42:47 GMT 1
Can't really understand Skarz on the bench to be honest. Doesn't look good at all for Worthington. Don't see how that affects Worthy, more interesting for me is that Clark has left Berrett out for the first time. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 27, 2009 20:48:12 GMT 1
Can't really understand Skarz on the bench to be honest. Doesn't look good at all for Worthington. Don't see how that affects Worthy, more interesting for me is that Clark has left Berrett out for the first time. I would have thought Worthy would be a better option than Skarz (and thought the same on Saturday). Same for Berrett, but he's got youth on his side, if Worthington is that far out of Clark's plans then it looks like he'll be on his way. |
|
|
|
Post by AndySk on Jan 27, 2009 21:06:36 GMT 1
Can't really understand Skarz on the bench to be honest. Doesn't look good at all for Worthington. Don't see how that affects Worthy, more interesting for me is that Clark has left Berrett out for the first time. I wouldn't mind Berrett going out on loan for a month. I think he's a cracking little player and could have a big future (hopefully for us) but would definately benefit from some regular first team appearances. Doesn't look like he's going to be getting that with us at the moment. |
|
|
|
Post by terrier08 on Jan 27, 2009 21:55:04 GMT 1
I thought he was great at sweeper in them few games he played
|
|
