Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 21, 2015 0:03:32 GMT 1
Maximums for the Reading game from detox (5 - you are allowed to predict the scorers, you know!), 3Pipe (5), @harrison and kilnerbanker (both 6) and halftimebovril (7). The less said about Dirty Leeds the better.  |
|
|
|
Post by 3Pipe on Nov 21, 2015 0:15:11 GMT 1
Big jump of 6 places for the Pipeicus.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 21, 2015 11:23:26 GMT 1
hi tax just wondering something ,is it correct that you get 2 points for correct result but not correct score , as i predicted leeds to beat town but didnt get the correct score right ,as ive just looked at table and still on same points as i was when you put the previous table up after burnley game
|
|
|
|
Post by Stewpot on Nov 21, 2015 12:06:52 GMT 1
hi tax just wondering something ,is it correct that you get 2 points for correct result but not correct score , as i predicted leeds to beat town but didnt get the correct score right ,as ive just looked at table and still on same points as i was when you put the previous table up after burnley game If the rules are still the same as posted for 2013 / 2014 it does say 2 points if you predict the correct result, but not the correct score. |
|
|
|
Post by Stewpot on Nov 21, 2015 12:11:48 GMT 1
Big jump of 6 places for the Pipeicus. I keep forgetting to post, so still languishing in 28th place. My PPE is none too shabby, so as with Town, the start of a new era. Up the table we will go....... |
|
