Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Wolves
Oct 3, 2015 13:30:53 GMT 1
via mobile
Post by Deleted on Oct 3, 2015 13:30:53 GMT 1
carrying carayol again..we cant afford to carry a player.. miller has had more of the ball than the wolves forwards and still he moans like fuck.. should shoot but has another poor touch and gives it away.. ishmael it isnt fucking you who should be moaning?? poor shot from huws.. goal was just consistent of our ability to give away the ball, run off, make a couple of badly judged challenges and concede a really soft one.. overall, pub league standard game being played in a very quiet graveyard somewhere... If we are carrying Carayol what on earth do you think of Scannells contribution?! Carayol had beaten his man more often than not, won corners and throw ins, put crosses into the box, been available to recieve the ball from his fullback. What more is he expected to do?!
|
|
|
Wolves
Oct 3, 2015 13:30:53 GMT 1
via mobile
Post by Christ in Shades (art) on Oct 3, 2015 13:30:53 GMT 1
Not a bad performance but we are very pedestrian, we need to up the tempo as there is something for us in this game, Wolves look average. Dominate first 20 minutes no goal then we give away a bloody shocking goal, a crap skyward header, 2 missed tackles and its in the back of the net. Huws has got to do better with that chance.
Take Scannell off and bring on Paterson, give Miller 20 minutes then bring Wells on.
|
|
|
Wolves
Oct 3, 2015 13:31:19 GMT 1
Post by ringdisco on Oct 3, 2015 13:31:19 GMT 1
We loaned him out when he was the only proper alternative to Scannel. Who are these 2 right wingers we brought in so we could loan Lolley out? Hes not an alternative to Scannel though imo Powell won't trust Lolley playing on the wing because of what he offers defensively, i think his only chance would be to play in a similar role to that of Bunn today. We loaned Paterson who arguably has played his best football on the right wing although Iam aware that you read on some stats site that his main position in central. What does Carayol offer defensively?
|
|
|
Post by Chips Longhorn on Oct 3, 2015 13:31:31 GMT 1
Decent stats except for the one that matters. I think classing Miller and Huws' mild passes to the Wolves keeper as "shots on target" is a bit rich. Though if they had been wolves shots you would have said "fucking hell we're allowing them to have two more shots on target "
|
|
|
Wolves
Oct 3, 2015 13:31:51 GMT 1
Post by philincalifornia on Oct 3, 2015 13:31:51 GMT 1
town are so ponderous i am looking for the fast forward button It's like only third gear is allowed. ?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Wolves
Oct 3, 2015 13:32:14 GMT 1
Post by Deleted on Oct 3, 2015 13:32:14 GMT 1
We're still in this and not playing badly. Get Paterson on for Bunn to bring a bit more to midfield and some creativity.
|
|
|
Wolves
Oct 3, 2015 13:32:59 GMT 1
Post by galpharm2400 on Oct 3, 2015 13:32:59 GMT 1
carrying carayol again..we cant afford to carry a player.. miller has had more of the ball than the wolves forwards and still he moans like fuck.. should shoot but has another poor touch and gives it away.. ishmael it isnt fucking you who should be moaning?? poor shot from huws.. goal was just consistent of our ability to give away the ball, run off, make a couple of badly judged challenges and concede a really soft one.. overall, pub league standard game being played in a very quiet graveyard somewhere... So no positives whatsoever ? positives are wolves are no great shakes.. tough division made harder by always conceeding shit , piss poor goals.. positive is we could win this game.. we might concede another couple as well.. the slower we play the worse we look.. who knows what town team will come out in the second half, you can bet your arse powell doesent..
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 3, 2015 13:33:09 GMT 1
Where our rep in the pundit panel? An ex Wolves player and Ian Holloway. Cheers Sky It does seem like Holloway is a closet Town fan. It feels like he's on the verge of gushing about us and then they ask a question about Wolves! Better choice than that sniveling little git from Bradford that they often wheel out to provide comment on our games.
|
|
|
Wolves
Oct 3, 2015 13:34:19 GMT 1
via mobile
Post by Chips Longhorn on Oct 3, 2015 13:34:19 GMT 1
Ita very average fayre I m o .. but we aren't the second best team so far.. still in it (though my 3-0 prediction stands )
|
|
jjamez
Iain Dunn Terrier
[M0:0]
Posts: 498
|
Wolves
Oct 3, 2015 13:35:36 GMT 1
Post by jjamez on Oct 3, 2015 13:35:36 GMT 1
Where our rep in the pundit panel? An ex Wolves player and Ian Holloway. Cheers Sky It does seem like Holloway is a closet Town fan. It feels like he's on the verge of gushing about us and then they ask a question about Wolves! Better choice than that sniveling little git from Bradford that they often wheel out to provide comment on our games. holloway has been pretty fair, but it has been heavily wolves based since the start of the programme
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Wolves
Oct 3, 2015 13:35:46 GMT 1
Post by Deleted on Oct 3, 2015 13:35:46 GMT 1
Not a bad performance but we are very pedestrian, we need to up the tempo as there is something for us in this game, Wolves look average. Dominate first 20 minutes no goal then we give away a bloody shocking goal, a crap skyward header, 2 missed tackles and its in the back of the net. Huws has got to do better with that chance. Take Scannell off and bring on Paterson, give Miller 20 minutes then bring Wells on. I doubt huws got a shout from his team mates otherwise I think he would have brought it down. That is where the problem started. It's so quiet there I'm sure he could have heard me shouting from my sofa.
|
|
|
Post by sonny on Oct 3, 2015 13:36:40 GMT 1
Carayol just oozes commitment doesn't he?
|
|
|
Wolves
Oct 3, 2015 13:36:47 GMT 1
Post by galpharm2400 on Oct 3, 2015 13:36:47 GMT 1
carrying carayol again..we cant afford to carry a player.. miller has had more of the ball than the wolves forwards and still he moans like fuck.. should shoot but has another poor touch and gives it away.. ishmael it isnt fucking you who should be moaning?? poor shot from huws.. goal was just consistent of our ability to give away the ball, run off, make a couple of badly judged challenges and concede a really soft one.. overall, pub league standard game being played in a very quiet graveyard somewhere... If we are carrying Carayol what on earth do you think of Scannells contribution?! Carayol had beaten his man more often than not, won corners and throw ins, put crosses into the box, been available to recieve the ball from his fullback. What more is he expected to do?! scannell never, ever gets the ball without someone up his arse and he never gets support when it goes to him.. the right hand side for town is a wasteland ... carayol dropped off and started doing things at no miles an hour.. he has the space on his side to play, scannell hasnt..
|
|
|
Post by Headless Chicken on Oct 3, 2015 13:37:04 GMT 1
I wonder if any neutrals managed to watch it to halftime.
|
|
|
Wolves
Oct 3, 2015 13:39:04 GMT 1
Post by galpharm2400 on Oct 3, 2015 13:39:04 GMT 1
clearly the most bottle shown today is the wolves board charging 30 quid plus to watch this.. pub standard for quite a lot of it so far..
|
|
|
Wolves
Oct 3, 2015 13:41:11 GMT 1
Post by 3Pipe on Oct 3, 2015 13:41:11 GMT 1
Ojo was a man who thought he was a loaner.
|
|
|
Wolves
Oct 3, 2015 13:42:29 GMT 1
Post by rantinray on Oct 3, 2015 13:42:29 GMT 1
Not a bad performance but we are very pedestrian, we need to up the tempo as there is something for us in this game, Wolves look average. Dominate first 20 minutes no goal then we give away a bloody shocking goal, a crap skyward header, 2 missed tackles and its in the back of the net. Huws has got to do better with that chance. Take Scannell off and bring on Paterson, give Miller 20 minutes then bring Wells on. Afraid to say that this is our usual state of affairs. There were times when I thought we had got past giving goals away cheaply. Whats the answer? Someone needs to resolve our state of play, either different shape or different players?
|
|
|
Post by 3Pipe on Oct 3, 2015 13:42:22 GMT 1
Huge let off for Town there.
|
|
|
Wolves
Oct 3, 2015 13:42:48 GMT 1
via mobile
Post by sonny on Oct 3, 2015 13:42:48 GMT 1
Davidson is pure garbage
|
|
|
Wolves
Oct 3, 2015 13:42:42 GMT 1
via mobile
Post by impact on Oct 3, 2015 13:42:42 GMT 1
How many times have we got ripped to shreds down our left this year?
|
|
|
Wolves
Oct 3, 2015 13:43:08 GMT 1
via mobile
Post by Chips Longhorn on Oct 3, 2015 13:43:08 GMT 1
clearly the most bottle shown today is the wolves board charging 30 quid plus to watch this.. pub standard for quite a lot of it so far.. Though you're sat there in front of your TV on a lovely October Saturday
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 3, 2015 13:43:05 GMT 1
Not keen on the left back
|
|
|
Wolves
Oct 3, 2015 13:43:18 GMT 1
Post by Doc Halladay 32 on Oct 3, 2015 13:43:18 GMT 1
Carayol's tracking back is embarrassing
|
|
|
Wolves
Oct 3, 2015 13:45:21 GMT 1
Post by rantinray on Oct 3, 2015 13:45:21 GMT 1
Chaos on the edge of Towns penalty area, sounds very familiar. Town shoot at goal Oggy, you are joking.
|
|
k1man999
Andy Booth Terrier
Posts: 3,521
Member is Online
|
Wolves
Oct 3, 2015 13:45:12 GMT 1
Post by k1man999 on Oct 3, 2015 13:45:12 GMT 1
get crayon off not tracking back doesn't look interested now
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Wolves
Oct 3, 2015 13:45:13 GMT 1
via mobile
Post by Deleted on Oct 3, 2015 13:45:13 GMT 1
ffs Miller
|
|
|
Wolves
Oct 3, 2015 13:45:14 GMT 1
Post by ringdisco on Oct 3, 2015 13:45:14 GMT 1
What is going on.....hoof it ffs
|
|
|
Wolves
Oct 3, 2015 13:45:08 GMT 1
via mobile
Post by impact on Oct 3, 2015 13:45:08 GMT 1
Our final third play has been terrible.
|
|
|
Post by philincalifornia on Oct 3, 2015 13:45:36 GMT 1
I think we may have just gone below pub standard there.
|
|
|
Wolves
Oct 3, 2015 13:45:47 GMT 1
via mobile
Post by Giggity on Oct 3, 2015 13:45:47 GMT 1
Davidson is not a patch on what we had last year. Cheap option indeed.
|
|