|
Post by bluedogs, Esq. on Feb 4, 2015 11:03:54 GMT 1
Thankyou, good news. Desperately good news IMO
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 4, 2015 11:28:50 GMT 1
Lynch being out is a much bigger loss than Nahki.
|
|
|
Post by OldRastrickian on Feb 4, 2015 11:32:01 GMT 1
Did Nahki come back again?
|
|
|
Post by WirralTerrier on Feb 4, 2015 12:30:58 GMT 1
Powell says in that article that its a shame wells had to go off against Leeds as it meant it cut down our options to use later in the game! He had Lolley as a bloody option all game but never used him, he hardly ever makes sub's unless he has to, or with about 5mins remaining so it made no difference at all to our options really with wells going off.
|
|
|
Post by goodshot (FGS) on Feb 4, 2015 12:48:33 GMT 1
Thankyou, good news. Desperately good news IMO Bollocks - desperately bad news about Lynch.
|
|
|
Post by bluedogs, Esq. on Feb 4, 2015 13:29:16 GMT 1
Desperately good news IMO Bollocks - desperately bad news about Lynch. We was talking about Smithies
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 4, 2015 13:30:14 GMT 1
Lynch being out is a much bigger loss than Nahki. at this present moment i agree plus hogg millwall will relish getting about us on saturday we do lack a bit of steel but we will see
|
|
|
Post by AndySk on Feb 4, 2015 14:15:20 GMT 1
Powell says in that article that its a shame wells had to go off against Leeds as it meant it cut down our options to use later in the game! He had Lolley as a bloody option all game but never used him, he hardly ever makes sub's unless he has to, or with about 5mins remaining so it made no difference at all to our options really with wells going off. Yeah that's bollocks from Powell. He talks a good game i'll give him that
|
|
|
Post by galpharm2400 on Feb 4, 2015 15:48:05 GMT 1
got all week to get Gerrard prepared..if we feel we need a bit of uncompromising defending..
|
|
|
Post by goodshot (FGS) on Feb 4, 2015 17:12:42 GMT 1
Bollocks - desperately bad news about Lynch. We was talking about Smithies I was talking about Lynch.
|
|
|
Post by bluedogs, Esq. on Feb 4, 2015 17:21:24 GMT 1
We was talking about Smithies I was talking about Lynch. Lynch will be a big lose, hope Wallace steps up to the task
|
|
|
Post by goodshot (FGS) on Feb 4, 2015 17:51:35 GMT 1
I was talking about Lynch. Lynch will be a big lose, hope Wallace steps up to the task 'orrible going to Millwall but going there weak at the back is asking for double trouble! I'd honestly bring Gerrard in alongside Hudson. Don't see how we can play this "kind of 3 at the back" without Lynch - so it would be a flattish back 4 for me.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 4, 2015 20:20:31 GMT 1
Lynch will be a big lose, hope Wallace steps up to the task 'orrible going to Millwall but going there weak at the back is asking for double trouble! I'd honestly bring Gerrard in alongside Hudson. Don't see how we can play this "kind of 3 at the back" without Lynch - so it would be a flattish back 4 for me. i agree
|
|