Thwarting Dog
Steve Kindon Terrier
UP THE TERRIERS, PLAY LIKE TERRIERS, YOU WON'T GO FAR WRONG
Posts: 1,626
|
Post by Thwarting Dog on Oct 10, 2015 23:14:06 GMT 1
It's all a bit Kate Bush, its a mystery why he can't play 90 mins. I've said what do pros do in midweek beside s nowt No player can play 90 minutes if the manager decides to take him off. Hogg's often been subbed at Town yet is allegedly the fittest player at the club. Managers make changers for tactical reasons and taking a flair player like Lolley off for a more defensive minded player is something that both Robins & Mr Cautious are renowned for. I don't disagree, all I can do is think of when I picked a team;30 odd year ago in the District league and the day after in the Sunday league we played through shit. Shit being injury, we had a week to recover. Then just did it with no boot money involved
|
|
Thwarting Dog
Steve Kindon Terrier
UP THE TERRIERS, PLAY LIKE TERRIERS, YOU WON'T GO FAR WRONG
Posts: 1,626
|
Post by Thwarting Dog on Oct 10, 2015 23:19:48 GMT 1
Hey that's our Dennis we love it
|
|
|
Post by Boaty McBoatface on Oct 10, 2015 23:29:10 GMT 1
How can we expect him to last 90 minutes, when was the last time he had a regular run of games playing more than 10 minutes game by game let alone more than a half? He's only ever been allowed to start 4 games for us and ome of those was at Blackpool! He has played over 210 minutes of football in 2 weeks on loan.... Powell has given him less than 330 minutes of competitive football in the last 12 months.... How can we expect him to have played so much football Didn't he have the assist for the winner last week? I don't know how people aren't embarrassed coming out with such bullshit to back up their view. Where do you start with such nonsense. Your response is even more embarrassing!
|
|
|
Post by keithAM11532 on Oct 10, 2015 23:56:25 GMT 1
I don't know how people aren't embarrassed coming out with such bullshit to back up their view. Where do you start with such nonsense. Your response is even more embarrassing! Chumlee, never fails to entertain.
|
|
|
Post by doggusdave on Oct 11, 2015 0:21:29 GMT 1
Pray tell why he needs more than seven days to recover. It's not like he's played in the last seven days. Sent from my HTC One_M8 using proboards It's all a bit Kate Bush, its a mystery why he can't play 90 mins. I've said what do pros do in midweek beside s nowt It's all a bit Kate Bush ?? Do you mean Toyah Wilcox ? It's a Mithteree, it's a Mithteree !
|
|
|
Post by sapphireblue on Oct 11, 2015 0:40:11 GMT 1
The Scunthorpe manager got his team selection spot on today - fact.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 11, 2015 0:48:10 GMT 1
Pray tell why he needs more than seven days to recover. It's not like he's played in the last seven days. Sent from my HTC One_M8 using proboards Pray tell why must you have a signature pic that takes up half the screen? Because I couldn't find one that took up a full screen.
|
|
|
Post by 5kippy on Oct 11, 2015 0:58:39 GMT 1
We need him back to play up front. Now it's not often I would agree with one of your posts, but I think, this time, you are on to something. If Lolley's problem is giving the ball away, or poor defending, use him as a solution for our Striker situation. Play him alongside Nahki and give Miller a rest. He doesn't need to last the full 90. He could start or come off the bench, but his "trickery" and shooting (from outside the area) might be just what we need up front. Harry has been okay in the No. 10 role, but I think he sometimes lacks the finishing touch. Someone else, on here, suggested playing Lynch up front and I don't think that is as mad as it sounds either. It gives us something different to what we have and Joel certainly has the ability to do it. So rather than keep Hudson on the bench, chuck Joel up front with either Miller, Wells or Vaughan. Sometimes you just need to think outside of the box. TTID
|
|
Thwarting Dog
Steve Kindon Terrier
UP THE TERRIERS, PLAY LIKE TERRIERS, YOU WON'T GO FAR WRONG
Posts: 1,626
|
Post by Thwarting Dog on Oct 11, 2015 1:29:24 GMT 1
It's all a bit Kate Bush, its a mystery why he can't play 90 mins. I've said what do pros do in midweek beside s nowt It's all a bit Kate Bush ?? Do you mean Toyah Wilcox ? It's a Mithteree, it's a Mithteree ! Yeah, very true but..... It's all a bit Kate Bush, its a mystery why he can't play 90 mins. I've said what do pros do in midweek beside s nowt It's all a bit Kate Bush ?? Do you mean Toyah Wilcox ? It's a Mithteree, it's a Mithteree ! Yeah, same thing but wrong artist lol, well picked up on Heathcliff.
|
|
Thwarting Dog
Steve Kindon Terrier
UP THE TERRIERS, PLAY LIKE TERRIERS, YOU WON'T GO FAR WRONG
Posts: 1,626
|
Post by Thwarting Dog on Oct 11, 2015 2:09:13 GMT 1
|
|
|
Post by Nickhudds.UTT on Oct 11, 2015 8:43:22 GMT 1
We need him back to play up front. Now it's not often I would agree with one of your posts, but I think, this time, you are on to something. If Lolley's problem is giving the ball away, or poor defending, use him as a solution for our Striker situation. Play him alongside Nahki and give Miller a rest. He doesn't need to last the full 90. He could start or come off the bench, but his "trickery" and shooting (from outside the area) might be just what we need up front. Harry has been okay in the No. 10 role, but I think he sometimes lacks the finishing touch. Someone else, on here, suggested playing Lynch up front and I don't think that is as mad as it sounds either. It gives us something different to what we have and Joel certainly has the ability to do it. So rather than keep Hudson on the bench, chuck Joel up front with either Miller, Wells or Vaughan. Sometimes you just need to think outside of the box. TTID I always think outside the box mate.
|
|
|
Post by 3Pipe on Oct 11, 2015 9:02:32 GMT 1
I always think outside the box mate. You certainly do Nick. You certainly do.
|
|
|
Post by goodshot (FGS) on Oct 11, 2015 11:04:19 GMT 1
We need him back to play up front. Now it's not often I would agree with one of your posts, but I think, this time, you are on to something. If Lolley's problem is giving the ball away, or poor defending, use him as a solution for our Striker situation. Play him alongside Nahki and give Miller a rest. He doesn't need to last the full 90. He could start or come off the bench, but his "trickery" and shooting (from outside the area) might be just what we need up front. Harry has been okay in the No. 10 role, but I think he sometimes lacks the finishing touch. Someone else, on here, suggested playing Lynch up front and I don't think that is as mad as it sounds either. It gives us something different to what we have and Joel certainly has the ability to do it. So rather than keep Hudson on the bench, chuck Joel up front with either Miller, Wells or Vaughan. Sometimes you just need to think outside of the box. TTID I know which box Lynch is best in. Must be getting close to the Welsh squad (as a defender).
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 11, 2015 11:13:17 GMT 1
Just checked and in the three games he's started he's played just short of three and a half hours of football. At least Robins is giving him a relatively fair amount of game time. Worryingly he hasn't finished a game yet. Worringly we have loaned two of our players to a bloke who knows nowt about football. oh dear now you really are talking crap.Butyou are entitled to a view but like most of your posts they are covered in smog
|
|
|
Post by Headless Chicken on Oct 11, 2015 11:41:04 GMT 1
I don't know how people aren't embarrassed coming out with such bullshit to back up their view. Where do you start with such nonsense. Your response is even more embarrassing! I'd agree it was a bit pathetic on my behalf. Just can't be arsed 'debating' with some people on here; you may as well talk to a wall.
|
|
|
Post by Henry Mcgee on Oct 11, 2015 13:28:30 GMT 1
Pray tell why must you have a signature pic that takes up half the screen? Because I couldn't find one that took up a full screen. Must say it is pretty annoying. Please don't respond, for obvious reasons.
|
|
|
Post by Frankiesleftpeg on Oct 11, 2015 13:32:25 GMT 1
No player can play 90 minutes if the manager decides to take him off. Hogg's often been subbed at Town yet is allegedly the fittest player at the club. Managers make changers for tactical reasons and taking a flair player like Lolley off for a more defensive minded player is something that both Robins & Mr Cautious are renowned for. I don't disagree, all I can do is think of when I picked a team;30 odd year ago in the District league and the day after in the Sunday league we played through shit. Shit being injury, we had a week to recover. Then just did it with no boot money involved Sunday League football, I remember it well. I never played Saturdays as I preferred to watch Town. As I said though, its the manager that makes makes the decisions not the player.
|
|
|
Post by terriersyndrome on Oct 11, 2015 14:16:59 GMT 1
Now it's not often I would agree with one of your posts, but I think, this time, you are on to something. If Lolley's problem is giving the ball away, or poor defending, use him as a solution for our Striker situation. Play him alongside Nahki and give Miller a rest. He doesn't need to last the full 90. He could start or come off the bench, but his "trickery" and shooting (from outside the area) might be just what we need up front. Harry has been okay in the No. 10 role, but I think he sometimes lacks the finishing touch. Someone else, on here, suggested playing Lynch up front and I don't think that is as mad as it sounds either. It gives us something different to what we have and Joel certainly has the ability to do it. So rather than keep Hudson on the bench, chuck Joel up front with either Miller, Wells or Vaughan. Sometimes you just need to think outside of the box. TTID I know which box Lynch is best in. Must be getting close to the Welsh squad (as a defender). Speaking of which, I didn't see Huws' name on the Wales teamsheet yesterday, does anyone know if he's injured or just not selected?
|
|
|
Post by Essex Terrier on Oct 11, 2015 17:02:12 GMT 1
Given that Scunthorpe have been on a poor run of late, isn't it just possible that Robins for tactical reasons decided to leave Lolley on the bench today? Why do people assume that because he wasn't starting that he's somehow not good enough or fit enough? Alex Ferguson had a habit of leaving talented players out of the starting line up but folk didn't used to question his tactics. Now I know Robins isn't Ferguson and we're only talking about Scunthorpe but you bet your boots that Powell would have gone the cautious root had we been on the run Scunthorpe have. He only changed it to a more attacking formation at Charlton because of an injury to Hogg. You mean - the same reasons he's left on OUR bench, or doesn't even make that?!!
|
|
|
Post by Nickhudds.UTT on Oct 11, 2015 17:04:28 GMT 1
Was no point in him going really IMO.
|
|
|
Post by goodshot (FGS) on Oct 11, 2015 19:34:23 GMT 1
I know which box Lynch is best in. Must be getting close to the Welsh squad (as a defender). Speaking of which, I didn't see Huws' name on the Wales teamsheet yesterday, does anyone know if he's injured or just not selected? I assume he was just in the squad - but not the match day squad. Maybe he'll get in for their game v Andorra which is a dead game now.
|
|
|
Post by Headless Chicken on Oct 11, 2015 21:02:57 GMT 1
Was no point in him going really IMO. Why exactly; he's got considerably more minutes under his belt than he would at Town over the same period.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 12, 2015 17:48:46 GMT 1
I was at the Oldham Scunthorpe match.
First of all if people think we watch some crap defending, go watch L1 football!
Not sure how Lolley isn't getting in that team, I can only assume he had a knock as from what we've seen of him, despite the score line suggesting Scunthorpe played great (they really didn't Oldham are just that bad) he looks better than any of the 22 out there who played. Can't knock Robins as they won but can't fathom how he wasn't starting at all. They had Madden and McSheffery as wing forwards almost, but despite both scoring they looked rather ineffective and lacked any sort of flair, McSheffery's age was showing. Strange decision to leave him out but evidently one that paid off.
Wallace was decent, did his job quite well but almost looked like he's found his level unfortunately, missed an absolute sitter of a free header to make it 2-0 although I must give credit to the keeper with a great point blank save. Looked composed on the ball though and wasn't scared to move forward with it. His centre back partner, a certain David Mirfin, also put in a decent shift! He's done well to still be consistently playing at that level although I thought he was older than 30! Aggressive and gritty. Something I can't say for our other old boy Lee Croft...
On another note, the Oldham keeper looked very good despite conceding 4, some terrific saves, could be worth looking into, he doesn't look old.
|
|
|
Post by Boaty McBoatface on Oct 12, 2015 19:54:17 GMT 1
Chris Powell and Mark Robbins are the same type of manager: boring, tactically inept and out of their depth, which is why someone like Lolley will never get a chance with either of them.
|
|
|
Post by Nickhudds.UTT on Oct 12, 2015 20:03:50 GMT 1
Chris Powell and Mark Robbins are the same type of manager: boring, tactically inept and out of their depth, which is why someone like Lolley will never get a chance with either of them. Do you think Powell is better than Robins ?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 12, 2015 21:48:33 GMT 1
Chris Powell and Mark Robbins are the same type of manager: boring, tactically inept and out of their depth, which is why someone like Lolley will never get a chance with either of them. Joe Lolley has played in three of the last four teams put out by Robins. PS. Would apologise for the signature picture but I don't like you, so there!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 12, 2015 21:53:18 GMT 1
Chris Powell and Mark Robbins are the same type of manager: boring, tactically inept and out of their depth, which is why someone like Lolley will never get a chance with either of them. Maybe we should replace Powell with Andy Robbins?
|
|
|
Post by Boaty McBoatface on Oct 12, 2015 22:44:39 GMT 1
Chris Powell and Mark Robbins are the same type of manager: boring, tactically inept and out of their depth, which is why someone like Lolley will never get a chance with either of them. Joe Lolley has played in three of the last four teams put out by Robins. PS. Would apologise for the signature picture but I don't like you, so there! I'd love to continue the debate but I can't be bothered scrolling through all your Denis Law pictures.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 12, 2015 22:48:29 GMT 1
Joe Lolley has played in three of the last four teams put out by Robins. PS. Would apologise for the signature picture but I don't like you, so there! I'd love to continue the debate but I can't be bothered scrolling through all your Denis Law pictures. 1-0
|
|
|
Post by goodshot (FGS) on Oct 18, 2015 0:25:31 GMT 1
Lolley and Jordy both on the bench today.
|
|