|
Post by Roger on Feb 26, 2009 17:19:18 GMT 1
I heard yesterday from a very reliable source at the club that Tehoue will never play for Huddersfield Town. The club that he is currently on the books for arent going to release him on a free. They want a fee and we arent going to pay for him.
A real shame.
|
|
|
Post by wonderousworthy on Feb 26, 2009 17:21:42 GMT 1
JANSEN or another loan signing
|
|
|
Post by mattyterrier2k8 on Feb 26, 2009 17:42:54 GMT 1
time to get another loan signing in then its a shame because if he did well here it would be one of next seasons problems solved already
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 26, 2009 18:30:09 GMT 1
yes but we have to take into acount that he may not have beenn good enough so i dont really thinnk we have missed out that much
|
|
|
Post by thomo on Feb 27, 2009 9:17:47 GMT 1
steve kabba would have been a decent signing, but he's gone to Oldham
|
|
newboy
Tom Cowan Terrier
[M0:14]
Posts: 713
|
Post by newboy on Feb 27, 2009 9:41:20 GMT 1
Tehoue was playing against Fenerbache and Galatasary last season what makes you think he wouldn't be good enough? ?
Well frustrated about this!!! It's just not going to happen is it?
|
|
|
Post by Captainslapper on Feb 27, 2009 10:19:49 GMT 1
Tehoue was playing against Fenerbache and Galatasary last season what makes you think he wouldn't be good enough? ? Well frustrated about this!!! It's just not going to happen is it? He may have done, but the fact hed be going from that to an english 3rd division side tells a story. His overall career stats suggest hes been a regular failure to varying degrees at a whole host of non-discript european clubs. The one clip we've found of him in that game against Fenebache probably explains why- A great goal ( which is no doubt why the clip is on You tube in the first place) but his overall play was pretty disastrous, with an endless flow of clips of him giving the ball away, dribbling down cul-de-sacs and failing to pass to better placed team mates. A sort of heftier version of Malvin Kamara- lots of potential impact but no footballing brain to exploit it. He was only ever a last minute make-do in case Clark failed to get a proven striker in before the window shut and thats how it turned out. I always thought some fans expectation levels of this guy on here were hugely exaggerated. At the end of the day, if he was good enough to score the goals we'd be wanting him to score, then he wouldn't have been here.
|
|
|
Post by dunnboothbilly on Feb 27, 2009 10:39:35 GMT 1
|
|
|
Post by Sid on Feb 27, 2009 10:42:25 GMT 1
It's amazing how a player can be written off by fans before we have even seen him play.
Players coming to our club have the fans on their back even before they have played.
I'm sure Lee Clark who HAS seen him play is in a better position to decide if he is good enough for us.
It's on the OS now re FIFA having to rule but it is not clear if he is still training with us or not.
|
|
|
Post by Torquayterrier on Feb 27, 2009 10:52:20 GMT 1
Weird, I was pretty much saying what the OP has now confirmed over a week ago but pointed it out as 'pure speculation' on my part. Think I'd better have a go at the lottery this weekend! Seriously though you could tell from a while back that there was more to it than 'international clearance'.
|
|
|
Post by henseventee on Feb 27, 2009 10:53:16 GMT 1
Whats confusing is that they took it on face value that he's a free agent when it takes about 1 minute to find there is a public statement of the extent of his contract available from the Turkish Football Federation, which confirms he is contracted to Konyaspor until 31st of May 2011 and also has the appropriate working visa to cover that period.
That in the first place he left Kasimpasa via a mutual termination 6 months into a 3 year contract to join Konyaspor surely just sends out a few alarm bells that something more than 'believing what you're told on face value' is/was required in this case?
Aaaa-dodgy agent-chooo.
|
|
|
Post by Captainslapper on Feb 27, 2009 12:02:27 GMT 1
It's amazing how a player can be written off by fans before we have even seen him play. Players coming to our club have the fans on their back even before they have played. I'm sure Lee Clark who HAS seen him play is in a better position to decide if he is good enough for us. It's on the OS now re FIFA having to rule but it is not clear if he is still training with us or not. Not writing him off, or at least not trying to. Hopefully if he ever turns out for us he'll do a great job, but I doubt we'll ever see him. All Im saying is its equally amazing how a player can be built up to be the answer to our striking problems before anyones seen him play, when his career history is so uninspiring ,to say the least. Yes, we can only trust in LC who's seen him in training etc but its also fact, admitted by Tehoue himself, that he wouldn't have been signed had LC managed to get any one of the strikers he was after. Like I said, very much a last minute make-do. All Im saying is people should be realistic about how good he probably is,going by the things we know- the video, his career history and LC only signing him at the last minute because none of the strikers he wanted would/could come.
|
|
ram
Andy Booth Terrier
delete account
Posts: 3,496
|
Post by ram on Feb 27, 2009 12:32:34 GMT 1
If waiting for this Player,means we are ignoring other Loan options in the window,if and when he does arrive,He had better be Bloody worth it!......Usual HTAFC opportunity wasted is starting to become a reality!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 27, 2009 13:15:46 GMT 1
Not looked at that clip on youtube TBH, but agree with Cap'n that the quality of the goal is the one and only reason it's on there. We could almost be describing Iffy Onoura here, who was a great crowd pleaser because he gave 100% & was a genuinely good bloke, but he was hardly twinkle toes. You could say Kindon was a slightly more skillful version of Onoura?? Again, another great bloke, probably because he was "old school"... Lower league clubs need that big lump of a centre forward to play alongside someone with an eye for the goal... Stewart & Clyde, Jepson & Booth, Shearer & are the last pairings I can really think of. Mental block as to who Shearer was paired with? Hotte... :-)
|
|
|
Post by Dell12 on Feb 27, 2009 13:25:46 GMT 1
I cannot believe he's being judged on the basis on one Youtube clip! For what it's worth I doubt Jevons/Parker would be anywhere near the ball to be able to lose it in the first place!
Clark obviously thinks he's a good player and that's enough for me!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 27, 2009 13:33:15 GMT 1
I cannot believe he's being judged on the basis on one Youtube clip! For what it's worth I doubt Jevons/Parker would be anywhere near the ball to be able to lose it in the first place! Clark obviously thinks he's a good player and that's enough for me! It's crazy isn't it? The funny thing is though, the youtube clip is vs Fenebahce... a club regularly in the Champions League. Not Cheltenham or Swindon. Anyway, he causes the defence problems in said clip and as a bonus, scores a goal (and hits the post). But I guess that is irrelevant when you can make a detailed analysis at the drop of a hat... on a 2 minute long clip.
|
|
|
Post by Captainslapper on Feb 27, 2009 13:48:49 GMT 1
I look more to his history and Clarks reluctance to sign him until all other options had failed than the clip.
The clip was what people based their opinion on that hes some sort of powerhouse goal machine who'll fire us into the championship isn't it? Im just playing devils advocate and saying considering it was probably made to promote the player, he doesn't even look that good on it ( the goal appart)
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 27, 2009 14:00:40 GMT 1
I look more to his history and Clarks reluctance to sign him until all other options had failed than the clip. The clip was what people based their opinion on that hes some sort of powerhouse goal machine who'll fire us into the championship isn't it? Im just playing devils advocate and saying considering it was probably made to promote the player, he doesn't even look that good on it ( the goal appart) I think the video says more about the person who compiled it than the player. When I watch videos on youtube, I try to take into account that there is all sorts pf sh*t posted on there. For example, there are videos of other players 'skinning' somebody but if you see the full video, you can see that the person has just editted the rest out. So basically all I am saying is, that might not even be the best of him or the worst of him, he may have been having a bad day, he may have been having a good day - wither way, I'll reserve judgement until I see him. Also, maybe Clark delayed in signing him because (as it says on the O/S regarding Tehoue) they didn't know there would be any problems and as he was trying to tie up a transfer alongside Tehoue (that would take longer, or so they thought), so Tehoue's deal played second fiddle due to being the easier of the 2 deals.
|
|
|
Post by Captainslapper on Feb 27, 2009 15:56:02 GMT 1
LC had Tehoue on trial for 2 or 3 weeks before the window shut but left it to the 11th hour of the final day to sign him when all the other possibilities had come to dead ends. It was only after they signed him that these problems came to light when they applied to the turkish FA for his paperwork. If it was me, I wouldn't want to deal with him or his agent again as between them they have messed us around something rotten
|
|
|
Post by Mr_shooter on Feb 27, 2009 16:45:17 GMT 1
have a look at o/s on there saying waiting for fifa to decide and that could take 60 days!!!!!
|
|
town1
Iain Dunn Terrier
Posts: 483
|
Post by town1 on Feb 27, 2009 19:12:58 GMT 1
|
|
|
Post by Dell12 on Feb 27, 2009 19:39:40 GMT 1
LC had Tehoue on trial for 2 or 3 weeks before the window shut but left it to the 11th hour of the final day to sign him when all the other possibilities had come to dead ends. It was only after they signed him that these problems came to light when they applied to the turkish FA for his paperwork. If it was me, I wouldn't want to deal with him or his agent again as between them they have messed us around something rotten Thing is though as he's been on trial with us for about a month (ish) and Clark STILL wants to sign him surely it means he's decent! If it was a panic buy because we hadn't signed anyone else then i'd understand if he was rubbish, but Clark wouldn't still be trying to sign him a month on!
|
|
|
Post by terrier17 on Feb 27, 2009 19:50:47 GMT 1
Thats what i thought dell. Also if he isn't getting paid by us or his turkish club doesn't that mean he can leave his turkish club because of breach of contract?
|
|
|
Post by Dell12 on Feb 27, 2009 19:58:34 GMT 1
Thats what i thought dell. Also if he isn't getting paid by us or his turkish club doesn't that mean he can leave his turkish club because of breach of contract? I'm not sure really. I know it says on the official site that he stay is at no financial cost to us so we're obviously not paying him, but whether not being paid by his former club (when he's not training with them anymore) constututes a break in contract i'm not sure? Cark Factory was pritty full is Sheffield this afternoon too :-)
|
|
|
Post by sunflower on Feb 27, 2009 22:17:05 GMT 1
Get rid, not worth the hassle, his record and number of clubs so far tells me if he was any good he'd have settled somewhere by now. Still time to sign a decent loan elsewhere. Scunthorpe have just got that Odejayi from Barnsley, but he's diabolical i know, hope he scores tomorrow though
|
|