Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 29, 2015 16:07:19 GMT 1
How brave are we? Are we happy to cling on to a point and probably get punished late on or do we have a go anyway and try to get all 3
|
|
|
Post by canuckterrier on Aug 29, 2015 16:11:32 GMT 1
How brave are we? Are we happy to cling on to a point and probably get punished late on or do we have a go anyway and try to get all 3 Hope so. But CP has already made his one substitute so I'm not too confident.
|
|
|
Post by teddytheterrier on Aug 29, 2015 16:24:50 GMT 1
Miller getting tired, wonder when Powell will change it?
|
|
|
Post by Baba O'Riley on Aug 29, 2015 16:31:28 GMT 1
Scannell off?
UTT
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 29, 2015 16:31:51 GMT 1
Who would you bring on for Miller? Powell has a fair bit of choice - Bojaj, Bunn, Lolley...
|
|
|
Post by workshyfop on Aug 29, 2015 16:32:12 GMT 1
Is Scannell injured? Lolley gets his chance. C'mon Town!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 29, 2015 16:33:13 GMT 1
You can't have two wingers on the pitch at the same time in a home game, too dangerous
|
|
|
Post by Solihull Terrier on Aug 29, 2015 16:33:41 GMT 1
Scannell sounded to be playing well, not fully fit maybe?
|
|
|
Post by Norn Iron Terrier on Aug 29, 2015 16:34:03 GMT 1
Message from JanHarrier, 'QPR now like Blackpool for the draw or you will lose six nil to a Lolley double hat trick, the choice is yours'
|
|
|
Post by teddytheterrier on Aug 29, 2015 16:33:55 GMT 1
Brings most attacking threat on the pitch off, leaves miller on!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 29, 2015 16:36:43 GMT 1
Criticised for leaving the flagging scanz on last home game Now for taking him off
|
|
|
Post by canuckterrier on Aug 29, 2015 16:37:30 GMT 1
Lynch having a good game. I always feel the team play well when he does.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 29, 2015 16:43:31 GMT 1
Christ on a stick, he's playing for the effing draw again! Taken off a striker and added a winger. Powell.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 29, 2015 16:44:03 GMT 1
Wells off for Crayola.
|
|
|
Post by 3Pipe on Aug 29, 2015 16:44:36 GMT 1
One mistake and bam.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 29, 2015 16:44:28 GMT 1
QPR score,,,,,
|
|
|
Post by canuckterrier on Aug 29, 2015 16:44:40 GMT 1
NO! We were playing so well dammit!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 29, 2015 16:44:32 GMT 1
Christ on a stick, he's playing for the effing draw again! Taken off a striker and added a winger. Powell. How can you actually believe that? Really mate? Playing for the draw? Fuck me
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 29, 2015 16:45:22 GMT 1
What a surprise, Powell plays for the draw and ends up losing the point.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 29, 2015 16:45:41 GMT 1
What a surprise, Powell plays for the draw and ends up losing the point. Bullshit
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 29, 2015 16:46:45 GMT 1
Christ on a stick, he's playing for the effing draw again! Taken off a striker and added a winger. Powell. How can you actually believe that? Really mate? Playing for the draw? Fuck me He took off one of 2 strikers to go 4-5-1 with a lone striker. How is that going for the win? Fuck me indeed. And what happened when we changed shape?
|
|
|
Post by SaudiTerrier on Aug 29, 2015 16:46:34 GMT 1
Someone please take substitution duties off Powell, I like him but I don't think he's ever made a good substitution for us.
Were playing well up until that goal.
Can't believe we haven't managed to score against these lot though.. even Rotherham got 2.
|
|
|
Post by canuckterrier on Aug 29, 2015 16:47:35 GMT 1
What a surprise, Powell plays for the draw and ends up losing the point. I don't think you can accuse him of that in this game. He's made a kind for kind with all 3 subs.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 29, 2015 16:47:38 GMT 1
How can you actually believe that? Really mate? Playing for the draw? Fuck me He took off one of 2 strikers to go 4-5-1 with a lone striker. How is that going for the win? Fuck me indeed. And what happened when we changed shape? You're as bad as Nick mate
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 29, 2015 16:48:08 GMT 1
What a surprise, Powell plays for the draw and ends up losing the point. Bullshit Explain how going from 2 strikers to 1 is going for the win again? Powell's negative substitution has just wasted a point.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 29, 2015 16:48:38 GMT 1
Could be a long season. Not getting any points even when we play well
|
|
|
Post by iangreaves on Aug 29, 2015 16:48:54 GMT 1
In the bottom three, I'm afraid.Will be gloomy on here tonight.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 29, 2015 16:49:24 GMT 1
What a surprise, Powell plays for the draw and ends up losing the point. I don't think you can accuse him of that in this game. He's made a kind for kind with all 3 subs. So Wells a midfielder or is Carayol a striker? It looked to me, that he took off a striker and brought on a midfielder, just before we conceded again.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 29, 2015 16:49:44 GMT 1
Explain how going from 2 strikers to 1 is going for the win again? Powell's negative substitution has just wasted a point. Explain how it means Powell is playing for the draw, and justify it, and I will address your preposterous notion
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 29, 2015 16:51:58 GMT 1
Explain how going from 2 strikers to 1 is going for the win again? Powell's negative substitution has just wasted a point. Explain how it means Powell is playing for the draw, and justify it, and I will address your preposterous notion Taking off a striker to bolster midfield is a defensive reshape, not an attacking one. It did not increase our attack, it decreased it - It also didn't work again.
|
|