|
|
Post by gaz7837 on Feb 3, 2009 11:59:20 GMT 1
If the game were to go ahead tonight my team would be. 4-4-2 GK: Smithies RB: Holdsworth LB: Williams (Assuming Werling is still not match fit) CB: N. Clarke CB: Butler RM: Ainsworth LM: Pilkington CM: Collins CM: Goodwin ST: Parker ST: Cademateri Bench: 1: Glennon 2: Werling 3: T.Clarke 4: Craney 5: Whoever Turns up first with a pair of Boots, You can have Jevons Shirt  Edit: Havn't heard anything official about this lad from Everton, So doesn't feature for me. Another Edit: Seeing as Tehoue can't play, Stick Parker in instead. |
|
|
|
Post by stevvy on Feb 3, 2009 12:00:36 GMT 1
tehoue cant play according to the OS as he wasnt registered before noon
|
|
rage_of_ed
Jimmy Nicholson Terrier
[M0:5]Smile A While...
Posts: 1,578
|
Post by rage_of_ed on Feb 3, 2009 12:00:43 GMT 1
Tehoue definitely won't be playing. Also, where's Jevons gone? |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 3, 2009 12:01:09 GMT 1
dont think The beast can play unfortunatly!
|
|
|
|
Post by gaz7837 on Feb 3, 2009 12:02:10 GMT 1
Tehoue definitely won't be playing. Also, where's Jevons gone? Who Cares!!! |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 3, 2009 12:04:03 GMT 1
It'll be same side as saturday unless that new lad from Everton has actually signed. Id throw him in for Jevons if he has
|
|
|
|
Post by pompeyterrier on Feb 3, 2009 12:08:31 GMT 1
Would you really drop Williams if Werling was fit? That would be so harsh and would send out the wrong message to the players in my opinion. He's in his best form since joining Town and to drop him now would be a right kick in the gonads for him when its least required. Surely its up to Robbie to maintain the shirt and for Werling to await his chance to step in.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 3, 2009 12:13:37 GMT 1
---------------smithies------------------
holdsworth-butler-clarke-williams
ainsworth-goodwin-collins-pilks
-----everton lad hopefully-cadders.
glennon
skarz
t.clarke
berrett
jevons
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 3, 2009 12:14:12 GMT 1
werling in the squad next week in my opinion
|
|
|
|
Post by sjc1980 on Feb 3, 2009 12:14:24 GMT 1
I'd be surprised if there were any changes to the 16 tonight from Saturday - let's be honest, Clark has not exactly been one to make wholesale changes after we lose, never mind win!
The only change that might happen is Lukas for Parker on the bench, if his paperwork is in order & sorted in time.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 3, 2009 12:18:30 GMT 1
Would you really drop Williams if Werling was fit? That would be so harsh and would send out the wrong message to the players in my opinion. He's in his best form since joining Town and to drop him now would be a right kick in the gonads for him when its least required. Surely its up to Robbie to maintain the shirt and for Werling to await his chance to step in. Williams has improved his form of late, but our last 3 results are LLW. In the second half against Peterborough he was poor, indecisive, luckily nothing materialised from it. Werling was brought on further up the field to steady the team in midfield. Yet I can remember at least two crunching tackles at our own conrner flag which got the crowd going, surely that is Williams territory. Personally I'd put Panzer in. I'm not here to nurture and massage players, I want the best for the team and I honestly think we would be stronger with Panzer in from the start. |
|
|
|
Post by runner76 on Feb 3, 2009 12:19:15 GMT 1
It'll be same side as saturday unless that new lad from Everton has actually signed. Id throw him in for Jevons if he has Agree, but maybe Werling for Williams................... |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 3, 2009 12:23:46 GMT 1
I'd bring Werling in left back.
I'd have Ainsy/Pilks/Cads all in, Clark's choice of which one would partner a striker or play just behind. And if the Everton lad is in I'd throw him in for Jevons.
So:
-------------------------------------SMITHIES-----------------------------------
HOLDSWORTH----------CLARKE-----------BUTLER -------------WERLING
AINSWORTH------------COLLINS-----------GOODWIN---------PILKS
-----------------------------CADS
-----------------------------------------------LUKAS
Bench:
Glennon
Clarke
Jevons/Parker
Craney
Williams
|
|
|
|
Post by jonnycrutches on Feb 3, 2009 12:27:07 GMT 1
To be fair to Williams, the tackles Werling was putting in weren't against Williams' man, they were against the advanced full back, so it may have been his zone but not his man. And I agree with Pompey, if the lad is playing well (which he is) then you can't drop him, even for someone as terrifying in the tackle as Werling!
|
|
|
|
Post by terrierspam on Feb 3, 2009 12:34:15 GMT 1
i think we should scrap the crap with 4-4-2 and possibly play 3-5-2
Smithies
Clarke
Berrett
Butler
Holdsworth
Williams!
Goodwin
Craney
Collins, just behind
Pilkington
Cadds
i just dont think ainsworth has enough right now to be a threat when we dont have a goal scorer in the box.
subs:
glen
parker
jevons
werling
clarke
|
|
|
|
Post by BradfordTerrier on Feb 3, 2009 12:37:54 GMT 1
i think we should scrap the crap with 4-4-2 and possibly play 3-5-2 Smithies Clarke Berrett Butler Holdsworth Williams! Goodwin Craney Collins, just behind Pilkington Cadds i just dont think ainsworth has enough right now to be a threat when we dont have a goal scorer in the box. subs: glen parker jevons werling clarke no way he'll do that when 4 4 2 has been so successful at home since clarky arrived. also, no ainsworth at all?? bizarre!!  |
|
|
|
Post by envacuaine on Feb 3, 2009 12:39:12 GMT 1
I don't understand why people are dropping Jevons for Parker!
Tell me how Parker can contribute more than Jevons.
|
|
|
|
Post by digwon on Feb 3, 2009 12:42:21 GMT 1
Ainsworth & Pilkington set to keep there places tonight,just been on sky
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 3, 2009 12:42:58 GMT 1
IMO neither contribute that much.
I guess people would rather have the injection of pace coming off the bench last 15.
|
|
|
|
Post by gaz7837 on Feb 3, 2009 12:50:57 GMT 1
I don't understand why people are dropping Jevons for Parker! Tell me how Parker can contribute more than Jevons. To be honest, they have both been pretty piss poor. Id be putting Parker in because everytime Jevons touched the ball on Saturday he lost it. |
|
|
|
Post by jonnycrutches on Feb 3, 2009 12:57:00 GMT 1
I thought he dropped off quite well on Saturday, involved in some nice passing moves (and he won a header!). Still not much of a goal threat though but he contributes a lot more than Parker's incesant running offside and falling over.
|
|
|
|
Post by sjc1980 on Feb 3, 2009 12:57:23 GMT 1
I don't understand why people are dropping Jevons for Parker! Tell me how Parker can contribute more than Jevons. To be honest, they have both been pretty piss poor. Id be putting Parker in because everytime Jevons touched the ball on Saturday he lost it. It is a little like debating which testicle you'd like removing... Not exactly a choice you want to be making either way! (FWIW - I actually think Jevons has the potential to be a great player, if he was up front with the right kind of player... Just not happening for him. The less said about Parker, the better) |
|
|
|
Post by digwon on Feb 3, 2009 13:01:17 GMT 1
id remove the smallest testicle,:-) not mentioning any names
|
|
rocky
Andy Booth Terrier
Posts: 3,078
|
Post by rocky on Feb 3, 2009 13:07:44 GMT 1
Id be putting Parker in because everytime Jevons touched the ball on Saturday he lost it. Oh really. Take a look at the goal & see if he lost it then. I cant understand why Jevons gets all this stick. 2 goals in his last 5 games shows he coming into form. His career stats tell us he always scores goals. He just needs the right player with him - perhaps that will be one of the loans. Then we get everybody clamoring for Cads to start up front in place of him - the same Cads who has scored 3 goals in 38 games for Town! |
|
|
|
Post by envacuaine on Feb 3, 2009 13:14:56 GMT 1
Id be putting Parker in because everytime Jevons touched the ball on Saturday he lost it. Oh really. Take a look at the goal & see if he lost it then. I cant understand why Jevons gets all this stick. 2 goals in his last 5 games shows he coming into form. His career stats tell us he always scores goals. He just needs the right player with him - perhaps that will be one of the loans. Then we get everybody clamoring for Cads to start up front in place of him - the same Cads who has scored 3 goals in 38 games for Town!Exactly, Is Cads a goal threat. Did he even have a shot on goal last Saturday? I didn't see one. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 3, 2009 13:19:13 GMT 1
My team for tonight for wnybody who cares (nobody ): Smithies Holdworth N. Clarke Butler Williams (but if he messes up at all tonight, Werling vs Bristol Rovers) Ainsworth Goodwin Collins Pilkington Cadamarteri Jevons (seeing as though none of the 3 new strikers will be able to play). Subs: Werling, T. Clarke, Berrett, Craney, Parker Werling coming on (around 60-65mins) to give him a run out (unless Williams is bossing the field... so Werling to come on then ) Parker on for Jevons in second half if Jevons is not offering him only real asset - linking up the play. If we are winning, Berrett on for Collins in about 65-70 mins to keep us in possession as much as possible, not that Collins gives it away a lot, Berrett would read the game and offer a bit more defensive support. |
|
|
|
Post by pompeyterrier on Feb 3, 2009 13:19:59 GMT 1
Cads didn't score nor shoot but he held the ball up, caused havoc for the Peterborough defence, who couldn't cope with him, chased every ball, won many headers, provided the goal, got numerous crosses into the box and got MOTM for his efforts too.
The sort of presence we need at the top end of the field at the moment until the Beast can play!
|
|
|
|
Post by digwon on Feb 3, 2009 13:20:48 GMT 1
it doesnt matter where Cads plays wide or upfront as he`s a nuisance to defenders,where as parker is a nuisance to the linesman
|
|
|
|
Post by gaz7837 on Feb 3, 2009 13:55:22 GMT 1
Id be putting Parker in because everytime Jevons touched the ball on Saturday he lost it. Oh really. Take a look at the goal & see if he lost it then. I cant understand why Jevons gets all this stick. 2 goals in his last 5 games shows he coming into form. His career stats tell us he always scores goals. He just needs the right player with him - perhaps that will be one of the loans. Then we get everybody clamoring for Cads to start up front in place of him - the same Cads who has scored 3 goals in 38 games for Town! Oh Really........erm......YES Cads may not have a great scoring record, But he puts the effort in, Jevons just stands there picking his arse. Im a fat lazy git and I would put more effort in than that thing. |
|
|
|
Post by SN0W on Feb 3, 2009 14:03:07 GMT 1
Cads didn't score nor shoot but he held the ball up, caused havoc for the Peterborough defence, who couldn't cope with him, chased every ball, won many headers, provided the goal, got numerous crosses into the box and got MOTM for his efforts too. The sort of presence we need at the top end of the field at the moment until the Beast can play! Cads did that lovely little flick that the keeper managed to get to.... that was on target and would have been excellent had it come off |
|
