Tinpot
Mental Health Support Group
I'm really tinpot
Posts: 24,105 
|
Post by Tinpot on Dec 7, 2023 8:00:45 GMT 1
|
|
|
|
Post by dezzly on Dec 7, 2023 9:11:17 GMT 1
Heard little rumours in summer we looked at onomah and Longstaff.No idea if anything in it then or now like.
|
|
|
|
Post by dezzly on Dec 7, 2023 9:15:05 GMT 1
Would probably take most of them.The two at 34 years old in Richie and Albrighton I’m not so sure on.But guess would be short term so maybe.
|
|
|
|
Post by terriersyndrome on Dec 7, 2023 9:49:24 GMT 1
Heard little rumours in summer we looked at onomah and Longstaff.No idea if anything in it then or now like. Josh Onomah has been a free agent for the last 6 months or so, I'd be surprised if we're waiting until January to sign him? |
|
incognito
Jimmy Nicholson Terrier
Posts: 1,511
|
Post by incognito on Dec 7, 2023 10:11:06 GMT 1
Looks like the Yorkshire Post is heading the same way as The Examiner...
|
|
|
|
Post by detox on Dec 7, 2023 12:04:58 GMT 1
Is short termism part of the 3 year plan ?
|
|
|
|
Post by benhomly on Dec 7, 2023 12:42:27 GMT 1
Is short termism part of the 3 year plan ? I would have thought short termism to get us away from our current predicament would be a perfectly acceptable part of the 3 year plan. |
|
|
|
Post by mosher on Dec 7, 2023 12:48:28 GMT 1
Is short termism part of the 3 year plan ? I would have thought short termism to get us away from our current predicament would be a perfectly acceptable part of the 3 year plan. Isn't demanding KN pays shitloads of money (risking FFP sanctions) also short termism so detox's post makes no sense anyway. |
|
|
|
Post by Gag_N_Bone_Man (Destabiliser) on Dec 7, 2023 12:49:13 GMT 1
Is short termism part of the 3 year plan ? I would have thought short termism to get us away from our current predicament would be a perfectly acceptable part of the 3 year plan. Josh Onomah is 26. Tariqe Fosu is 29. Anwar El-Ghazi is 28. Matty Longstaff is 23. None of these would be seen as a short termist approach. Whether they are realistic or not is a different thing. All of them would improve the squad. |
|
|
|
Post by detox on Dec 7, 2023 12:50:25 GMT 1
Is short termism part of the 3 year plan ? I would have thought short termism to get us away from our current predicament would be a perfectly acceptable part of the 3 year plan. but not applicable when it came to Warnock ? |
|
|
|
Post by detox on Dec 7, 2023 12:53:14 GMT 1
I would have thought short termism to get us away from our current predicament would be a perfectly acceptable part of the 3 year plan. Josh Onomah is 26. Tariqe Fosu is 29. Anwar El-Ghazi is 28. Matty Longstaff is 23. None of these would be seen as a short termist approach. Whether they are realistic or not is a different thing. All of them would improve the squad. I was just commenting on dezzly's post tbh.. |
|
|
|
Post by Gag_N_Bone_Man (Destabiliser) on Dec 7, 2023 13:00:43 GMT 1
Josh Onomah is 26. Tariqe Fosu is 29. Anwar El-Ghazi is 28. Matty Longstaff is 23. None of these would be seen as a short termist approach. Whether they are realistic or not is a different thing. All of them would improve the squad. I was just commenting on dezzly's post tbh.. yeah, I quoted the wrong post, sorry |
|
Tinpot
Mental Health Support Group
I'm really tinpot
Posts: 24,105
|
Post by Tinpot on Dec 7, 2023 14:08:20 GMT 1
Onomah is a weird one. Offered a contract at PNE & turned it down. Trial at Stoke, no offer of a contract.
I was hoping in the summer we'd chance our arm, but I do wonder why he's not got a contract anywhere. On paper, would be a great signing. But something seems not quite right.
|
|
|
|
Post by Ladaphosen on Dec 7, 2023 14:54:51 GMT 1
Onomah is a weird one. Offered a contract at PNE & turned it down. Trial at Stoke, no offer of a contract. I was hoping in the summer we'd chance our arm, but I do wonder why he's not got a contract anywhere. On paper, would be a great signing. But something seems not quite right. Sounds like a wage expectation issue to me |
|
Tiro
Jimmy Glazzard Terrier
Posts: 4,025
|
Post by Tiro on Dec 7, 2023 15:09:56 GMT 1
I would suggest the entire article is nothing but clickbait and is largely to be ignored.
I’m not saying we may not be interested in one or more of those suggestions, but there’s no evidence of this in the article whatsoever and it is based purely on the circumstance that they are available, hence the odds. There’s zero intel from agents or otherwise in the article; of all the platforms, Sports Lens would be close to the bottom of the pile for knowing who were interested In; they’re just a betting platform masquerading as a news channel.
|
|
|
|
Post by Gag_N_Bone_Man (Destabiliser) on Dec 7, 2023 15:18:14 GMT 1
I would suggest the entire article is nothing but clickbait and is largely to be ignored. I’m not saying we may not be interested in one or more of those suggestions, but there’s no evidence of this in the article whatsoever and it is based purely on the circumstance that they are available, hence the odds. There’s zero intel from agents or otherwise in the article; of all the platforms, Sports Lens would be close to the bottom of the pile for knowing who were interested In; they’re just a betting platform masquerading as a news channel. but it's something to talk about. |
|
Tinpot
Mental Health Support Group
I'm really tinpot
Posts: 24,105
|
Post by Tinpot on Dec 7, 2023 15:43:17 GMT 1
I would suggest the entire article is nothing but clickbait and is largely to be ignored. I’m not saying we may not be interested in one or more of those suggestions, but there’s no evidence of this in the article whatsoever and it is based purely on the circumstance that they are available, hence the odds. There’s zero intel from agents or otherwise in the article; of all the platforms, Sports Lens would be close to the bottom of the pile for knowing who were interested In; they’re just a betting platform masquerading as a news channel. Must admit, I thought the same as I posted it. But as Gag_N_Bone_Man (Destabiliser) says - it's something to talk about. Some players we could conceivably be interested in. Would we want them etc. Not the best source & probably says more about the decline in standard of "free at point of use" regional sports coverage than anything about our club. |
|
arry11
David Wagner Terrier
Posts: 2,774
|
Post by arry11 on Dec 11, 2023 18:20:54 GMT 1
If Onomah is a free agent why have we not brought him in sooner.
|
|
Wingman
Mental Health Support Group
Posts: 3,916
|
Post by Wingman on Dec 11, 2023 19:44:51 GMT 1
El-Ghazi likes a political tweet. Got binned off for it by his last club. Think maybe we swerve that one considering the pelters KN gets.
|
|
|
|
Post by Porrohman on Dec 16, 2023 8:15:57 GMT 1
El-Ghazi likes a political tweet. Got binned off for it by his last club. Think maybe we swerve that one considering the pelters KN gets. Perish the thought that someone could have an opinion. I bet if it'd been pro-Israeli he wouldn't have got sacked. |
|
Tinpot
Mental Health Support Group
I'm really tinpot
Posts: 24,105
|
Post by Tinpot on Dec 18, 2023 11:30:25 GMT 1
Might depend upon the nature of the post.
If he'd just left it at condemnation of the Israeli response it might (or might not) have led to a different outcome.
Certainly, if it hadn't included any antisemitism he'd have been easier to sympathise with.
|
|
|
|
Post by allan 1958 (OAF-WROY)(SSLFF) on Dec 31, 2023 11:59:45 GMT 1
I would have thought short termism to get us away from our current predicament would be a perfectly acceptable part of the 3 year plan. Josh Onomah is 26. Tariqe Fosu is 29. Anwar El-Ghazi is 28. Matty Longstaff is 23. None of these would be seen as a short termist approach. Whether they are realistic or not is a different thing. All of them would improve the squad. You're at it again! Using facts on a fan site is surely a yellow card. |
|
