|
Post by BoltonTerrier on May 11, 2014 16:43:30 GMT 1
A gang name? ?
|
|
|
Post by BoltonTerrier on May 11, 2014 16:44:33 GMT 1
Have you forgotten you've got a thread requesting peoples help elsewhere on the forum? How about showing some humility instead of acting like a hormonal teenage prick? I hope you achieve your targets for your mate Dan, and please god I hope his battles with cancer get easier from here on in, but let me tell you,you ain't helping his cause a right lot with your petulant attitude on here. Out of order reply. A man asking for help for his mate with cancer has no relevance to some middle aged blokes who want to be 18 again at a football match. Piss poor in my opinion. Who wants to be 18? I just dont want to sit in a morgue for yet another season...
|
|
|
Post by Lard Buttie on May 11, 2014 16:46:05 GMT 1
Out of order reply. A man asking for help for his mate with cancer has no relevance to some middle aged blokes who want to be 18 again at a football match. Piss poor in my opinion. it might of been his gang bang reference that upset people( i know you know what it is but i cant resist pasteing it) A gang bang is a situation in which one person engages in physical sexual activity with several individuals sequentially or at the same time. [1] Normally, there is a single individual who is the central focus of the sexual activity; for example, one man or woman surrounded by several men or women. Rather than serial couplings by two people, the gang bang is defined by the number and simultaneity of the various sex acts, such as vaginal, anal or oral sex or double penetration. Gang bangs are not defined by the precise number of participants, but usually involve more than three people and may involve a dozen or more. When the gang bang is organized specifically to culminate with the (near) simultaneous or rapid serial ejaculations of all male participants on the central man or woman, then it may be referred to by the Japanese term bukkake.[2] By contrast, three people engaged in sex is normally referred to as a threesome, and four people are normally referred to as a foursome. Gang bangs also differ from group sex, such as threesomes and foursomes, in that most (if not all) sexual acts during a gang bang are centered on or performed with just the central person. Although the participants of a gang bang may know each other, the spontaneity and anonymity of participants is often part of the attraction. Additionally, the other participants normally do not engage in sex acts with each other, but may stand nearby and masturbate while waiting for an opportunity to engage in sex tbh honest the FML could be rather messy next season Oooooh, think of all the noise that could contribute to an ace atmosphere though
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 11, 2014 16:51:27 GMT 1
Out of order reply. A man asking for help for his mate with cancer has no relevance to some middle aged blokes who want to be 18 again at a football match. Piss poor in my opinion. Who wants to be 18? I just dont want to sit in a morgue for yet another season... Who's talking to you?
|
|
|
Post by BoltonTerrier on May 11, 2014 16:53:19 GMT 1
Who wants to be 18? I just dont want to sit in a morgue for yet another season... Who's talking to you? An open post on a forum with an assumptive generalisation about a group of people. That was my reply. Deal with it.
|
|
Tinpot
Mental Health Support Group
I'm really tinpot
Posts: 22,374
|
Post by Tinpot on May 11, 2014 16:54:52 GMT 1
Out of order reply. A man asking for help for his mate with cancer has no relevance to some middle aged blokes who want to be 18 again at a football match. Piss poor in my opinion. it might of been his gang bang reference that upset people( i know you know what it is but i cant resist pasteing it) A gang bang is a situation in which one person engages in physical sexual activity with several individuals sequentially or at the same time. [1] Normally, there is a single individual who is the central focus of the sexual activity; for example, one man or woman surrounded by several men or women. Rather than serial couplings by two people, the gang bang is defined by the number and simultaneity of the various sex acts, such as vaginal, anal or oral sex or double penetration. Gang bangs are not defined by the precise number of participants, but usually involve more than three people and may involve a dozen or more. When the gang bang is organized specifically to culminate with the (near) simultaneous or rapid serial ejaculations of all male participants on the central man or woman, then it may be referred to by the Japanese term bukkake.[2] By contrast, three people engaged in sex is normally referred to as a threesome, and four people are normally referred to as a foursome. Gang bangs also differ from group sex, such as threesomes and foursomes, in that most (if not all) sexual acts during a gang bang are centered on or performed with just the central person. Although the participants of a gang bang may know each other, the spontaneity and anonymity of participants is often part of the attraction. Additionally, the other participants normally do not engage in sex acts with each other, but may stand nearby and masturbate while waiting for an opportunity to engage in sex tbh honest the FML could be rather messy next season Out of order reply. A man asking for help for his mate with cancer has no relevance to some middle aged blokes who want to be 18 again at a football match. Piss poor in my opinion. Who wants to be 18? I just dont want to sit in a morgue for yet another season... How about a gang bang in a morgue?
|
|
|
Post by BoltonTerrier on May 11, 2014 16:55:35 GMT 1
it might of been his gang bang reference that upset people( i know you know what it is but i cant resist pasteing it) A gang bang is a situation in which one person engages in physical sexual activity with several individuals sequentially or at the same time. [1] Normally, there is a single individual who is the central focus of the sexual activity; for example, one man or woman surrounded by several men or women. Rather than serial couplings by two people, the gang bang is defined by the number and simultaneity of the various sex acts, such as vaginal, anal or oral sex or double penetration. Gang bangs are not defined by the precise number of participants, but usually involve more than three people and may involve a dozen or more. When the gang bang is organized specifically to culminate with the (near) simultaneous or rapid serial ejaculations of all male participants on the central man or woman, then it may be referred to by the Japanese term bukkake.[2] By contrast, three people engaged in sex is normally referred to as a threesome, and four people are normally referred to as a foursome. Gang bangs also differ from group sex, such as threesomes and foursomes, in that most (if not all) sexual acts during a gang bang are centered on or performed with just the central person. Although the participants of a gang bang may know each other, the spontaneity and anonymity of participants is often part of the attraction. Additionally, the other participants normally do not engage in sex acts with each other, but may stand nearby and masturbate while waiting for an opportunity to engage in sex tbh honest the FML could be rather messy next season Who wants to be 18? I just dont want to sit in a morgue for yet another season... How about a gang bang in a morgue? Some people would pay good money for that...
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 11, 2014 16:58:55 GMT 1
i can see it now on a giant flag
THE NECROPHILIACS
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 11, 2014 16:59:54 GMT 1
An open post on a forum with an assumptive generalisation about a group of people. That was my reply. Deal with it. No it wasn't, it was a reply to a piss poor bad taste comment not an open invitation for you to stick you twopenneth in.
|
|
Tinpot
Mental Health Support Group
I'm really tinpot
Posts: 22,374
|
Post by Tinpot on May 11, 2014 17:04:14 GMT 1
An open post on a forum with an assumptive generalisation about a group of people. That was my reply. Deal with it. No it wasn't, it was a reply to a piss poor bad taste comment not an open invitation for you to stick you twopenneth in. It was a reply on an open forum to a piss poor bad taste comment, that included an assumptive generalisation about a group of people. The fact it's an open forum says that every single thing ever written on here is an open invitation to anybody to stick their two penneth in.
|
|
Tinpot
Mental Health Support Group
I'm really tinpot
Posts: 22,374
|
Post by Tinpot on May 11, 2014 17:05:06 GMT 1
i can see it now on a giant flag THE NECROPHILIACS Our new gang name. Winner. That word has a lot of letters, we really are going to need a big flag.
|
|
|
Post by BoltonTerrier on May 11, 2014 17:05:30 GMT 1
An open post on a forum with an assumptive generalisation about a group of people. That was my reply. Deal with it. No it wasn't, it was a reply to a piss poor bad taste comment not an open invitation for you to stick you twopenneth in. Reet. I'll be sure to check with you before posting anything in the near future so I dont intrude into one of your conversations.. My humblest apologies
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 11, 2014 17:06:24 GMT 1
Have you forgotten you've got a thread requesting peoples help elsewhere on the forum? How about showing some humility instead of acting like a hormonal teenage prick? I hope you achieve your targets for your mate Dan, and please god I hope his battles with cancer get easier from here on in, but let me tell you,you ain't helping his cause a right lot with your petulant attitude on here. Out of order reply. A man asking for help for his mate with cancer has no relevance to some middle aged blokes who want to be 18 again at a football match. Piss poor in my opinion. And a mans friend having cancer has no relevance as to why he shouldn't be pulled up for being a dick. Dick
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 11, 2014 17:06:42 GMT 1
No it wasn't, it was a reply to a piss poor bad taste comment not an open invitation for you to stick you twopenneth in. It was a reply on an open forum to a piss poor bad taste comment, that included an assumptive generalisation about a group of people. The fact it's an open forum says that every single thing ever written on here is an open invitation to anybody to stick their two penneth in. That's debatable with these administrators.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 11, 2014 17:08:10 GMT 1
Out of order reply. A man asking for help for his mate with cancer has no relevance to some middle aged blokes who want to be 18 again at a football match. Piss poor in my opinion. And a mans friend having cancer has no relevance as to why he shouldn't be pulled up for being a dick. Dick Are you calling me naughty names now? I for one hope you're not.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 11, 2014 17:08:24 GMT 1
Bloody hell, you can tell our season has finished! Non stop aggro!
|
|
|
Post by Lard Buttie on May 11, 2014 17:09:40 GMT 1
it might of been his gang bang reference that upset people( i know you know what it is but i cant resist pasteing it) A gang bang is a situation in which one person engages in physical sexual activity with several individuals sequentially or at the same time. [1] Normally, there is a single individual who is the central focus of the sexual activity; for example, one man or woman surrounded by several men or women. Rather than serial couplings by two people, the gang bang is defined by the number and simultaneity of the various sex acts, such as vaginal, anal or oral sex or double penetration. Gang bangs are not defined by the precise number of participants, but usually involve more than three people and may involve a dozen or more. When the gang bang is organized specifically to culminate with the (near) simultaneous or rapid serial ejaculations of all male participants on the central man or woman, then it may be referred to by the Japanese term bukkake.[2] By contrast, three people engaged in sex is normally referred to as a threesome, and four people are normally referred to as a foursome. Gang bangs also differ from group sex, such as threesomes and foursomes, in that most (if not all) sexual acts during a gang bang are centered on or performed with just the central person. Although the participants of a gang bang may know each other, the spontaneity and anonymity of participants is often part of the attraction. Additionally, the other participants normally do not engage in sex acts with each other, but may stand nearby and masturbate while waiting for an opportunity to engage in sex tbh honest the FML could be rather messy next season Who wants to be 18? I just dont want to sit in a morgue for yet another season... How about a gang bang in a morgue? Already been done by that silver haired Leeds DJ
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 11, 2014 17:09:56 GMT 1
Ok uwh fair enough, but gang names normally evolve so they have some kind of meaning. They're not agreed on a forum and then changed till it fits what the majority feel. Still not for me though....... If your not embarrassed, you should be. Whether people like the way it's been delivered Cancun Kid does make a valid point. If he feels alienated by us all giving ourselves a "gang name", maybe a lot of others do too. A few more questions: How old are those of us discussing this? If we're all just a clique (I hate the word, but I can see it becoming one) of under 40s, we risk losing a lot of older, noisy buggers. Are those who are staying away from this section of the forum doing so because they're alienated by something (e.g. having a name)? Are those who are alienated by it going to make much noise if they're part of this "ultras" thing? I'm in favour of having a name. I think that whatever is decided, we can't rely on things happening spontaneously (we've been in this ground for 20 years now, if it was going to happen spontaneously then it would have done so by now). It needs some organisation. However, if it's better that we don't have a name, I'm happy with that too. Whether or not to have a name is worth discussing IMO. Truthfully, I wanted to avoid responding to this thread. At no stage on any other thread other than this one have I seen anybody use the term 'gang name'. That was used by the OP. On the 'ultras', it has been used a few times on threads and posts by a few on here. I myself don't want us to have the ultras tag because I don't want my club and the fans I stand with to be known or accosiated with hooligans. I can see the words attraction when trying to build a home end because the word ultra in football has a powerful image. The natural name we end up with will highly unlikely have the word gang or ultra in because it just won't get the backing of the majority IMO. All the FML haters have the right to criticise, but i suggest if your going to criticise that you come up with alternate realistic suggestions to improve the atmosphere which our twenty year old stadium hasn't ever had instead of trying to belittle those that are making big efforts to improve things. 24th May, 1pm, canalside. Air your views there good or bad. But stop winding folk up with your immature posts, you know who you are.
|
|
|
Post by Another moaner on May 11, 2014 17:10:55 GMT 1
I agree with moaner.......on everything
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 11, 2014 17:13:10 GMT 1
You can post as a guest??? God help us all.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 11, 2014 17:13:25 GMT 1
I think the fml haters need to question themselves, people are trying to make a positive contribution to your football club! You still have the right to sit elsewhere and moan all you like.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 11, 2014 17:14:16 GMT 1
Whether people like the way it's been delivered Cancun Kid does make a valid point. If he feels alienated by us all giving ourselves a "gang name", maybe a lot of others do too. A few more questions: How old are those of us discussing this? If we're all just a clique (I hate the word, but I can see it becoming one) of under 40s, we risk losing a lot of older, noisy buggers. Are those who are staying away from this section of the forum doing so because they're alienated by something (e.g. having a name)? Are those who are alienated by it going to make much noise if they're part of this "ultras" thing? I'm in favour of having a name. I think that whatever is decided, we can't rely on things happening spontaneously (we've been in this ground for 20 years now, if it was going to happen spontaneously then it would have done so by now). It needs some organisation. However, if it's better that we don't have a name, I'm happy with that too. Whether or not to have a name is worth discussing IMO. Truthfully, I wanted to avoid responding to this thread. At no stage on any other thread other than this one have I seen anybody use the term 'gang name'. That was used by the OP. On the 'ultras', it has been used a few times on threads and posts by a few on here. I myself don't want us to have the ultras tag because I don't want my club and the fans I stand with to be known or accosiated with hooligans. I can see the words attraction when trying to build a home end because the word ultra in football has a powerful image. The natural name we end up with will highly unlikely have the word gang or ultra in because it just won't get the backing of the majority IMO. All the FML haters have the right to criticise, but i suggest if your going to criticise that you come up with alternate realistic suggestions to improve the atmosphere which our twenty year old stadium hasn't ever had instead of trying to belittle those that are making big efforts to improve things. 24th May, 1pm, canalside. Air your views there good or bad. But stop winding folk up with your immature posts, you know who you are. One word.........Streetwise.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 11, 2014 17:14:43 GMT 1
And a mans friend having cancer has no relevance as to why he shouldn't be pulled up for being a dick. Dick Are you calling me naughty names now? I for one hope you're not. Yes... Couldn't of been much clearer
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 11, 2014 17:16:41 GMT 1
Are you calling me naughty names now? I for one hope you're not. Yes... Couldn't of been much clearer I wouldn't if I was you.......
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 11, 2014 17:20:41 GMT 1
Yes... Couldn't of been much clearer I wouldn't if I was you....... You must get it a lot, no?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 11, 2014 17:21:18 GMT 1
Thought it would be like water off a duck back
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 11, 2014 17:21:34 GMT 1
I wouldn't if I was you....... You must get it a lot, no? Keep them coming lad, I'm waiting
|
|
|
Post by BoltonTerrier on May 11, 2014 17:21:48 GMT 1
Again going nowhere. This board is to constructively discuss the FM Lower for next year. Not for petty squablling. Take it to PM if you want to continue..
|
|