|
Post by gledholt terrier on Aug 4, 2014 14:19:24 GMT 1
hammill has been very poor since stephens nobbled him no big loss imo move him out for a fee sign eagles on a free job done Sent from my GT-I9305 using proboards Hammill, who produced 10 assists last season, the most of any of our players? Good player on his day but hugely inconsistent. I'm actually quite shocked that his assists were only 10. If this leaves the door open for the more direct Lolley, think it will be a good move.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 4, 2014 14:23:40 GMT 1
It's always the same drama on here when a player is linked with leaving:
Roberts - "Oh we'll never replace his assists" Rhodes - "Oh we'll never replace his goals" Clayton - "He's our best player, we won't be able to replace him otherwise why would the buying club not buy said player instead" Hammill - "Oh we'll never replace his assists"
Yet we usually always do
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 4, 2014 14:28:54 GMT 1
hammill has been very poor since stephens nobbled him no big loss imo move him out for a fee sign eagles on a free job done Sent from my GT-I9305 using proboards Hammill, who produced 10 assists last season, the most of any of our players? before he got hacked after that his performance level went downhill fast Sent from my GT-I9305 using proboards
|
|
|
Post by Gag_N_Bone_Man on Aug 4, 2014 14:47:12 GMT 1
beg pardon?Sorry meant hammill left with his agent before training. CLAYTON TRAINED BUT I HAD LEFT BEFORE THE HAD FINISHED SO CANT COMMENT ON THE POST REGARDING SHAKING HANDS WITH EYRE AND LEAVING. Sorry' you'll have to speak up...i'm wearing a towel.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 4, 2014 15:05:00 GMT 1
Network sources suggest Clayton and Hammill deals are close, Brighton and Bolton. We are closing on deals for at least 3 players, mantom, GMS and it looks like robins has just pushed the button on the foreign fella as well. Could be a busy week, but I can also see us still been busy on transfer deadline day. By Network source s do you mean Sky and Twitter duh... no... The newsnetwork. Get with the program.
|
|
|
Post by galpharm2400 on Aug 4, 2014 15:19:20 GMT 1
hammill looked like he was in Bolton on Saturday..
I suspect the bright neon lights and the crazy nightlife/club scene and the tree lined, café society it offers has turned his head...
they do have more paramedics on duty than in Huddersfield so it might be a deal clincher for him..
|
|
Melc
Jimmy Glazzard Terrier
Posts: 4,829
|
Post by Melc on Aug 4, 2014 15:20:18 GMT 1
beg pardon?Sorry meant hammill left with his agent before training. CLAYTON TRAINED BUT I HAD LEFT BEFORE THE HAD FINISHED SO CANT COMMENT ON THE POST REGARDING SHAKING HANDS WITH EYRE AND LEAVING. How do you know Hammell was with his agent! Did he have a sign on his back?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 4, 2014 15:24:15 GMT 1
It's always the same drama on here when a player is linked with leaving: Roberts - "Oh we'll never replace his assists" Rhodes - "Oh we'll never replace his goals" Clayton - "He's our best player, we won't be able to replace him otherwise why would the buying club not buy said player instead" Hammill - "Oh we'll never replace his assists" Yet we usually always do I must have missed that 40 goal a season striker we replaced Rhodes with then, and the plethora of Good central midfielders we've had over recent years.
|
|
Melc
Jimmy Glazzard Terrier
Posts: 4,829
|
Post by Melc on Aug 4, 2014 15:24:23 GMT 1
Network sources suggest Clayton and Hammill deals are close, Brighton and Bolton. We are closing on deals for at least 3 players, mantom, GMS and it looks like robins has just pushed the button on the foreign fella as well. Could be a busy week, but I can also see us still been busy on transfer deadline day. Can you pass that on to the Unexaminer.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 4, 2014 15:27:20 GMT 1
Network sources suggest Clayton and Hammill deals are close, Brighton and Bolton. We are closing on deals for at least 3 players, mantom, GMS and it looks like robins has just pushed the button on the foreign fella as well. Could be a busy week, but I can also see us still been busy on transfer deadline day. Can you pass that on to the Unexaminer. They don't have a subscription.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 4, 2014 15:31:39 GMT 1
Read into it what you want but Clayton was talking to Steve Eyre outside canalside at lunch time today , they shook hands and clayts and drove off in his white jaguar , all the other players were inside having lunch , Think he's gone myself !! Clayton is gluten free so has to eat elsewhere.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 4, 2014 15:39:16 GMT 1
It's always the same drama on here when a player is linked with leaving: Roberts - "Oh we'll never replace his assists" Rhodes - "Oh we'll never replace his goals" Clayton - "He's our best player, we won't be able to replace him otherwise why would the buying club not buy said player instead" Hammill - "Oh we'll never replace his assists" Yet we usually always do I must have missed that 40 goal a season striker we replaced Rhodes with then, and the plethora of Good central midfielders we've had over recent years. When Vaughan has been properly fit, he's scored at a very similar rate as Rhodes has for Blackburn. He was banging them in early doors last season don't forget
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 4, 2014 15:43:16 GMT 1
Can you pass that on to the Unexaminer. They don't have a subscription. Hang on a sec, are you Calum?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 4, 2014 15:49:07 GMT 1
I must have missed that 40 goal a season striker we replaced Rhodes with then, and the plethora of Good central midfielders we've had over recent years. When Vaughan has been properly fit, he's scored at a very similar rate as Rhodes has for Blackburn. He was banging them in early doors last season don't forget True, but we all know that the chances of getting a near enough full season out of him are slim at best, and he is finishing is nowhere near the standard of Rhodes, so I would hardly call him a like-for-like replacement
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 4, 2014 16:05:44 GMT 1
Network sources suggest Clayton and Hammill deals are close, Brighton and Bolton. We are closing on deals for at least 3 players, mantom, GMS and it looks like robins has just pushed the button on the foreign fella as well. Could be a busy week, but I can also see us still been busy on transfer deadline day. Can you pass that on to the Unexaminer. They'll have seen it all on twitter months ago anyway.
|
|
|
Post by Gag_N_Bone_Man on Aug 4, 2014 16:10:41 GMT 1
Read into it what you want but Clayton was talking to Steve Eyre outside canalside at lunch time today , they shook hands and clayts and drove off in his white jaguar , all the other players were inside having lunch , Think he's gone myself !! Clayton is gluten free so has to eat elsewhere. tomorrow's unexamined headline: "Clayton not made from what shocker!"
|
|
|
Post by In sooth- - on Aug 4, 2014 16:21:45 GMT 1
I don`t understand that headline.
|
|
|
Post by Gag_N_Bone_Man on Aug 4, 2014 16:42:46 GMT 1
I don`t understand that headline. If Clayton is Gluten free he is not made from wheat. Oh, fuck it, nevermind.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 4, 2014 16:46:28 GMT 1
It's always the same drama on here when a player is linked with leaving: Roberts - "Oh we'll never replace his assists" Rhodes - "Oh we'll never replace his goals" Clayton - "He's our best player, we won't be able to replace him otherwise why would the buying club not buy said player instead" Hammill - "Oh we'll never replace his assists" Yet we usually always do Since he left weve had one player get more assists (by one) just once in the league than Roberts managed. And nobody has matched Rhodes goals tally (even I think if you start saying, "he was replaced with X AND Y). So...the history is that we tend to replace with lesser versions of those departing surely? Although I'd consider (hope anyway!) that the two signings we've made in Peltier and whatever the keeper is called ARE better than who theyve replaced. I'm not sure who if anyone Majewski replaces , so its difficult to say whether we've replaced someone with someone better. (Although youd hope hes better than Anton Robinson at least!).
|
|
|
Post by jasrick on Aug 4, 2014 17:01:38 GMT 1
It's always the same drama on here when a player is linked with leaving: Roberts - "Oh we'll never replace his assists" Rhodes - "Oh we'll never replace his goals" Clayton - "He's our best player, we won't be able to replace him otherwise why would the buying club not buy said player instead" Hammill - "Oh we'll never replace his assists" Yet we usually always do Since he left weve had one player get more assists (by one) just once in the league than Roberts managed. And nobody has matched Rhodes goals tally (even I think if you start saying, "he was replaced with X AND Y). So...the history is that we tend to replace with lesser versions of those departing surely? Although I'd consider (hope anyway!) that the two signings we've made in Peltier and whatever the keeper is called ARE better than who theyve replaced. I'm not sure who if anyone Majewski replaces , so its difficult to say whether we've replaced someone with someone better. (Although youd hope hes better than Anton Robinson at least!). Adam Clayton?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 4, 2014 17:13:54 GMT 1
It's always the same drama on here when a player is linked with leaving: Roberts - "Oh we'll never replace his assists" Rhodes - "Oh we'll never replace his goals" Clayton - "He's our best player, we won't be able to replace him otherwise why would the buying club not buy said player instead" Hammill - "Oh we'll never replace his assists" Yet we usually always do Since he left weve had one player get more assists (by one) just once in the league than Roberts managed. And nobody has matched Rhodes goals tally (even I think if you start saying, "he was replaced with X AND Y). So...the history is that we tend to replace with lesser versions of those departing surely? Although I'd consider (hope anyway!) that the two signings we've made in Peltier and whatever the keeper is called ARE better than who theyve replaced. I'm not sure who if anyone Majewski replaces , so its difficult to say whether we've replaced someone with someone better. (Although youd hope hes better than Anton Robinson at least!). Roberts assist stats were at an inferior level to the one we're now at, so you can't compare. I'm sure Hammill, Lolley, Scannell and Ward would rack up assists in a top league one side Of course we were going to end up with an inferior version of Rhodes. He went for £8 million and there aren't many players out there bagging 25+ goals every season. I think we did a pretty good job in getting Vaughan and Wells for 1/4 of what we sold Rhodes for, granted Vaughan has been injured a lot
|
|
|
Post by Nickhudds.UTT on Aug 4, 2014 17:17:58 GMT 1
I'd rather lose Hammil than Clayts, Hammil messes about too much and can't defend.
|
|
|
Post by shawsie on Aug 4, 2014 18:23:15 GMT 1
Hammill would be an even bigger loss than Clayton. The hammill who had a purple patch for 8/10 games around oct nov last season yes.......before and after that no way whatsoever. Clayts might not have the assists but thats probably down to him being so bloody deep most of the time. If theres 3m on the table for both then take it now imo - both can be replaced by a good manager. Whether robins can is more the question for me.
|
|
|
Post by goodshot (FGS) on Aug 4, 2014 18:43:54 GMT 1
Depending on formation - Hammill is going to struggle to hold down a place in front of Lolley this season.
|
|
|
Post by garyroberts'leftfoot on Aug 4, 2014 20:53:29 GMT 1
Depending on formation - Hammill is going to struggle to hold down a place in front of Lolley this season. We seem set to play 3-5-2 and only him or peltier can play right wing back. Peltier also seems to be playing centre back. Not much competition for places.
|
|
|
Post by Giggity on Aug 4, 2014 20:55:28 GMT 1
Depending on formation - Hammill is going to struggle to hold down a place in front of Lolley this season. We seem set to play 3-5-2 and only him or peltier can play right wing back. Peltier also seems to be playing centre back. Not much competition for places. Neither Peltier nor Hammill is a wing back. Square pegs!
|
|
|
Post by galpharm2400 on Aug 4, 2014 20:59:40 GMT 1
depending on how much ale hammill consumes, he might have trouble holding down his lunch, never mind his position..
|
|
|
Post by Beech's Nuts on Aug 4, 2014 21:04:09 GMT 1
I'd rather lose Hammil than Clayts, Hammil messes about too much and can't defend. Are you implying that Clayton can defend? If so it's a nooooooo from me.
|
|
|
Post by Up the Duff. on Aug 4, 2014 21:04:37 GMT 1
Why did we sign Lolley or Peltier if neither fit into the 352 formation ??!!
|
|
|
Post by aloadofdbullocks on Aug 4, 2014 21:13:31 GMT 1
beg pardon?Sorry meant hammill left with his agent before training. CLAYTON TRAINED BUT I HAD LEFT BEFORE THE HAD FINISHED SO CANT COMMENT ON THE POST REGARDING SHAKING HANDS WITH EYRE AND LEAVING. ha HA
|
|