|
|
Post by kennyk2 on Apr 6, 2016 7:35:47 GMT 1
Admins please read. Just something that you may wish to consider.
I've noticed this for a while, but the post above prompted me to express my views on this. I welcome the right for posters to express their opinions and many often will, quite vociferously at times. However, there is a fine line between this and purposely posting to wind-up the majority. This seems to be the case with one or two visiting posters from other teams, although I welcome people such as Marshleeds and Bilo who offer witty and often constructive comments to the debate.
What is probably rather underhand is to post something that is inflammatory and then disappear for 12 months as soon as there is a response. The only interest that this type of visiting poster has in this board is when their team play Town after which the disappear into the ether, thoroughly self-satisfied with their contribution. I note that some posters from Bradford, Burnley, Blackburn, Leeds and Sheffield Wednesday fall into this category.
Perhaps it's time to disable the accounts of some of these people. This board is for Town fans with the club at heart isn't it, or are we obliged to be more inclusive?
|
|
|
|
Post by jakerubery on Apr 6, 2016 15:47:50 GMT 1
Thought the Wednesday fans were great yesterday, hope they go up. Good support from Wendies fans, pity about the team & the cheating little Italian git - UTT. The "cheating little Italian git" caused you lot some problems, didn't he? Your manager couldn't keep Hudson on after that second foul. One of your supporters wrote to the Sheffield Telegraph "He went down 11 times in the game. He was clearly fouled on 3 of those times, 2 of those were yellow card challenges. Hudson got booked. Whitehead should have been booked but escaped.". I agree he over-reacts. It's a defense mechanism. Stops him getting his legs broken, see? And he's learning. He's probably grateful to have low-grade thugs your calibre of players take a lunge at him, as it will sharpen his skills. Read more: www.thestar.co.uk/sport/football/sheffield-wednesday/sheffield-wednesday-forestieri-blast-at-hudson-1-7831210#ixzz453bUaWGm |
|
|
|
Post by kennyk2 on Apr 6, 2016 16:29:35 GMT 1
Good support from Wendies fans, pity about the team & the cheating little Italian git - UTT. The "cheating little Italian git" caused you lot some problems, didn't he? Your manager couldn't keep Hudson on after that second foul. One of your supporters wrote to the Sheffield Telegraph "He went down 11 times in the game. He was clearly fouled on 3 of those times, 2 of those were yellow card challenges. Hudson got booked. Whitehead should have been booked but escaped.". I agree he over-reacts. It's a defense mechanism. Stops him getting his legs broken, see? And he's learning. He's probably grateful to have low-grade thugs your calibre of players take a lunge at him, as it will sharpen his skills. Read more: www.thestar.co.uk/sport/football/sheffield-wednesday/sheffield-wednesday-forestieri-blast-at-hudson-1-7831210#ixzz453bUaWGm! |
|
|
|
Post by teddytheterrier on Apr 6, 2016 17:22:18 GMT 1
Really? I find Wednesday fans to be a set of delusional mongs, even more so than the champions of europe. Just had a quick browse on there forum and its the usual 'we think we are a big club but nobody else does syndrome'. For some bizarre reason they think we hate them and are trying to stir a rivalry up? Newsflash Wednesday fans, the feelings more than mutual 99 percent of town fans genuinelly couldnt give a shit when we play you its just nice to get a few away fans behind the gates. They find it hard to admit that clubs like little old Huddersfield dont think there a big deal. Got more of a rivalry with Oldham, Peterborough and Halifax than them dipsticks never mind Bradford, Leeds, Barnsley etc. Would agree regarding there not being much of a rivalry there, think for town it's more leeds and bradford, then lesser rivals like Peterborough, Oldham and Barnsley after them two. |
|
