Macduff
Andy Booth Terrier
I've got a Gibson without a case but I cant get that even tanned look on my face.
Posts: 3,922
Member is Online
|
Post by Macduff on May 4, 2020 19:33:43 GMT 1
Interested in how this might be calculated. Otium got a one month ban on April 7th, when did the one month finish as I dont believe we have reached the 7th of May?
|
|
|
|
Post by Walton-on-the-Hill Terrier on May 4, 2020 19:48:39 GMT 1
Interested in how this might be calculated. Otium got a one month ban on April 7th, when did the one month finish as I dont believe we have reached the 7th of May? You misread grim’s post. Oti’s next yellow would result in a one month ban. He’s not had that yellow. |
|
|
|
Post by Chips Longhorn on May 4, 2020 20:00:36 GMT 1
Maybe Graham Poll is out new admin?
|
|
Macduff
Andy Booth Terrier
I've got a Gibson without a case but I cant get that even tanned look on my face.
Posts: 3,922
Member is Online
|
Post by Macduff on May 4, 2020 20:14:25 GMT 1
Ah ok must have misunderstood. Apologies all round, except what Poll did was pretty unforgivable.
|
|
ben1987
Mental Health Support Group
Posts: 7,240
|
Post by ben1987 on May 5, 2020 9:22:19 GMT 1
A poor decision to award chips a yellow card, very poor
|
|
|
|
Post by Chips Longhorn on May 5, 2020 10:29:05 GMT 1
A poor decision to award chips a yellow card, very poor Ben the script I sent you read "very very very poor". You're sacked from the clique |
|
ben1987
Mental Health Support Group
Posts: 7,240
|
Post by ben1987 on May 5, 2020 10:48:05 GMT 1
A poor decision to award chips a yellow card, very poor Ben the script I sent you read "very very very poor". You're sacked from the clique Fuck yourself mate, I hope you get a ban now. |
|
|
|
Post by Gag_N_Bone_Man (Destabiliser) on May 5, 2020 13:53:02 GMT 1
Not usually one for posting explanations of decisions in much detail, but Chips' card was akin to the issuing of a yellow to a player who has committed several low level fouls that, individually, are not severe enough for a card but cumulatively are.
|
|
|
|
Post by Chips Longhorn on May 5, 2020 14:24:01 GMT 1
Not usually one for posting explanations of decisions in much detail, but Chips' card was akin to the issuing of a yellow to a player who has committed several low level fouls that, individually, are not severe enough for a card but cumulatively are. So why are you posting explanations of decisions? If you have"low level fouls " you want to address with me surely the best way to do this would be to pm me? Maybe best not to continue this discussion in public |
|
ben1987
Mental Health Support Group
Posts: 7,240
|
Post by ben1987 on May 5, 2020 15:27:28 GMT 1
This forum has too many far left snowflakes
#banTed
|
|
|
|
Post by Chips Longhorn on May 5, 2020 15:36:53 GMT 1
This forum has too many far left snowflakes #banTed I agree Put me out my misery for the good of the board #banTed |
|
ben1987
Mental Health Support Group
Posts: 7,240
|
Post by ben1987 on May 5, 2020 15:41:43 GMT 1
This forum has too many far left snowflakes #banTed I agree Put me out my misery for the good of the board #banTed Pipe down fruit cake, this is my campaign. #banTed |
|
|
|
Post by Gag_N_Bone_Man (Destabiliser) on May 5, 2020 17:14:45 GMT 1
Not usually one for posting explanations of decisions in much detail, but Chips' card was akin to the issuing of a yellow to a player who has committed several low level fouls that, individually, are not severe enough for a card but cumulatively are. So why are you posting explanations of decisions? If you have"low level fouls " you want to address with me surely the best way to do this would be to pm me? Maybe best not to continue this discussion in public Apologies - had interpreted tours and Ben's back and forth about it as an objection and wanted to do you the courtesy of explaining - felt you deserved transparency. I'll not bother next time. |
|
Tinpot
Mental Health Support Group
I'm really tinpot
Posts: 24,085 
|
Post by Tinpot on May 6, 2020 12:17:19 GMT 1
If you do something worthy of a 1 month ban, at least have the sense to do it in February. Preferably when it's not a leap year.
|
|
|
|
Post by Mecha Corte on May 7, 2020 10:26:51 GMT 1
I've had a yellow card in the past for getting uppity on here but as far as I'm concerned the Admins deserve a pat on the back, spending their own time trying to keep things in check, for no reward, only grief, fair play to you. There's plenty of dicks on here but I'm sure the majority are on my way of thinking.
|
|
|
|
Post by Essex Terrier on May 7, 2020 10:32:03 GMT 1
A poor decision to award chips a yellow card, very poor Ben the script I sent you read "very very very poor". You're sacked from the clique That'll be the same clique responsible for banning Nick then?  |
|
|
|
Post by Gag_N_Bone_Man (Destabiliser) on May 7, 2020 14:57:43 GMT 1
Ben the script I sent you read "very very very poor". You're sacked from the clique That'll be the same clique responsible for banning Nick then? Nick is responsible for banning Nick |
|
|
|
Post by Porrohman on May 7, 2020 20:12:10 GMT 1
Ben the script I sent you read "very very very poor". You're sacked from the clique That'll be the same clique responsible for banning Nick then? Wasn't Ted the one that started the thread asking for your hero to be reinstated ? Edit : tried checking but it seems to have disappeared, presumably due to the KKK making an unwanted appearance 😉 |
|
|
|
Post by Chips Longhorn on May 7, 2020 20:20:20 GMT 1
That'll be the same clique responsible for banning Nick then? Wasn't Ted the one that started the thread asking for your hero to be reinstated ? Edit : tried checking but it seems to have disappeared, presumably due to the KKK making an unwanted appearance 😉 Correct.. I did do that and then deleted the OP due to my suggestion sparking ww3 |
|
|
|
Post by Essex Terrier on May 8, 2020 17:51:52 GMT 1
That'll be the same clique responsible for banning Nick then? Wasn't Ted the one that started the thread asking for your hero to be reinstated ? Edit : tried checking but it seems to have disappeared, presumably due to the KKK making an unwanted appearance 😉 Could be. |
|
|
|
Post by mids on May 13, 2020 7:06:12 GMT 1
Not usually one for posting explanations of decisions in much detail, but Chips' card was akin to the issuing of a yellow to a player who has committed several low level fouls that, individually, are not severe enough for a card but cumulatively are. I didn't realise that yellow cards could, and sadly would, be issued for committing several low level offences, and their accumulation. Is that in the DATM Forum Rules? I can't see it - but then it is early and my eyes are degrading |
|
|
|
Post by El Mel on May 13, 2020 8:05:11 GMT 1
Bring Back Nick.
|
|
|
|
Post by niggled on May 13, 2020 11:57:57 GMT 1
Lo Never , its bad on here with the political shite, but never bring that tedious fool back # fukin clown |
|
