|
|
Post by Stiggy on Jan 10, 2015 14:16:03 GMT 1
open game 2-2 Vaughan & Scanz
|
|
|
|
Post by terriersyndrome on Jan 10, 2015 14:19:03 GMT 1
Score draw.. 1st 3-3 of the season. Wells, Butterfield & Vaughan. Att.. 13258.
|
|
|
|
Post by impact on Jan 10, 2015 14:27:29 GMT 1
2-1 loss. We'll go ahead, defend too deep and then get caught by 2 in 5 mins.
|
|
|
|
Post by teddytheterrier on Jan 10, 2015 15:02:06 GMT 1
2-1 Watford
|
|
|
|
Post by kennyk2 on Jan 10, 2015 15:02:07 GMT 1
Gobern in.
|
|
|
|
Post by halftimebovril on Jan 10, 2015 15:02:42 GMT 1
3-1 wells Vaughan butterfield
|
|
|
|
Post by kennyk2 on Jan 10, 2015 15:05:35 GMT 1
Because Watford fall over like dominoes, my prediction is that they will get a penalty!
|
|
|
|
Post by goodshot (FGS) on Jan 10, 2015 15:06:47 GMT 1
Good selection this week.
|
|
|
|
Post by 3Pipe on Jan 10, 2015 15:16:26 GMT 1
|
|
|
|
Post by 3Pipe on Jan 10, 2015 15:18:22 GMT 1
Great to see my boy Allinson on the bench. Is Murphy still injured?
|
|
|
|
Post by teddytheterrier on Jan 10, 2015 15:19:13 GMT 1
Worrying that Gobern gets in ahead of Majewski!
|
|
|
|
Post by teddytheterrier on Jan 10, 2015 15:19:36 GMT 1
Great to see my boy Allinson on the bench. Is Murphy still injured? Must be mate |
|
deadleg
David Wagner Terrier
Posts: 2,897
|
Post by deadleg on Jan 10, 2015 15:23:27 GMT 1
Looks a wonky side to me at first glance. Is Butterfield on the wing in a 4-4-2? Or Wells out wide in a 4-2-3-1?
|
|
|
|
Post by Stiggy on Jan 10, 2015 15:24:08 GMT 1
Great to see my boy Allinson on the bench. Is Murphy still injured? Must be mate Back in light training apparently. |
|
|
|
Post by swedenterrier on Jan 10, 2015 15:27:06 GMT 1
Looks a wonky side to me at first glance. Is Butterfield on the wing in a 4-4-2? Or Wells out wide in a 4-2-3-1? Or maybe 3-5-2/5-3-2? Smithies Smith-Hudson-Lynch Scannell-Butterfield-Gobern-Coady-Robinson Wells-Vaughan |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 10, 2015 15:27:19 GMT 1
Watford fans on Twitter saying their starting XI is their strongest possible so big challenge today. Would have liked to have seen Billing given a chance instead of Gobern but predicted he wouldn't be
|
|
|
|
Post by goodshot (FGS) on Jan 10, 2015 15:27:50 GMT 1
Looks a wonky side to me at first glance. Is Butterfield on the wing in a 4-4-2? Or Wells out wide in a 4-2-3-1? It's the "kind of 3" at the back system isn't it? |
|
|
|
Post by kaykie on Jan 10, 2015 15:28:17 GMT 1
Worrying that Gobern gets in ahead of Majewski! God forbid us going with an attacking midfielder rather than a defensive 1,you need to wash your mouth out ;-) |
|
|
|
Post by goodshot (FGS) on Jan 10, 2015 15:28:43 GMT 1
Watford fans on Twitter saying their starting XI is their strongest possible so big challenge today. Would have liked to have seen Billing given a chance instead of Gobern but predicted he wouldn't be Must be good with Anya on the bench. |
|
|
|
Post by goodshot (FGS) on Jan 10, 2015 15:29:31 GMT 1
Worrying that Gobern gets in ahead of Majewski! God forbid us going with an attacking midfielder rather than a defensive 1,you need to wash your mouth out ;-) Majewski was poor at their place when he started. |
|
deadleg
David Wagner Terrier
Posts: 2,897
|
Post by deadleg on Jan 10, 2015 15:31:49 GMT 1
Looks a wonky side to me at first glance. Is Butterfield on the wing in a 4-4-2? Or Wells out wide in a 4-2-3-1? Or maybe 3-5-2/5-3-2? Smithies Smith-Hudson-Lynch Scannell-Butterfield-Gobern-Coady-Robinson Wells-Vaughan Yeah I wondered that too, I was put off by the idea of Scannell at wing-back to be honest. Though Hammill at wing-back seemed ridiculous at the start of last season and he played it well. Said it before but I do think 3-5-2 is the best system for us if we want two up front so if that's the case it'll be interesting to see how it goes and if Scannell can do it for a ful 90 minutes. It'd be harsh if we switched to it and there wasn't a place for him after the way he's knuckled down. |
|
|
|
Post by HTAFC Darren on Jan 10, 2015 15:33:39 GMT 1
Think 4-2 to us
Wells gets two, lynch gets one and scannell gets one
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 10, 2015 15:34:58 GMT 1
Oscar fucking gobern... give me strength....
|
|
|
|
Post by Solid Snake on Jan 10, 2015 15:36:16 GMT 1
Looks like we're putting Gobern in the shop window
|
|
|
|
Post by kaykie on Jan 10, 2015 15:41:25 GMT 1
God forbid us going with an attacking midfielder rather than a defensive 1,you need to wash your mouth out ;-) Majewski was poor at their place when he started. That doesnt really mean much does it.vaughan and wells were shite last week |
|
|
|
Post by swedenterrier on Jan 10, 2015 15:43:27 GMT 1
Or maybe 3-5-2/5-3-2? Smithies Smith-Hudson-Lynch Scannell-Butterfield-Gobern-Coady-Robinson Wells-Vaughan Yeah I wondered that too, I was put off by the idea of Scannell at wing-back to be honest. Though Hammill at wing-back seemed ridiculous at the start of last season and he played it well. Said it before but I do think 3-5-2 is the best system for us if we want two up front so if that's the case it'll be interesting to see how it goes and if Scannell can do it for a ful 90 minutes. It'd be harsh if we switched to it and there wasn't a place for him after the way he's knuckled down. Agree with that. If scannell is on the wing/wingback i hope it means smith and gobern will take more defensive responsibilty so scannell can play his game and push forward |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 10, 2015 15:47:22 GMT 1
Wind could mean some fun and games results today
|
|
|
|
Post by goodshot (FGS) on Jan 10, 2015 15:50:14 GMT 1
Majewski was poor at their place when he started. That doesnt really mean much does it.vaughan and wells were shite last week Mean't enough to me. Game completely bypassed him. Tbh I worry about bringing in any of these players who are not match fit like Gobern or Majewski. |
|
|
|
Post by ringdisco on Jan 10, 2015 15:50:35 GMT 1
No striker on the bench......ok
|
|
|
|
Post by ColchTerrier on Jan 10, 2015 15:51:04 GMT 1
Comfy 0-2 away win.
|
|
