|
|
Post by mrg on Mar 6, 2017 14:16:48 GMT 1
Gayle has been a twat since the day he was born. We've got previous with him. He might as well of played for L666s. I had/have tremendous respect for you as a club and a town, proper northern people who understand football and life quite well. I'm sat opposite one of your girls in our office today and she's embarrassed by how shit you were on Saturday, she understands football. £50m and that's all you come up with, putting 10 players behind the ball at Huddersfield? To be fair it's the only way to beat us, but the first penalty is nothing other than embarrassing premier league bullshit. English lads didn't used to cheat like that, it's embarrassing. You won 3-1, the end. I might have calmed down by tomorrow night  Oh well if a pass in the office says it then it must be true. If it's the only way to beat you then it's probably a sensible decision to play that way, then. We spent the money we did to build a side good enough to be promoted. So far so good.steve McClaren tried to set us up to play attractive football every game last season, it was naive and got us relegated. We're top because when circumstances demand it we can adapt. Possession football that doesn't carry a threat is described as "all fart nee shite" up our way A pass? It was a threat though wasn't it, that's why you put ten men behind the ball right? McLaren, way did you even fucking employ that faggot? If anyone with a brain in their head had spent that money they wouldn't have been relegated. How that cockney wanker doing you've got running the joint? |
|
|
|
Post by mrg on Mar 6, 2017 14:17:36 GMT 1
Warning. Contains offensive language. (Apologies if posted elsewhere). That lad won them the game, had a belter, right dirty little fucker, I liked him. |
|
|
|
Post by jonjo on Mar 6, 2017 14:22:01 GMT 1
some managers get all the press and publicity after throwing copious amounts of someone elses cash about of overpriced and overhyped players. Benitez is one of those. NOt saying he's a bad manager but he needs a shit load of cash to spend to get anywhere. He would not be able to do a job with little or very little resources. Then there's David Wagner. A proper football manager who can put together a team for less than it cost for one newcastle player. Interesting to see if he could get a £4 million playing squad promoted from the Championship as champions. I wonder how DW would do with a squad worth £100 million. Perhaps well or perhaps he's just stumbled on a winning formula. Like Pardew did the season we finished 5th. Comparing him to Benitez who has built winning teams all over Europe is absurd. |
|
|
|
Post by jonjo on Mar 6, 2017 14:26:11 GMT 1
A pass? It was a threat though wasn't it, that's why you put ten men behind the ball right? McLaren, way did you even fucking employ that faggot? If anyone with a brain in their head had spent that money they wouldn't have been relegated. How that cockney wanker doing you've got running the joint? I meant lass of course. Some choice language from you here well done! It wasn't a threat because we stopped it being such, that's why you were restricted to long distance efforts for most of the game. Your team didn't have a plan B that it was able to execute, simple as that really. |
|
|
|
Post by rothwellterrier on Mar 6, 2017 14:34:51 GMT 1
some managers get all the press and publicity after throwing copious amounts of someone elses cash about of overpriced and overhyped players. Benitez is one of those. NOt saying he's a bad manager but he needs a shit load of cash to spend to get anywhere. He would not be able to do a job with little or very little resources. Then there's David Wagner. A proper football manager who can put together a team for less than it cost for one newcastle player. Suppose the managers that have established themselves over decades sufficiently to get jobs at richer clubs should decline transfer funds so as to prove themselves against Wagner then huh? No, of course not but then there's spending a shed load and still being "disappointed and surprised" when you can't spunk more in the Jan transfer window: "Benitez did not add to his squad during the January window and, speaking after the game, indicated he was hoping to strengthen but was not given the backing to do so.
"My decision was very clear, [but] it was not my decision," the Spaniard, who had been keen to lure Andros Townsend back to Tyneside from Crystal Palace, told Sky Sports. "I said what I wanted and needed, and what the team needed, and that was it."
He later added in his press conference: "I can't change things now. We knew what we needed and we knew what we have.
"I'm disappointed (not to have signed anyone) but I have to concentrate on the players we have."
When asked if he was surprised at the club's lack of signings, he added: "Yes."
And when questioned if he could reveal what went wrong on deadline day, the former Real Madrid boss said: "No, because I don't know."[/i][/font] |
|
|
|
Post by mrg on Mar 6, 2017 14:37:03 GMT 1
A pass? It was a threat though wasn't it, that's why you put ten men behind the ball right? McLaren, way did you even fucking employ that faggot? If anyone with a brain in their head had spent that money they wouldn't have been relegated. How that cockney wanker doing you've got running the joint? I meant lass of course. Some choice language from you here well done! It wasn't a threat because we stopped it being such, that's why you were restricted to long distance efforts for most of the game. Your team didn't have a plan B that it was able to execute, simple as that really. £50m might buy them a diving twat, 11 more points, a weak ref and the ability to do that I reckon. Thanks for sharing, I'll mention it to Dean in the next supporters meeting |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 6, 2017 14:41:47 GMT 1
Can't really understand the reaction from some on here. You weren't controlling possession because you're a vastly superior footballing side. You were controlling it because Rafa set up to let you and the ability to control the game without the ball is something I'd never seen from a Newcastle side before we got him. It worked and you were restricted to long range efforts. The goals weren't lucky. The penalties were as contentious as each other. If we didn't have a lead we'd have been more adventurous but we did have it so didn't need go be gung ho. We don't play like that every week. It's horses for courses and we came with a game plan that we executed superbly. We're not naive enough to think we can go anywhere, play like Brazil and win. We've dominated some games this season in terms of possession but Saturday was one of our best showings in ages. The suggestion that we've had referees is laughable too. We've spent most games this season in the opposition half yet curiously conceded more penalties than we've been awarded. No team in the league will suffer a referee like we had to versus Forest away in December. Two rescinded red cards! Don't think Gayle was being particularly offensive either. I agree with you, that's exactly how i saw the game. I'm 100% convinced that it would have played out very differently had that first penalty not been given. |
|
|
|
Post by mrg on Mar 6, 2017 14:43:26 GMT 1
Can't really understand the reaction from some on here. You weren't controlling possession because you're a vastly superior footballing side. You were controlling it because Rafa set up to let you and the ability to control the game without the ball is something I'd never seen from a Newcastle side before we got him. It worked and you were restricted to long range efforts. The goals weren't lucky. The penalties were as contentious as each other. If we didn't have a lead we'd have been more adventurous but we did have it so didn't need go be gung ho. We don't play like that every week. It's horses for courses and we came with a game plan that we executed superbly. We're not naive enough to think we can go anywhere, play like Brazil and win. We've dominated some games this season in terms of possession but Saturday was one of our best showings in ages. The suggestion that we've had referees is laughable too. We've spent most games this season in the opposition half yet curiously conceded more penalties than we've been awarded. No team in the league will suffer a referee like we had to versus Forest away in December. Two rescinded red cards! Don't think Gayle was being particularly offensive either. I agree with you, that's exactly how i saw the game. I'm 100% convinced that it would have played out very differently had that first penalty not been given. That's the point mate. I'm going to get some work done now |
|
|
|
Post by jonjo on Mar 6, 2017 14:43:56 GMT 1
I meant lass of course. Some choice language from you here well done! It wasn't a threat because we stopped it being such, that's why you were restricted to long distance efforts for most of the game. Your team didn't have a plan B that it was able to execute, simple as that really. £50m might buy them a diving twat, 11 more points, a weak ref and the ability to do that I reckon. Thanks for sharing, I'll mention it to Dean in the next supporters meeting For sure. Ritchie, a booking away from a two game ban, took a dive under the ref's nose. The replay of his heels being clipped was CGI because we paid Sky off too |
|
|
|
Post by spyinthesky on Mar 6, 2017 14:48:12 GMT 1
Crikey, too many excuses on here for a team that lost 3-1. Played some attractive football but errors cost goals against any team. They dealt with us. Referee/managers/more money than us doesn't matter. We've taken 3 out of 6 points off Newcastle. I would have taken that pre season, move on
|
|
|
|
Post by jonjo on Mar 6, 2017 14:48:41 GMT 1
Suppose the managers that have established themselves over decades sufficiently to get jobs at richer clubs should decline transfer funds so as to prove themselves against Wagner then huh? No, of course not but then there's spending a shed load and still being "disappointed and surprised" when you can't spunk more in the Jan transfer window: "Benitez did not add to his squad during the January window and, speaking after the game, indicated he was hoping to strengthen but was not given the backing to do so.
"My decision was very clear, [but] it was not my decision," the Spaniard, who had been keen to lure Andros Townsend back to Tyneside from Crystal Palace, told Sky Sports. "I said what I wanted and needed, and what the team needed, and that was it."
He later added in his press conference: "I can't change things now. We knew what we needed and we knew what we have.
"I'm disappointed (not to have signed anyone) but I have to concentrate on the players we have."
When asked if he was surprised at the club's lack of signings, he added: "Yes."
And when questioned if he could reveal what went wrong on deadline day, the former Real Madrid boss said: "No, because I don't know."[/i][/font][/quote] Managers always want to improve their squad. Mourinho would be livid if Man Utd don't strengthen in the summer. We lost more players than we brought in last summer. A player Rafa wanted was available and we have the resources to sign him. Are you suggesting he should just not want to strengthen in order to give the smaller clubs more of a chance against us? |
|
|
|
Post by mrg on Mar 6, 2017 14:51:24 GMT 1
£50m might buy them a diving twat, 11 more points, a weak ref and the ability to do that I reckon. Thanks for sharing, I'll mention it to Dean in the next supporters meeting For sure. Ritchie, a booking away from a two game ban, took a dive under the ref's nose. The replay of his heels being clipped was CGI because we paid Sky off too Mate I've watched it 3 times, he clips the back of his own heels. End of chat. Now please, do what I told you to do over an hour ago and Fuck off somewhere else so I can get on with my work. |
|
|
|
Post by jonjo on Mar 6, 2017 14:53:02 GMT 1
For sure. Ritchie, a booking away from a two game ban, took a dive under the ref's nose. The replay of his heels being clipped was CGI because we paid Sky off too Mate I've watched it 3 times, he clips the back of his own heels. End of chat. Now please, do what I told you to do over an hour ago and Fuck off somewhere else so I can get on with my work. All the pros on Sky must have missed it. Well done you |
|
|
|
Post by mrg on Mar 6, 2017 15:03:58 GMT 1
Mate I've watched it 3 times, he clips the back of his own heels. End of chat. Now please, do what I told you to do over an hour ago and Fuck off somewhere else so I can get on with my work. All the pros on Sky must have missed it. Well done you Is there some part of Fuck off you don't understand. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 6, 2017 15:06:10 GMT 1
I wonder if he's related to Julio Geordio?
|
|
|
|
Post by griffa on Mar 6, 2017 15:07:07 GMT 1
All the pros on Sky must have missed it. Well done you Is there some part of Fuck off you don't understand. Very perceptive of you they did miss it, as the video shows - UTT. |
|
|
|
Post by kennyk2 on Mar 6, 2017 15:07:20 GMT 1
For sure. Ritchie, a booking away from a two game ban, took a dive under the ref's nose. The replay of his heels being clipped was CGI because we paid Sky off too Mate I've watched it 3 times, he clips the back of his own heels. End of chat. Now please, do what I told you to do over an hour ago and Fuck off somewhere else so I can get on with my work. A bit of a Norman Wisdom moment. |
|
|
|
Post by jonjo on Mar 6, 2017 15:07:25 GMT 1
All the pros on Sky must have missed it. Well done you Is there some part of Fuck off you don't understand. Internet hard man |
|
|
|
Post by ACW on Mar 6, 2017 15:20:37 GMT 1
Can't really understand the reaction from some on here. You weren't controlling possession because you're a vastly superior footballing side. You were controlling it because Rafa set up to let you and the ability to control the game without the ball is something I'd never seen from a Newcastle side before we got him. It worked and you were restricted to long range efforts. The goals weren't lucky. The penalties were as contentious as each other. If we didn't have a lead we'd have been more adventurous but we did have it so didn't need go be gung ho. We don't play like that every week. It's horses for courses and we came with a game plan that we executed superbly. We're not naive enough to think we can go anywhere, play like Brazil and win. We've dominated some games this season in terms of possession but Saturday was one of our best showings in ages. The suggestion that we've had referees is laughable too. We've spent most games this season in the opposition half yet curiously conceded more penalties than we've been awarded. No team in the league will suffer a referee like we had to versus Forest away in December. Two rescinded red cards! Don't think Gayle was being particularly offensive either. I still expected more from Newcastle than 10 men behind the ball and long hoofs. I accept you defended well and kept us at arms length, but you played no football at all. I suspect Rafael set you up for a 0-0 (a point away from home is no bad thing when playing a promotion rival) and got lucky. Play that game again and it ends in a draw. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 6, 2017 15:25:29 GMT 1
It was Murphys initial poor ten yard first touch that enabled Ward to get there before him. I had no problem with Murphy going for that ball by the way, it was his right. However by the laws of the game the resulting foul should have ruled the goal out. Ward should have been braver IMO; if he'd have taken the ball and Murphy in the follow through then the goal wouldn't have happened. Unless the ref had given another penalty of course, which would have been unlikely. I put our defeat down to two goalkeeping errors. And like the much maligned Newcastle fans have pointed out on here we don't know how they would have approached the game had they not been ahead so early in the game. We might have won it, we might not but it doesn't help when we gift them 2 goals. That is WE gifted them, not the ref. Let's get one thing straight, at no time have i accused the officials of anything. My only response is to those that seem to think Murphy scored a legit goal. Bravery? I don't get that? Murphy came at it from behind Ward whose sole concentration was getting to that ball with both hands (initially) sweeping and bringing the ball into his chest with his right hand, so I don't get how he can take Murphy out in the follow through? The only criticism I could possibly aim at Ward would be he (in hindsight of course) may have wished he'd brought his left hand across sharpish. I don't get these accusations of cowardice, particularly where goalkeeping is concerned. |
|
|
|
Post by jonjo on Mar 6, 2017 15:29:00 GMT 1
Can't really understand the reaction from some on here. You weren't controlling possession because you're a vastly superior footballing side. You were controlling it because Rafa set up to let you and the ability to control the game without the ball is something I'd never seen from a Newcastle side before we got him. It worked and you were restricted to long range efforts. The goals weren't lucky. The penalties were as contentious as each other. If we didn't have a lead we'd have been more adventurous but we did have it so didn't need go be gung ho. We don't play like that every week. It's horses for courses and we came with a game plan that we executed superbly. We're not naive enough to think we can go anywhere, play like Brazil and win. We've dominated some games this season in terms of possession but Saturday was one of our best showings in ages. The suggestion that we've had referees is laughable too. We've spent most games this season in the opposition half yet curiously conceded more penalties than we've been awarded. No team in the league will suffer a referee like we had to versus Forest away in December. Two rescinded red cards! Don't think Gayle was being particularly offensive either. I still expected more from Newcastle than 10 men behind the ball and long hoofs. I accept you defended well and kept us at arms length, but you played no football at all. I suspect Rafael set you up for a 0-0 (a point away from home is no bad thing when playing a promotion rival) and got lucky. Play that game again and it ends in a draw. How so? We nullified your threat, with the attack we have at our disposal we were always likely to take chances at the other end. |
|
|
|
Post by Porrohman on Mar 6, 2017 15:42:41 GMT 1
£50m might buy them a diving twat, 11 more points, a weak ref and the ability to do that I reckon. Thanks for sharing, I'll mention it to Dean in the next supporters meeting For sure. Ritchie, a booking away from a two game ban, took a dive under the ref's nose. The replay of his heels being clipped was CGI because we paid Sky off too Ok we think he dived you don't, what about Voldemort taking the lace out of the ball with the ref having a clear view and not blowing up for it ? Sent from my SM-G900F using proboards |
|
|
|
Post by jonjo on Mar 6, 2017 15:45:15 GMT 1
Not intentional
|
|
|
|
Post by mrg on Mar 6, 2017 15:45:28 GMT 1
Is there some part of Fuck off you don't understand. Internet hard man I tell you what jonjo we'll do it your way. What's your number I'll give you a ring? |
|
|
|
Post by Porrohman on Mar 6, 2017 15:46:35 GMT 1
Mate I've watched it 3 times, he clips the back of his own heels. End of chat. Now please, do what I told you to do over an hour ago and Fuck off somewhere else so I can get on with my work. All the pros on Sky must have missed it. Well done you They did mention it while they were trying to blame it on a piece of fluff on Nakhis sock coming into contact with him causing him to go down like he'd been shot 3 strides later. Sent from my SM-G900F using proboards |
|
|
|
Post by jonjo on Mar 6, 2017 15:49:28 GMT 1
I tell you what jonjo we'll do it your way. What's your number I'll give you a ring? Hahaha hang about just changing my pants fella |
|
|
|
Post by galpharm2400 on Mar 6, 2017 15:49:48 GMT 1
Crikey, too many excuses on here for a team that lost 3-1. Played some attractive football but errors cost goals against any team. They dealt with us. Referee/managers/more money than us doesn't matter. We've taken 3 out of 6 points off Newcastle. I would have taken that pre season, move on errors do cost goals.. we made a serious one in the second minute of injury time.. the rest of the game was seriously 'affected' by poor decisions by the officials.. we didnt have enough close in good chances to win the game(honesty is the best policy) but I think we may have debunked the silly 'experts and one eyed managers' who continually and with a straight face, talk shit about a 'good result which clearly was not a good performance'.. 'we got away with it' is the only reply I truly want to hear from these clowns when its the actual truth of what millions of people with '2 eyes' have just witnessed in real time.. Its football, it happens quite often, its not great tactics or management, its mostly luck.. we have been thankful recipients of enough occasions but on here at least have been largely honest about it.. |
|
|
|
Post by mrg on Mar 6, 2017 15:52:33 GMT 1
I tell you what jonjo we'll do it your way. What's your number I'll give you a ring? Hahaha hang about just changing my pants fella Internet hard man. Now Jonjo, tell us all about your relationship with your mother? |
|
|
|
Post by jonjo on Mar 6, 2017 15:53:17 GMT 1
All the pros on Sky must have missed it. Well done you They did mention it while they were trying to blame it on a piece of fluff on Nakhis sock coming into contact with him causing him to go down like he'd been shot 3 strides later. Sent from my SM-G900F using proboards Or alternatively, without blinkers, the clip knocked him off balance and despite his best efforts he wasn't able to regain it within a couple of strides |
|
|
|
Post by jonjo on Mar 6, 2017 15:54:26 GMT 1
Hahaha hang about just changing my pants fella Internet hard man. Now Jonjo, tell us all about your relationship with your mother? Yawn. Zip it you boring little cocksnogger. |
|
