|
|
Post by terrierspam on Feb 28, 2009 17:56:49 GMT 1
we was hammering them all over the pitch! we were by far the better team! why why why why why change it!!!!
why sit back on a 0-1 lead! bad managment decisions today! cost us the playoff stop me thinks
|
|
|
|
Post by jimmymac1964 on Feb 28, 2009 17:58:32 GMT 1
we was hammering them all over the pitch! we were by far the better team! why why why why why change it!!!! why sit back on a 0-1 lead! bad managment decisions today! cost us the playoff stop me thinks wrong tactics,,,,,lets come to terms with it clarky as no idea how to get tactics right away from home,,,,,,and thats a fact,,season over....bye |
|
|
|
Post by pling on Feb 28, 2009 18:00:06 GMT 1
Not just today.
Starting to think Clark is a moron.
|
|
|
|
Post by ShortbreadPete on Feb 28, 2009 18:00:57 GMT 1
Bring back turnip or wadsworth!
|
|
2peregrine
Juvenile Terrier
Michael Collins Terrier
Posts: 23 
|
Post by 2peregrine on Feb 28, 2009 18:02:20 GMT 1
How many goals have we shipped in the last 5 mins of each half ? We would be great if each half only lasted 40 mins.
|
|
|
|
Post by pling on Feb 28, 2009 18:04:08 GMT 1
We would be great if the manager was unable to make tactical changes in games.
|
|
|
|
Post by Torquayterrier on Feb 28, 2009 18:04:15 GMT 1
Whereas we *know* pling is a moron with practically every post he makes...
|
|
|
|
Post by terrierspam on Feb 28, 2009 18:05:26 GMT 1
its just poor all around! why change it the team was running the game and had the pace of it in their hands! just f*cking clueless! very very disappointing! so much potential but so little common sence. so so very unhappy right now!
|
|
|
|
Post by jimmymac1964 on Feb 28, 2009 18:09:28 GMT 1
its just poor all around! why change it the team was running the game and had the pace of it in their hands! just f*cking clueless! very very disappointing! so much potential but so little common sence. so so very unhappy right now! the reason why you are feeling like that ITS HOW CLARK THROUGH AWAY THE 2PTS BECAUSE OF HIS DECISIONS,,,,,,4-4-2 WINNING 1-0 THEN IN MY EYES CARRY ON PLAYING TO SCORE ANOTHER GOAL which we did until the last part of the game WHEN THE TINKERING STARTED,,,,,,AWFUL DECISIONS,,,,,,GOOD BYE TO THE SEASON!!!!!SORRY ABOUT THE CAPS BUT THE REASON WHY I,M PISSED OFF is like i,v said,,,, |
|
|
|
Post by gb1 on Feb 28, 2009 18:15:53 GMT 1
back to the lou macari days
|
|
|
|
Post by presidentwu on Feb 28, 2009 18:28:58 GMT 1
There are a handful of teams spread over the continent who can all but guarantee victory by sitting back on a 1-0 lead, and not one of them being English. Just deserts!! Could never, ever understand that tactic coming from a team who leaks goals for fun. Still not out of the play-off race completely though.
|
|
|
|
Post by pling on Feb 28, 2009 18:37:50 GMT 1
Whereas we *know* pling is a moron with practically every post he makes... bah! like you read all my posts  |
|
|
|
Post by SaleTerrier on Feb 28, 2009 19:47:18 GMT 1
i wondered how long it would take to turn on clark
roberts should have put us 2 up, pilks was free at the back stick and noone picked him out, we had numerous chances but couldnt socre, but then they started to build some pressure - play 3 straight up front with attacking wingers, and we make a defensive sub, i think if they scored and we hadnt made it, a few people would be saying why didnt we
|
|
|
|
Post by pompeyterrier on Feb 28, 2009 19:54:28 GMT 1
i wondered how long it would take to turn on clark roberts should have put us 2 up, pilks was free at the back stick and noone picked him out, we had numerous chances but couldnt socre, but then they started to build some pressure - play 3 straight up front with attacking wingers, and we make a defensive sub, i think if they scored and we hadnt made it, a few people would be saying why didnt we Exactly. It wasn't the tactics that lost us the game guys, it was our inability to go 2 up and kill off the game. Clarks team selection and tactics should have got us 3 goals today at least with great chances for Roberts and Pilkington. I thought we played very well today and for that I think Clark deserves a large bit of credit. |
|
|
|
Post by TomTheTerrier on Feb 28, 2009 19:54:56 GMT 1
What a load of crap, did any of you who say he got it wrong go to the game?!
The own goal was unlucky, there's no way we could plan for anything like that, and it was just from a speculative cross. They didn't pile on the pressure and although we did bring on Lucketti to shore it up at the back, we didn't sit back and we had chances right up to the final whistle, before and after the goal.
What a load of rubbish, tactically I think Clark was spot on, it was an inability to convert chances that costus this game.
|
|
|
|
Post by shelbourne on Feb 28, 2009 19:59:21 GMT 1
So the on his back Clark brigade! are out in force and I bet not one of them went today if we`d taken our chances then we`d have won
You can`t blame Clark for today
|
|
|
|
Post by SaleTerrier on Feb 28, 2009 20:02:25 GMT 1
apears to be a split decision - the ones who went saying it was spot on and players should have scored, whereas the ones who didnt are blaming clark
i wonder who is right....
(this isn't a 'your not allowed your opinion coz you didnt go' but we did have 4 or 5 GOOD chances that we didnt take)
|
|
|
|
Post by pozza on Feb 28, 2009 20:08:50 GMT 1
You can`t blame Clark for today Hang on a second. I seem to remember a certain Stan Ternent coming out after a game we'd not won and saying the tactics he played were spot on, and it was the players fault & there was uproar on here. Folk saying he was the manager & that he should take the brunt of it because he was the manager, but when Clark plays tactics that are spot on and we dont win we're not allowed to say anything and blame the players. Cant have it one rule for one, and one rule for another. I wasn't at the game today, but it wasn't hard to work out that we'd had a load of chances but not managed to score. Maybe if we'd have carried on creating these chances instead of going more defensive in the final quater of the game we might have got another goal. However, hindsight is a wonderful thing. If Stockport hadn't have scored then it wouldn't have even been picked up on. |
|
|
|
Post by TomTheTerrier on Feb 28, 2009 20:12:41 GMT 1
You can`t blame Clark for today Hang on a second. I seem to remember a certain Stan Ternent coming out after a game we'd not won and saying the tactics he played were spot on, and it was the players fault & there was uproar on here. Folk saying he was the manager & that he should take the brunt of it because he was the manager, but when Clark plays tactics that are spot on and we dont win we're not allowed to say anything and blame the players. Cant have it one rule for one, and one rule for another. I wasn't at the game today, but it wasn't hard to work out that we'd had a load of chances but not managed to score. Maybe if we'd have carried on creating these chances instead of going more defensive in the final quater of the game we might have got another goal. However, hindsight is a wonderful thing. If Stockport hadn't have scored then it wouldn't have even been picked up on. We didn't go on the defensive in the final quarter, we kept getting forwards and creating chances. In fairness, at the time, I said that Stan wasn't to blame it was the lapse in concentration from the players. Today the goal was neither Clark's fault tactically, or the fault of the players it was pure bad luck. Tactically, we got it bang on, and created more than enough chances to win the game. The players spurned these chances. |
|
|
|
Post by pozza on Feb 28, 2009 20:15:34 GMT 1
Well on't Radio O'Regan stated 3 or 4 times that we'd started to get deeper, and deeper and deeper going into the final 20 mins of the game so i'm just going on what he was saying.
|
|
BEAST
Iain Dunn Terrier
[M0:1]
Posts: 433
|
Post by BEAST on Feb 28, 2009 21:31:23 GMT 1
What a load of crap, did any of you who say he got it wrong go to the game?! The own goal was unlucky, there's no way we could plan for anything like that, and it was just from a speculative cross. They didn't pile on the pressure and although we did bring on Lucketti to shore it up at the back, we didn't sit back and we had chances right up to the final whistle, before and after the goal. What a load of rubbish, tactically I think Clark was spot on, it was an inability to convert chances that costus this game. Agree 100% on the whole was a great performance today. |
|
|
|
Post by boothylegend on Feb 28, 2009 22:06:02 GMT 1
Well on't Radio O'Regan stated 3 or 4 times that we'd started to get deeper, and deeper and deeper going into the final 20 mins of the game so i'm just going on what he was saying. Well maybe you should take a step back and listen to the opinions of those that were there. We didn't sit back and invite them onto us. They probably pushed us back a bit, but it certainly wasn't as though we were camped in the 6 yard box whilst they pumped ball after ball into the box. I can only remember one half chance they created in the last 10 minutes or so (they only had 4 or 5 in the whole match). I think Clark was right to bring Lucketti on. It's not a sub you'd want to be making every week, but given that we hadn't won away yet, it made sense to bring on an experienced, calming head for the final few minutes. And although some of the "black and white brigade" (that's what I call the people that think we're automatically playing well when we're winning and badly when we're losing) might laugh, I actually thought it worked. Stockport didn't put us on any considerable pressure, it was really just a freak goal, out of pretty much nothing (no sustained pressure or anything...). |
|
|
|
Post by monkey on Feb 28, 2009 22:25:58 GMT 1
Considering our poor away form, and poor goalscoring record, why wouldn't you try sure things up?
|
|
BlackLive
Darren Bullock Terrier
[M0:0]
Posts: 951
|
Post by BlackLive on Feb 28, 2009 22:30:44 GMT 1
his first management position, give the guy a chance, he will get it right with us. we cant just call for a manager to leave. he has and will be good for the future, chill the fuck out
|
|
|
|
Post by specialun on Feb 28, 2009 22:33:38 GMT 1
Agreed blublood
We didn't sit back v northampton (similar game) and he gets criticised for being naive and carrying on attacking. No win situatrion.
Typical town fans - reactive to one goal and not looking at the bigger picture. Smithies had made two excellent saves before changing the shape...do we forget those as it doesn't fit in with the criticism some want to give out? Or the many chances we missed or decided to pass than shoot etc.
|
|
BlackLive
Darren Bullock Terrier
[M0:0]
Posts: 951
|
Post by BlackLive on Feb 28, 2009 22:36:08 GMT 1
Agreed blublood We didn't sit back v northampton (similar game) and he gets criticised for being naive and carrying on attacking. No win situatrion. Typical town fans - reactive to one goal and not looking at the bigger picture. Smithies had made two excellent saves before changing the shape...do we forget those as it doesn't fit in with the criticism some want to give out? Or the many chances we missed or decided to pass than shoot etc. it just reminds me of FIFA08 when i play on xbox, I change my formation to 541 and bring on 2 defensive players when im 1-0 up with 75mins to go. Its only the same thing here, you change to fit the situation and 75% of the time it will work and the rest it won't. It's why he is manager and the rest of you f*ckwits arent! |
|
BlackLive
Darren Bullock Terrier
[M0:0]
Posts: 951
|
Post by BlackLive on Feb 28, 2009 22:38:53 GMT 1
apologies for the swearing and insult throwing... that isnt like me  |
|
|
|
Post by boothylegend on Feb 28, 2009 22:39:26 GMT 1
Agreed blublood We didn't sit back v northampton (similar game) and he gets criticised for being naive and carrying on attacking. No win situatrion. Typical town fans - reactive to one goal and not looking at the bigger picture. Smithies had made two excellent saves before changing the shape...do we forget those as it doesn't fit in with the criticism some want to give out? Or the many chances we missed or decided to pass than shoot etc. Talking of Smithies. I popped onto the Stockport board before and they were saying he was very poor  . I thought he made a couple of excellent saves. |
|
'Uddersfield
Frank Worthington Terrier
[M0:0][N4:#uddersfield#]
Posts: 1,826
|
Post by 'Uddersfield on Feb 28, 2009 22:48:06 GMT 1
I really need to stop reading threads on here, they wind me up beyond belief.
|
|
|
|
Post by Some Random Name on Feb 28, 2009 23:02:02 GMT 1
I really need to stop reading threads on here, they wind me up beyond belief. Thinking exactly the same here  I am starting to think I was at a different match to the one being discussed on here |
|
. I thought he made a couple of excellent saves.
